Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutors in Zimmerman Trial Ask Jury to Disregard Comments (Too favorable towards Zimmerman)
The New York Times ^ | July 2, 2013 | Cara Buckley

Posted on 07/02/2013 3:53:36 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

SANFORD, Fla. — Prosecutors in the second-degree murder trial of George Zimmerman scrambled Tuesday to undo damage to their case by one of their leading witnesses, a Sanford police officer who interviewed the defendant hours after he fatally shot Trayvon Martin.

The witness, Officer Chris Serino, testified under cross-examination on late Monday afternoon that Mr. Zimmerman seemed to be telling the truth when he said he had fired his gun in self-defense. The officer’s admission made for a dramatic moment in the trial — and was a clear boon for the defense — but drew no immediate objection from the state. The court recessed for the day afterward.

But early on Tuesday, citing case law, the state successfully argued that Officer Serino’s comments about Mr. Zimmerman’s veracity ought to be disregarded by the jury. The judge then instructed the jurors, who are being sequestered during the trial, to ignore the officer’s statement, nearly 17 hours after it had been made.

Officer Serino’s testimony, in the second week of the trial in Seminole County Court, was the latest setback for prosecutors......

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: chrisserino; florida; railroaded; trayvon; zimmerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last
Hard to un-ring a bell.
1 posted on 07/02/2013 3:53:36 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yep, it is also really hard to prosecute someone when there is no evidence to support your claims.


2 posted on 07/02/2013 3:55:33 PM PDT by svcw (Stand or die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The judge asked the state what remedy it wanted. It had grounds for a mistrial, and could have asked for that. That’s how to unring a bell.


3 posted on 07/02/2013 3:56:45 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

retroactive objection?

Never saw that on Perry Mason...


4 posted on 07/02/2013 3:58:00 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

On what basis?

A witness is not allowed to give an opinion on another witness, but Zimmerman is not a witness, he’s the defendant.


5 posted on 07/02/2013 3:58:03 PM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

True, and often the attempt to do so causes more reverberations than one would intend. This even smells of desperation.


6 posted on 07/02/2013 3:58:03 PM PDT by RobertClark (My shrink just killed himself - he blamed me in his note!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That move hurt them more than the actual statement.


7 posted on 07/02/2013 3:58:06 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Wouldn’t that be rewarding the prosecution for their own ineptitude?


8 posted on 07/02/2013 3:58:35 PM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I hope that holds true. How in the world can the prosecution discount testimony merely because it’s favorable to Zimmerman, and came from an official? If he’d said something they like, they wouldn’t have discounted it. So, it’s not the official they have the problem with (or they could have objected to him before trial), it’s that what he said is favorable to the defense. Zimmerman doesn’t have a right to fair testimony, even if it turns out to be favorable to him? I thought the truth mattered (not really, but you know what I mean), search for the truth and all that. It’s only true if it discredits Zimmerman?


9 posted on 07/02/2013 3:58:35 PM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The whole trial is a mockery. If the DA’s office had any integrity they’d nolle prosse and stop wasting tax dollars to placate the media lynch mob.


10 posted on 07/02/2013 3:58:44 PM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They’re going to have to offer Mr. Zimmerman a spot in the witness protection program.

That’ll be part of the deal he’ll demand.


11 posted on 07/02/2013 3:59:06 PM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The prosecution FAKED a cursive letter, and
FAKED the existence of REAL bruises on Mr. Zimmerman,
and has used the MSM to FAKE even the appearances
of the Obama-chosen “victim”.

Neither the facts nor the Law is on the side
of the cruel prosecution which has made this a
racist kangaroo court.


12 posted on 07/02/2013 3:59:35 PM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Any Freeper Lawyers?

QUESTION - Will the Defense move to dismiss charges after the Prosecution rests.

It seems Judge would have to dismiss at least the 2nd degree murder charge? Correct

13 posted on 07/02/2013 4:00:15 PM PDT by 11th Commandment (http://www.thirty-thousand.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

” The state also aired a televised interview from 2012 with Mr. Zimmerman by Sean Hannity, the Fox News host, in which Mr. Zimmerman recounted his version of events before adding, “I feel that it was all God’s plan,” as Mr. O’Mara squirmed by his side. “

I don’t think MOM really squirmed about anything. I’m sure he knew it was coming.


14 posted on 07/02/2013 4:00:47 PM PDT by MNDude (Sorry for typos. Probably written on a smartphone, and I have big clumsy fingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That opinion statement by the officer hurt them. The prosecutor waited too long. Even the instruction to the jury reemphasized the opinion by the policeman. The prosecution in this case seems inept.


15 posted on 07/02/2013 4:01:17 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Yeah, really.

If they didn’t really pay attention to it yesterday, they were reminded to, today.


16 posted on 07/02/2013 4:03:08 PM PDT by Salamander (.......Uber Alice!.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
He can obtain Peruvian citizenship as his mother comes from there. He might want to pursue that.
17 posted on 07/02/2013 4:04:16 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's next run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

A fair and impartial trial was never in the State’s plans. Why they did not sweat a “signed confreesion” a/l/a the Stalin era Show trials remains a mystery. The goal of tthe “trial” is to “legally” convict Zimmerman to go along with the media conviction.


18 posted on 07/02/2013 4:04:25 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
That move hurt them more than the actual statement.

Yeah, and it looks pretty weird if you're jumping up in court to object to a statement by your own witness.

I'm guessing that's why the wait.

Either that or else they were so gob-smacked they didn't know whether to **** or go blind.

19 posted on 07/02/2013 4:05:54 PM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

There is no way every jurist there didn’t go “HUH?”

Even TV law isn’t that stupid. 17 hours of consideration does not evaporate because the judge wants it to.


20 posted on 07/02/2013 4:06:23 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson