Posted on 07/05/2013 3:38:50 PM PDT by blueyon
NEW YORK, July 5, 2013 (C-FAM.org) - UNICEF says that nations are bound by international law to recognize the right of children to sexually related information and services without parental knowledge.
UNICEF's latest annual report revealed that it interprets two UN human rights treaties -- on disabilities and children's rights -- to include a child's right "to confidential sexual and reproductive health information and services during adolescence and into early adulthood."
UNICEF defines adolescents as minors between 10 to 19 years of age.
Neither treaty mentions such a right, but in 2009 the committee that monitors the children's treaty began interpreting it such that children must have access “without parental consent” to “reproductive health education or services,” a term often used by UN staff to include abortion.
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
No, in Muslim countries 9 and 10 year old girls are wife material, so naturally, the UN would give its approval to that. Our tax dollars at work, keeping these pagans in the chips.
Yep, they are as grossly inept and useless as the rest of the UN.
Not if you're a muslim.
That most perfect of all men boinked Aisha when she was 9.
They will do anything to destroy parents rights and obligation to give their kids a set of values.
They will then replace them with the government’s set of ‘values.’
Yet if I purchase raw milk for my children to consume CPS will take them away and put me in jail.
“isn’t having sex with a 10 year old a CRIME!”
Not according to international law, it seems. The first sentence of the article recognizes the right of a 10 year old to sexually related services without parental consent.
I vaguely remember remember a scandal in Africa about 10 years ago involving sexual molestation of children by Do-Gooders of some kind.
Deviant organizations
Maybe they are in $$$ on a child prostitution racket in those third world nations. Don’t want that evidence lying around.
They need to clearly define the age-ranges of some of the “rights” they claim. It seems that pre-birth babies have no rights unless someone kills them outside an abortion clinic and that parental adults have very limited rights for much of anything. The toddlers through the adolescents seem to have the most rights unless you bring in Latinos and Blacks, then the whole thing skews again. It’s....so....damn...confusing.
I wish FR had a "like" button...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.