Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
Many social conservatives won’t be happy to hear him talking about leaving things to the states

BS.

I'm thrilled. A lot more should have been left to the States, and the Federal Government kept small.

If the homos want to dominate a state, people will at least be able to vote with their feet.

When it's national the last line of defense is the Church and it is under attack, too.

Personally, I will refuse to recognize any homosexual union as "marriage".

29 posted on 06/26/2013 6:37:20 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

What Joe said.

Reflects my views precisely. IF they leave this pretty much to the states I have no problem. Let the dykes and faggots gravitate to California and Massachussetts and other such locales and leave the other states less infected. Win. Win.

If California wants to let people marry their cocker spaniels, more power to them. Maybe when enough homosexuals and animal lovers have migrated there, it will fall into the ocean from the weight of them.

We can always hope, anyway.

Hank


43 posted on 06/26/2013 7:37:00 PM PDT by County Agent Hank Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Smokin' Joe

America is not going to have a situation where some families are ghettoized into half the states, and their marriage and family not recognized in others, or when they enlist, or work for the federal government.


44 posted on 06/26/2013 7:44:46 PM PDT by ansel12 (Libertarians, Gays = in all marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson