To: SeekAndFind
2 posted on
07/03/2013 7:58:09 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Who could have known that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional news?)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Innocent people do not need immunity. Guilty people do not deserve it,
18 posted on
07/03/2013 8:03:16 AM PDT by
inpajamas
(http://outskirtspress.com/ONE)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Jail her for contempt. She ALREADY waived her rights, so calling for immunity now is just a bit too late. . .
31 posted on
07/03/2013 8:08:35 AM PDT by
Salgak
(http://catalogoftehburningstoopid.blogspot.com 100% all-natural snark !)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
If she is willing to tell everything, and leave nothing unsaid, then yes.
She’s small fish compared to whom we could get.
It’s either that or she’s about as high as we could get.
72 posted on
07/03/2013 9:24:40 AM PDT by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
This is what it will take to bring down the Obama regime. We are going to have to accept the fact that some criminals will walk if we are to bring down the head of this governmental beast. I would give her a immunity if she can connect this to the president.
73 posted on
07/03/2013 9:25:06 AM PDT by
JerseyDvl
(Cogito Ergo Doleo Soetoro, ABO and of course FUBO!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Congress should simply tell her no immunity, jail her for contempt, and cease any communication with her, say for about a decade or two.
86 posted on
07/03/2013 9:54:53 AM PDT by
SCHROLL
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson