Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hobby Lobby wins partial victory from appeals court in health care challenge
The Oklahoman ^ | June 27, 2013 | Brianna Bailey

Posted on 06/27/2013 11:15:01 AM PDT by gwjack

A federal appeals court in Denver has reversed a lower court's decision to deny Hobby Lobby Stores Inc.'s quest for an injunction against part of the Affordable Care Act that requires it to cover the cost of emergency contraceptives for some of its employees.

In a 168-page ruling issued Thursday, the appellate court sent Hobby Lobby case back to a lower court for further review.

The panel of nine appellate court judges who heard arguments in the case in May ruled unanimously that Hobby Lobby and its affiliated Christian bookstore chain Mardel have the right to sue over the Affordable Care Act.

The ruling is a blow to the federal government's argument that as for-profit corporations, the companies cannot claim that the health care law is a violation of constitutionally protected religious freedoms.

Five of the nine judges found that Hobby Lobby meets at least part of the legal standard to receive a temporary injunction against the health care law while its lawsuit is ongoing.

The other four judges said the company fully meets the legal standard and that the appellate court should order the lower court to grant the company an injunction.

Hobby Lobby's lawsuit will now head back to U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, which earlier ruled against Hobby Lobby's quest for relief from the health care law.

Beginning in July, the company faces fines of as much as $1.3 million a day for failing to comply with the health care law.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: contraceptives; hobbylobby; mardel; obamacare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Well, well, well. Our imperial potentate leaves the country and look what happens.

I know this is an answer to prayer.

1 posted on 06/27/2013 11:15:01 AM PDT by gwjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gwjack

yesssssss!!!!!


2 posted on 06/27/2013 11:20:51 AM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

” Beginning in July, the company faces fines of as much as $1.3 million a day for failing to comply with the health care law.”

INSANE fine.....all calculated to destroy a Christian- owned business.


3 posted on 06/27/2013 11:21:54 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (The RINO/amnesty argument goes like this: 1) If we pander to Hispanics, we will save the GOP, at le)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwjack
Beginning in July, the company faces fines of as much as $1.3 million a day for failing to comply with the health care law.

good grief...

4 posted on 06/27/2013 11:22:20 AM PDT by BookmanTheJanitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

I predict they will lose when SCOTUS tells them “it’s a tax and you’re all bigots”.


5 posted on 06/27/2013 11:31:10 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Freedom!


6 posted on 06/27/2013 11:36:29 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Beat me to it.


7 posted on 06/27/2013 11:37:39 AM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
"Beginning in July, the company faces fines of as much as $1.3 million a day for failing to comply with the health care law." INSANE fine.....all calculated to destroy a Christian- owned business.

It is an excessive fine, and it is calculated to destroy a Christian business. It is also a shocking violation of the Bill of Rights:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . . Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

The thugs on the far left managed to grossly and intentionally violate the First and Eighth amendments. The current thugocracy cannot be considered legitimate.

8 posted on 06/27/2013 11:40:59 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

BUMP


9 posted on 06/27/2013 11:42:31 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (The RINO/amnesty argument goes like this: 1) If we pander to Hispanics, we will save the GOP, at le)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

Such draconian measures beg for civil disobedience.


10 posted on 06/27/2013 12:20:27 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

Tyndale House Publishers got a stay in its case as well this past fall. They are far from out of the woods but at least aren’t being fined yet either.


11 posted on 06/27/2013 12:34:18 PM PDT by cdga5for4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Let’s hope it will ultimately destroy CommieCare.

(yeah, right)


12 posted on 06/27/2013 12:34:20 PM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gwjack

BTTT
Keep praying.


13 posted on 06/27/2013 12:53:17 PM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

They threw them a bone yet the country is still burning to the ground.


14 posted on 06/27/2013 3:45:58 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gwjack
"168 page ruling"

I guess it's encouraging, but should it take 168 pages to affirm that businesses have a right to offer no medical coverage, or limited medical coverage, and to determine for themselves what coverage to offer, and not be subject to arbitrary federal mandates and penalties?
15 posted on 06/27/2013 6:57:27 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwjack
Been spending a bit of money at Hobby Lobby lately. Never had heard of the store before this year. But I wanted to support them because of their stand for Christ and against Obamacare. Walked into the store and have since bought pictures, garden accessories, a cute bistro set... Glad to see my investment's paying off.;)

Seriously, prayers up and stand strong HL!

16 posted on 06/28/2013 6:24:33 AM PDT by 444Flyer (How long O LORD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer

This is wonderful news. We have had a hard week in this country but here is a bright spot.


17 posted on 06/28/2013 8:24:24 AM PDT by SADMILLIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gwjack
what kind of victory is that?
18 posted on 06/28/2013 9:30:16 AM PDT by Drawn7979
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwjack
Five of the nine judges found that Hobby Lobby meets at least part of the legal standard to receive a temporary injunction against the health care law while its lawsuit is ongoing. The other four judges said the company fully meets the legal standard and that the appellate court should order the lower court to grant the company an injunction.

That's a major smack-down back to the lower court. The fight continues, and that's good news!

19 posted on 06/28/2013 10:00:31 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SADMILLIE

It really is a bright spot. We need it! And welcome to FR.:) A lot of good folks on here.


20 posted on 06/28/2013 2:49:03 PM PDT by 444Flyer (How long O LORD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson