Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Railway head says train in Canada tampered with
CNN ^ | 9 Jul 2013

Posted on 07/09/2013 7:43:28 AM PDT by mandaladon

CNN) -- The chairman of the company whose driverless train barreled into the small Quebec town of Lac-Megantic and unleashed a deadly inferno told a Montreal newspaper he believes it had been tampered with. "We have evidence of this," Ed Burkhardt said in an interview published by the Montreal Gazette. "But this is an item that needs further investigation. We need to talk to some people we believe to have knowledge of this." The company did not immediately return phone calls from CNN about the report. Burkhardt is the chief executive officer and president of Rail World, the parent company of the Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway, the operator of the derailed train. Seventy-two tanker cars carrying crude oil jumped the track early Saturday, setting off a huge fireball. At least 13 people are dead and 37 are missing. Officials in the town 130 miles east of Montreal say some were likely vaporized by the sheer intensity of the blaze, which burned for 36 hours.

(Excerpt) Read more at us.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Canada; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: canada; energy; lacmegantic; oil; quebec; train; trainwreck
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
The Montreal newspaper says Burkhardt doesn't "believe that the event was malicious or an act of terrorism." Burkhardt is quoted as saying that his company has begun an internal inquiry that has been "limited by rescue efforts and parallel investigations under way since Saturday."................Something strange happened here.
1 posted on 07/09/2013 7:43:28 AM PDT by mandaladon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

I’ve read that the firefighters turned OFF the lead engine, which was providing power to the air brakes.

Whether that’s the “tampering” he’s referring to , I don’t know.


2 posted on 07/09/2013 7:45:30 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
The brakes had been locked on all four locomotives.

All four wouldn't come unlocked by themselves.

3 posted on 07/09/2013 7:46:47 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (This is a sarcasm tag for the retards unable to recognize sarcasm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

It is clearly in the interest of the railroad to not bear responsibility for this event. So rather than it being a case of something simple - like the engineer neglecting to properly secure his train - they need to find some other outside factor.


4 posted on 07/09/2013 7:48:00 AM PDT by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

It’s already being reported that firemen responding to a fire in one of the locomotives earlier in the night shut down the engine on that locomotive. It was running to maintain brake pressure on the air brakes on the train and the pressure bled off over time. The train rolled into town after that. There’s another thread posted earlier with details.


5 posted on 07/09/2013 7:48:47 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stormer

Exactly. It may well be that the train was tampered with, but I’m sure as h*ll not going to believe it just because the chairman of the railroad says it is so.


6 posted on 07/09/2013 7:49:38 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
A few Years ago Brian Ross produced a segment of an ABC News show in which he demonstrated how easy it was to sabotage a Train carrying dangerous substances. He showed examples of how a simple and small explosive could be placed strategically so as to kill upwards of 100,000 people.

It would appear his intention was to inform the people and the government so that precautions could be taken to prevent such an incident from occurring.

What the BRAIN DEAD STUPID JACK@SS didn't realize is that it was IMPOSSIBLE to solve this problem, and all he accomplished was to notify terrorists of a ripe easy target.

I said at the time of the broadcast "That fool needs to be fired, because he doesn't understand that he has just handed terrorists an effective weapon."

Again, any countermeasures would be so costly or ineffective as to be impossible, so in effect all Brian Ross had done is to endanger the public by spreading knowledge of a security weakness.

7 posted on 07/09/2013 7:49:52 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Would not surprise me.

I remember right after the Boston Marathon bombings terror incident, they was I think a threat against an Amtrack train.


8 posted on 07/09/2013 7:55:02 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Opponents of building the Keystone XL Pipeline often cite safety and environmental hazards of pipelines, but I think hauling oil by rail or truck would seem to be far more hazardous.


9 posted on 07/09/2013 7:55:54 AM PDT by The Great RJ (construction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

Plus the pipeline systems around now are much better built for safety.


10 posted on 07/09/2013 7:59:31 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

I recall this ABC News story. I remember that the thing that concerned me was how easy it would be to access all the various chemical plants around the country. If this had been a train carrying tankers of chorine gas, it could have been a lot worse.


11 posted on 07/09/2013 7:59:58 AM PDT by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

Or by ship(Exxon Valdez).


12 posted on 07/09/2013 8:01:35 AM PDT by woodbutcher1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Please do look for the thread if you can. Thank-you.


13 posted on 07/09/2013 8:03:04 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
From another thread...

An extremist group called 350 Maine set up a blockade 2 weeks ago - Maine is next door to Quebec.

Hmmm...

14 posted on 07/09/2013 8:05:32 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3040657/posts


15 posted on 07/09/2013 8:06:23 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
Impossible,,, firefighters are Heroes and couldnt do such a stupid thing... /sarc
16 posted on 07/09/2013 8:09:45 AM PDT by ▀udda▀udd (>> F U B O << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
I’ve read that the firefighters turned OFF the lead engine, which was providing power to the air brakes.

This makes no sense to me.

As I understand it, the air brakes require air pressure TO DISENGAGE THE BRAKE PADS, so that any leak or loss of pressure would always lock up the brakes by design, for safety reasons.

So I think sabotage is very likely, eh ?

17 posted on 07/09/2013 8:23:48 AM PDT by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: saganite

Funny thing about air brakes is that without air pressure the brakes are fully applied.


18 posted on 07/09/2013 8:24:30 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: saganite
I thought that air was needed to release the brakes, without air pressure the brakes would go on. Sort of a fail safe in case an air line broke or if a rail car somehow became uncoupled.
19 posted on 07/09/2013 8:25:31 AM PDT by MRadtke (Light a candle or curse the darkness?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

that is not how it works. Air Brakes use air to open the brakes, without air they are closed. Standard design for a 150 years.


20 posted on 07/09/2013 8:34:54 AM PDT by ClayinVA ("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson