[Jedidah]

I have no confidence that a physician with a short legislative career has the administrative experience to be President.

Ideology does not trump competence. Running your mouth, even if you’re right, is not enough qualification.

Haven’t we learned our lesson?

[Theodore R.]

11 percent for Jebbie = Victory! But do they know he appointed Judge Debra Nelson?

[TArcher]

NOT standing.

[ElkGroveDan]

The un-Obama, The un-Bush — Rand Paul for President

[little jeremiah]

If R. Paul doesn’t get serious about social conservative positions, no way. And that includes borders and amnesty.

[alstewartfan]

Rand is too soft on the immigration issue for my tastes. Plus, I dislike how he rants against the Amoeba’s nominees, then votes for them. Sometimes, I don’t get the man. He is smart and likeable, however. Bob

[Revel]

I would not vote for him if he was the last person on earth.

[AbolishCSEU]

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=pat+paulsen+for+president+1968&mid=8A93A5B6B67F039405DE8A93A5B6B67F039405DE&view=detail&FORM=VIRE1

[Lakeshark]

I'd vote for him if he won, but he's in the middle of the pack for me. He's not reliably conservative, and then there's that sticky problem of his genetics.......

I'd vote for Cruz, (Palin if she ran in lieu of Cruz), Walker, Perry, or even Jindal before him.

Our problem will be having too many conservatives in the race, plus a few wild cards like Paul bunching things up, splitting our votes while the "moderate" (Jeb or Christie this time) walks through with less than a third of the GOP vote.

We would be wise to solidify behind ONE conservative candidate, Cruz if he runs, then figure out how to convince Jeb, Christie, Ryan, and Paul to give serious runs at the same time.