Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/01/2013 1:43:07 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

Cuomo doubling down on his unconstitutional and treasonous legislation.


2 posted on 07/01/2013 1:50:36 PM PDT by ObozoMustGo2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

In 1792 the most effective military weapons were absolutely in the lawful hands of private citizens. The Brown Bess, the Pennsylvania rifle, and others, including some land and naval ordnance were in private hands. In the period after the Civil War, and even before, weapons superior to those used by the military were widely owned. Think Winchester rifles. Anyone who has ever watched a western and knows a bit about history can make this part of Cuomo’s argument, that the 2nd amendment was not meant for military style rifles,disappear.


3 posted on 07/01/2013 2:24:48 PM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The Progressives are so afraid that the “commoners” will finally realize their place and plight and will rise up like the Egyptians .... but the Egyptians have no guns, which is exactly they way the Progressives want to keep it. The Progressives always cite that the “rule of law” should prevail regardless how badly they rig it and bastardize it.


4 posted on 07/01/2013 2:27:10 PM PDT by RetiredTexasVet (Drug abuse is not a victimless crime ... look at what Obama is doing to the country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
The state’s motion says that assault weapons are unusually dangerous military-style firearms and are not in common use.(Patent Bullshit)It also alleges that New York’s bans on assault weapons do not even implicate plaintiffs’ Second Amendment rights,(More obvious Bullshit) because such weapons are not within the scope of the Second Amendment.Absolute unmitigated Bullshit.
5 posted on 07/01/2013 2:41:25 PM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

so he gets to ram through an UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW, then he gets to demand that noone challenge him legally? Did NY elect a freaking king or soemthing?


6 posted on 07/01/2013 2:42:40 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The state of New York sounds awfull desperate to me.


8 posted on 07/01/2013 3:28:09 PM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I am no longer under the juris-my-dick-ion of Prince Andrew and his NYC cabal of communists.

I am now and have been ofr some time been soverign individual and and will not follow the laws that they think they make. Nor will will I accept the rulings of any judge who has been appointed by a democRAT


11 posted on 07/06/2013 1:31:54 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson