Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Governor Perry Vows Texas Will Pass Ban on Late-Term Abortions
life news ^ | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 07/07/2013 5:20:04 PM PDT by Morgana

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last
To: JCBreckenridge
Look, I get it that you hate the man with a passion.

Now you're starting to argue like a liberal. No, I don't hate the man. I simply disagree with his shallow, unprincipled public policies.

101 posted on 07/07/2013 9:37:29 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (America's Party - 'We're partisans only for principle.' www.SelfGovernment.US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

“I’m not trying to antagonize you. I’m simply telling you the truth about this legislation.”

And you are wrong about this. Very wrong.

I wish I could really change your mind. It makes me sad to know that there are so many on our side who will not come. :(

25 years of prolife service and it’s too much for you to even say, “Godspeed”.


102 posted on 07/07/2013 9:37:58 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
Anyways, I’ve worked with a lot of folks like you, and I’ll be blunt. When the crunch comes, you don’t show. There’s always an excuse.

That's funny. I've been in the trenches for two and half decades, and I've never seen nor heard from you before.

103 posted on 07/07/2013 9:38:59 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (America's Party - 'We're partisans only for principle.' www.SelfGovernment.US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

“Now you’re starting to argue like a liberal. No, I don’t hate the man. I simply disagree with his shallow, unprincipled public policies.”

No, sir. I made no mention of Perry. You did.You called it ‘political theatre’, which is exactly what liberals say about someone they don’t like. You attacked the man. You have a personal prejudice against Perry and that is coloring your opinion here.

Is the bill perfect? No. Is it good enough? Yes. Is it the endgame? Also no. There is still much work left to be done.


104 posted on 07/07/2013 9:41:01 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

later


105 posted on 07/07/2013 9:42:07 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

“That’s funny. I’ve been in the trenches for two and half decades, and I’ve never seen nor heard from you before.”

Come and you’ll find out. :)


106 posted on 07/07/2013 9:42:30 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
25 years of prolife service and it’s too much for you to even say, “Godspeed”.

Why would I say "Godspeed" to an effort that I fully believe is in violation of God's command to all mankind: "Thou shall not murder"?

Wouldn't that make me complicit?

The bill you support authorizes premeditated murder, under the color of law.

A fact you have not even challenged, much less refuted.

107 posted on 07/07/2013 9:42:43 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (America's Party - 'We're partisans only for principle.' www.SelfGovernment.US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

But it is political theater, done for the eyes of the recently visiting poohbahs of NRTL. It’s not hatred to say so, it’s simply obvious to folks who have been around awhile and observed how these people play games.


108 posted on 07/07/2013 9:44:55 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (America's Party - 'We're partisans only for principle.' www.SelfGovernment.US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

So, let me ask you, have you read the bill?


109 posted on 07/07/2013 9:46:33 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (America's Party - 'We're partisans only for principle.' www.SelfGovernment.US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

“Why would I say “Godspeed” to an effort”

Because it will save the lives of unborn children. Full stop.

“Wouldn’t that make me complicit?”

One, you’re in Iowa, so no, you’re not complicit in any fashion for what the state of Texas passes.

Two, you are complicit for what you say and tell people who are prolife. There’s a difference here. Principled opposition is one thing. Antagonizing prolifers another.

I believe we can make a real difference here in Texas, and the more people we get out here the better. You here is what we’d call ‘providing aid and comfort’ to the enemy. No different from Tokyo Rose in that respect.

So yes, you are complicit, sir.


110 posted on 07/07/2013 9:46:48 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Yes I have read the bill. Again, I agree with your criticisms that it’s not perfect.


111 posted on 07/07/2013 9:47:47 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

“But it is political theater, done for the eyes of the recently visiting poohbahs of NRTL. It’s not hatred to say so, it’s simply obvious to folks who have been around awhile and observed how these people play games.”

You are wrong, sir.

I was there. You were not.

My opinion on this > your second hand gossip.


112 posted on 07/07/2013 9:49:37 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Was this Perry’s “big” announcement that Drudge was teasing last week?


113 posted on 07/07/2013 9:50:10 PM PDT by stuck_in_new_orleans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
Because it will save the lives of unborn children. Full stop.

But it won't.

But even if it did, it would still be immoral and unconstitutional, because it creates a new class of sub-humans, which it authorizes the murder of, based solely on a specious, arbitrary, capricious, illogical, unreasonable criteria of pain.

114 posted on 07/07/2013 9:51:13 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (America's Party - 'We're partisans only for principle.' www.SelfGovernment.US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
My opinion on this > your second hand gossip.

I don't listen to gossip. Once again you're simply grabbing at straws and making stuff up.

115 posted on 07/07/2013 9:52:11 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (America's Party - 'We're partisans only for principle.' www.SelfGovernment.US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge
Yes I have read the bill. Again, I agree with your criticisms that it’s not perfect.

I've never said "it's not perfect." I've said it is bad from end to end. It's morally, constitutionally rotten to the core.

116 posted on 07/07/2013 9:53:17 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (America's Party - 'We're partisans only for principle.' www.SelfGovernment.US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

It will save the lives of unborn abortions as it shuts down clinics across Texas. Fact.

“because it creates a new class of sub-humans”

False. If the bill fails, Abortion will still be legal in Texas.


117 posted on 07/07/2013 9:54:35 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

We’ll have to disagree on that. I see significant progress towards our common end. Today. Not tomorrow.


118 posted on 07/07/2013 9:55:42 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Gah,

“it will save the lives of unborn children all across Texas as it shuts down clinics.”


119 posted on 07/07/2013 9:56:29 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

As it is, your opinion of the folks going is based on second hand hearsay, and gossip.

It’s frankly, based on prejudice. “prolife poobahs”.

Who was the primary organizer of day 1, sir?


120 posted on 07/07/2013 9:59:18 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson