Skip to comments.Charge: UW biology student raped 12-year-old runaway (member of CAIR)
Posted on 06/23/2013 1:50:47 PM PDT by lowbridge
According to the girls account, Abdelbadie approached and struck up a conversation with her, and then asked her to smoke marijuana with him. The girl said she told him her age several times before he brought her back to his apartment, where he had sex with her after claiming she had seduced him.
The girl left Abdelbadies home the following day. Abdelbadie and a friend are alleged to have walked her home, and watched hiding behind a fence as she walked up to the house.
Abdelbadies friend who met Abdelbadie when signing him up for a childrens charity -- then called 911 after arguing with Abdelbadie about his conduct with a young girl. Officers responded to the area and arrested Abdelbadie.
According to charging papers, Abdelbadie told police he met the girl walking near University Avenue and claimed she was dressed provocatively. He is alleged to have admitted he hooked up with the girl, but would not say whether he knew her true age.
(Excerpt) Read more at seattlepi.com ...
Surprised? the question is will all the sickos in congress go along with the calling for her to be stoned to death for seducing him according to sharia law. YOU LAUGH!
But we should not judge him by our cultural standards for what is perfectly acceptable in islam. That would be WRONG!
MadMo is not amused!
That 12 year old did seduce that nice Muslim away from boys and goats.
Do you Infidels now understand why we Muslims wisely subject our females to “female excision”?
Excised females are obedient and do not wander off into places full of ‘creepy’ people.
What are you waiting for, the 12th Imam? Excise, Excise, EXCISE!
Ahh...does this 12 year old infidel child have 4 witnesses to the rape as required by Sharia law?
Whoopi says it’s not rape rape.
Having sex with a fourteen year old girl?
He was just channelling Muhammad.
He only raped the fourteen year old because there wasn’t a nine year old handy.
Guess she’ll now have to be honor killed.
Sharia requires 4 male witnesses to the act of adultery to convict a woman. The requirement was intended specifically as a protection to women against false accusations of adultery.
I am not a fan of sharia, by any means. But there are plenty of perfectly good criticisms that don't require saying things that just aren't true.
Only that it was a girl.
Just another Muslim re-enacting his hero-founder’s pedophilia.
Under moslem "law" a woman who's been raped is charged with adultery and hanged.Check it out.
So, under Sharia, what would it take to convict this monster and what would his punishment be?
And, under Sharia, what would be the proper disposition of the 12 year old girl?
I am not a Muslim lawyer.
However, my understanding is that there is no punishment under sharia for a victim of rape. I assume she must prove, somehow, that it was rape-rape, and that she is not claiming rape to get out of an adultery charge.
In the time of Mohammed, as described in the link I mentioned, the rape victim picked the rapist out of a crowd and he was stoned to death at Mohammed’s command. No other witnesses.
My understanding that DNA and other physical evidence also can be construed as “a witness.”
This is not to say that ignorant Muslims, especially in tribal and primitive areas, don’t misapply sharia. I think these are the primary ones who stone girls to death for being raped, which does indeed happen. There are even places where a girl is sentenced to be raped by a number of men as punishment for an offense committed by a member of her family. Then the girl is stoned to death for immorality. Everybody goes home happy. (Except the girl, of course.)
Such things do happen in (primitive, backward) Muslim areas. I just think it is a mistake to call what they do sharia. (Even if that is what they call it.)
I just think it is a mistake to call what they do sharia. (Even if that is what they call it.)...Is that kind of like I murdered my neighbor, but I didn’t, even if the cops say that is what they call it?
How do you tell the difference?
Sharia requires 4 male witnesses to the act of adultery to convict a woman....Sounds like the barbarians only want a gang bang.
A remote valley in Afghanistan or Kurdistan is quite different from Kabul or Baghdad. In these ways, anyhow.
It’s just silly to lump 1.2B or so people together and say, “They’re all the same.”
All Muslims share, IMO, a religion peculiarly susceptible to encouraging evil behavior. But not all Muslims are evil, anymore than all Christians are good.
Right. But under Sharia the male adulterer is also executed. Or is supposed to be.
Of course, for a male adultery is defined only as sex with a married women, as it was under the Law of Moses. A married man having sex with an unmarried woman is not committing adultery.
“...My understanding that DNA and other physical evidence also can be construed as a witness....”
Going closer to “source material” (see linked article) I guess that DNA could be considered as supporting SECONDARY evidence IF the woman could find 4 MALE witnesses, as the PRIMARY evidence, to the act of rape. Other than than, she’s SOL.