Posted on 06/17/2013 12:15:18 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Sarah Palin pushed back against Jeb Bush’s argument that decreased fertility rates in the United States meant that immigration reform was necessary.
“I say this as someone who’s kind of fertile herself,” the mother of five told attendees at the Faith and Freedom Coalition’s Road to Majority Conference today. “I don’t think that’s where we want to go in deciding how will we incentivize the hard-working responsible families who want to . . . follow the law and become Americans versus those whose very first act on our soil is to break the law. “
During his speech at the same event on Friday, Bush had said that “immigrants are more fertile,” and noted that the United States was not replacing its population quickly enough.
Palin also derided the Gang of Eight’s proposal. “Let’s not kid ourselves in believing that we can rebuild our majority, by the way,” she urged, “by passing a pandering, rewarding-the-rule-breakers, still-no-border-security, special-interests-ridden amnesty bill.”
Palin harshly criticized the government over the slew of recent scandals, saying that “in Benghazi, the government lied and Americans died.” She also warned about how the Obamacare implementation would necessitate swelling the IRS’s ranks, saying the government would be “hiring up to 16,000 to 20,000 perhaps-armed IRS agents to implement this act.”(continued)
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
Ruh ro, the heathens are getting uppity with the Bushies. Hey Jebbie, go away.
Agenda 21 demoraliAtion, climate change, obamacare, nsa, irs, illegals... we are getting a picture of us being disowned in exchange for some pipe dream. It’s rather insulting to be told by Jeb we must die and let migrants replace us, to say the least.
Palin is not raving here at all, their language of disowning themselves into stark raving lunatic liberal language is becoming clear: kill jews, christians, fertile whites etc... you name it.
Save
Long after John McNutcase has become so addled that even the Alzheimers cases of East Mesa won't vote for him, Palin will still be vigorous and outspoken.
Maybe there's hope after all.
God protect her.
ANYONE on this forum who jumps on a Sarah thread from this day forward with the BS that Sarah is for amnesty like any other rino, or anything resembling amnesty, better think twice because THIS Mama Grizzly has enough interviews and articles from the day Sarah walked on the stage at the republican convention to prove you wrong. I didn’t need to hear it again, but here it is, right here, right now, not five years ago when her words were tweaked and twisted to mean something they didn’t, no ambiguity here and now, no weasel words, no wiggle room, flat out SARAH SAYS NO.
Read it and weep Palin haters. You have less than half an arrow with no feathers left in your quiver and half an arrow won’t fly far or straight. You’re done.
“During his speech at the same event on Friday, Bush had said that “immigrants are more fertile,” and noted that the United States was not replacing its population quickly enough.”
Surely, he didn’t say this....
“During his speech at the same event on Friday, Bush had said that “immigrants are more fertile,” and noted that the United States was not replacing its population quickly enough.”
Actually, it was the only thing he said that made sense, because it is actuarily true. As for the rest of his immigration pitch, it’s just pitching amnesty.
[...noted that the United States was not replacing its population quickly enough.]
Aborting babies have that effect.
Revolt is coming.
Trouble is, there never has been a PDSer that gave a flying freak about facts.
The other day there was one I saw that had facts posted to him over and over. He just ignored it and plowed ahead with his canned 4 year old DU talking points about Palin the amnesty supporter. Her recent speech did not phaze him.
A few of us had a go around today with another ethically flexible feeper who was screaming at us evil purists over the lesser evil/principle thing and how horrible we all are. Then said we needed to vote for people like Palin Cruz.
Of course the fact that Palin/Cruz are all about principles did not faze him. The other day one was going on about what a staunch Romney supporter Palin is/was...And he claims to be a big supporter of hers. He pops up on her threads frequently.
My point is this. “conservatives” in name only sure do enjoy twisting her to their purposed...whatever they may be. And facts be damned.
Close the border, deny benefits and welfare to illegals, and send them home, and reduce the tax burden so the productive can be more re-productive.
Bingo.
Curious, we abort 30 mil.+ potential citizens then import 30 mil. + illegals.
Duh.
Aside the moral religious issues with abortion. (And they are paramount)
He said it in the context of our needing more of the illegal immigration population for economic reasons because of their fertility.
Our current illegal population are massive, demonstrated drains on the nation’s wealth and our native taxpayers as many generations in as we can foresee!
The government wants more tax payers. The entire Ponzi scheme that is our government is reliant upon ever more taxpayers. One alternative is less government but asking these people to shrink is in their eyes tantamount to lessening their power which they won’t stand for.
I’d be happy with fewer people using up our resource,smaller government and absolutely no handouts to any none citizens. We could be as wealthy a nation as we used to be.
Sarah supported Mitt about like Texas voters supported Mitt. Because he was running against, and the only one who had a chance to defeat, Barack Obama. That’s how strongly Sarah felt against Obama. That’s how strongly Texas voters felt against Obama.
Another parallel between the views/actions of Sarah Palin and the views/actions of Texas voters:
Sarah supported Mitt Romney AND Ted Cruz. Texas voters supported Mitt Romney AND Ted Cruz.
Happily, enthusiastically supported Ted. Reluctantly supported Mitt. But supported both.
Walk, chew gum at the same time.
It was all done by people with pure motives. Trying to save us from an Obama despotic regime going on and on. Trying to get a top drawer conservative into the squishy Republican minority in the Senate. Same people, did both.
It doesn’t really matter what this poster you rail against said about Sarah. It’s fine to note it, but it doesn’t matter when searching for the truth. The truth is the truth. It actually happened. It’s clear. It isn’t muddied up. It’s out there. There’s pure-motive reason for it.
One has to twist it, and twist it, and twist it, to use it to some other purpose other than the pure truth, to mix it all up.
And to live off of a grudge against people who with pure motives supported both Mitt Romney and Ted Cruz.
While lauding Sarah Palin and Ted Cruz, yourself. While attacking the Romney voters but not the Cruz voters. When they were and are the same people.
Perhaps, Lord willing, one day you will accept the truth on this. But I daresay you won’t do so while here on FR, because you have a “histoire”, as Rush would say, to maintain and defend.
Reaction to Obama 2012 Election Win - ABC News
You Get Em’,Girl!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Are you sure they want more taxpayers?
They want more of our tax money, but more taxpayers would require a healthy, growing economy which they refuse to provide, and as for immigrants - illegal or otherwise - more taxpayers would require a higher knowledge and skill set than the millions who are not even high school grads who come here and take low wage jobs and use massive resources of others in order to make it.
I’m thinking they want more dependency on the Democrat party and the Democrat party run government, which would translate to more votes for them and fewer votes for the “evil” “right wing” Republicans.
People voted for Romney out of fear. Period. Most of them now regret it.
Palin supported him much less than reluctantly. She was treated like a dog by every level of the GOP and their hardcore romneybot fanbase. Even considering the absolute minimum of backhanded support she gave, I have to think she regrets it too. She sure ain’t screaming it from the rooftops...now or then.
My history is one I stand behind. And as I read here daily, I see more and more people understanding that their mistaken support of the liberal helped move the GOP leftward at a lightning pace. Of course, there are still a few who try to claim that didn’t happen. However the Amnesty bill gives lie to that. Among MANY other things.
Here’s the thing. Do you plan on voting for the next open lib the GOP puts up? Because if you do, then why even claim conservatism? I can understand voting out of fear. Once. I also understand that the results are NEVER good. As we see.
But to make the same mistake again? Really?
Then people would deserve every bit of the hell they bring on themselves. Because now they should know better. And people making excuses for it should be ashamed of themselves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.