Romney’s Revenge

National Review ^ | June 18, 2013 | National Review

[roamer_1]

Mere Republicanism. Your words belie your moniker. There is *nothing* ‘principled’ in that view.

[FutureRocketMan]

the republican party is supposed to be the conservative party. without republicans being conservative, the tea party would have little voice, because their candidates would win if they were a third party candidate (hence we have no “Libertarian Party USA” pols in federal office). To preserve that, Republicans have to preserve their conservative voice, meaning cut out, however painful, those “moderates” or liberals who call themselves Republicans, but are truly not.

[Mogger]

he could have and should have won. But conservatives stayed home, and Obama’s minions committed massive fraud that cost Romney tens of thousands of votes in several battleground states.

I held my nose and voted for him.

Don't know if I can even do that again for another liberal anti second amendment "republican".

I guess this country has to just go down the tubes to rock bottom.

The "republican" establishment has to realize we need to have conservative / libertarian candidates who will go strictly by the CONSTITUTION.

[DManA]

A liberal republican can do as much damage as a liberal democrate, plus they stink up the brand name. So a liberal republican is marginally worse.

[FutureRocketMan]

agreed

[Tennessee Nana]

Republicans have to preserve their conservative voice, meaning cut out, however painful, those “moderates” or liberals who call themselves Republicans, but are truly not.
___________________________________________

It did not “pain” me at all to cut out the liberal baby killer father of gay marriage Willard, who was once a Democrat and now calls himself a Republican......

[Elsie]

Are you one of the ones who stayed home so we could have Obama as president?

No; probably one of those that TOLD you Romney couldn't win because he ain't smart enough to realize his chosen 'religion' is a CULT!

[Elsie]

And we’re going to get more Romneys and McCains until the cross-party voting in the primaries is abolished.

AMEN!

[Elsie]

There's TWO of you who will say that NOT voting for Romney was a vote for Obama?

Then just WHO got all the votes from the people who DIDN'T vote for OBAMA??

---

2012  Obama: 65,899,660   Romney: 60,932,152

 

 

 

2008  Obama: 69,498,516   McCain: 59,948,323

[Elsie]

Well, at least you admit you’d rather have Obama than Romney.

I see you admit that you have no other tactic than trying to put words in people's mouths.

[FutureRocketMan]

fair enough.

[Elsie]

How about some proof from you that you aren’t a liberal infil-traitor.

That'd be like asking MORMONism, Inc. to produce proof that ANYTHING J.S. ever said was true.

[Elsie]

But conservatives stayed home

Do you REALLY believe this LIE?

Look at the data!

Romney got MORE votes than McCain did, and Obama got 3.5 mil LESS than he did first time!

Just WHO stayed home?

[Elsie]

It is a knife digging around in a wound that is just starting to knit.

But it has shown that infection is just below the surface.

It NEEDED to be lanced!

[Elsie]

...should be rewarded by having this thread pulled.

Oh; NO!!

Leave it as an example to vain posturing!

[Hegewisch Dupa]

Well to answer technically, Obama got the votes for those not voting for Obama; given the vote fraud - but I know that isn’t what you were going for ;)

[iopscusa]

Thanks for the GOPPER Convention details, I remember the Romneycrats sent bogus buses to pick up the RPaul delegates and then drove them away from the Convention Center refusing to deliver them. The Way they treated thes delegates spells the end of the Party of Lincoln the corrupt abolitionist!

[presently no screen name]

Thanks!

[presently no screen name]

You’re right.

[Elsie]

Well to answer technically...

I think you spelling Randomly Guessing wrong.