Boy, he's never worn a uniform, and it shows! But I thought he was a constitutional law scholar or some such?
To: 2ndDivisionVet; HoosierDammit; TYVets; red irish; fastrock; NorthernCrunchyCon; ...
+
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
2 posted on
06/15/2013 8:29:18 PM PDT by
narses
To: 2ndDivisionVet
But I thought he was a constitutional law scholar or some such? He's a con-law scholar like my 13 year old granddaughter is. The man continues to show a profound lack of common knowledge. This is precisely the lack of law scholarship that caused him to say the Cambridge police "acted stupidly" and that if he had a son "he'd look like Trayvon."
3 posted on
06/15/2013 8:29:22 PM PDT by
jimfree
(In November 2016 my 12 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This is almost as funny as learning that after he helped the Muslim Brotherhood depose Mubarak in Egypt, they made slavery legal again.
4 posted on
06/15/2013 8:31:22 PM PDT by
Dogbert41
(Thy Kingdom come!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
5 posted on
06/15/2013 8:31:36 PM PDT by
bigbob
To: 2ndDivisionVet
RE :”
On Wednesday and Thursday, Fulton approved the pretrial defense motions, which used as evidence comments that Obama made about sexual assault at a May 7 news conference.
The bottom line is: I have no tolerance for this, Obama said, according to an NBC News story submitted as evidence by defense attorneys in the sexual assault cases.
I expect consequences, Obama added. So I dont just want more speeches or awareness programs or training, but ultimately folks look the other way. If we find out somebodys engaging in this, theyve got to be held accountable prosecuted, stripped of their positions, court martialed, fired, dishonorably discharged. Period.
The judges pretrial ruling means that if either defendant is found guilty, whether by a jury or a military judge, they cannot receive a bad conduct discharge or a dishonorable discharge. Sailors found guilty under the Uniform Code of Military Justices Article 120, which covers several sexual crimes including assault and rape, generally receive punitive discharges.....” WOW!
Any word from squeaky Sen Kirsten Gillibrand on this???
I bet not a peep.
6 posted on
06/15/2013 8:36:22 PM PDT by
sickoflibs
(To GOP : Any path to US citizenship IS putting them ahead in line. Stop lying about your position.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I hope that judge has his 20 years in.
7 posted on
06/15/2013 8:39:22 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(The Civil Servants Are No Longer Servants...Or Civil.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
8 posted on
06/15/2013 8:39:32 PM PDT by
Impy
(All in favor of Harry Reid meeting Mr. Mayhem?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; bigbob
All hat, no brainsI prefer "all ego,no conscience".
9 posted on
06/15/2013 8:41:02 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(The Civil Servants Are No Longer Servants...Or Civil.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
10 posted on
06/15/2013 8:45:57 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The President has some responsibilities. He’s not free to offer his comments in a active case, such as the victim looks like my son. He’s not free to offer his opinions in an active case of military justice, concerning the appropriate level of punishment. But, let’s face it, he’s an OJT President, hired on the basis of affirmative action.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Another “acted stupidly” remark...
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I saw this one coming. Incredible arrogance and disregard for the rights of the accused.
Now contrast this with the prosecution of Major Hassan, where the government won’t call it an act of terrorism or an act of war because they don’t want to prejudice the prosecution. (Like it would somehow be prejudicial if the prosecution were found to actually believe the charges they brought against a defendant?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I’m wonderign if he did this intentionally so that no convictions woudl be possible- perhaps he was bribed by military because soem top officials might be invovled too-
14 posted on
06/15/2013 9:49:41 PM PDT by
CottShop
(Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"Politico adds the following: As a lawyer, Obama knows to be cautious in speaking about specific cases"Obama's actions in office indicate to me that his intellect lies somewhere between that of a box of rocks and a bag of hammers. He is simply incapable of making properly informed choices. That goes to his supposed background as a constitutional law professor as well. He taught no law. He simply regurgitated Alinsky talking points that he undoubtedly memorized through repeated usage.
17 posted on
06/16/2013 5:08:11 AM PDT by
norwaypinesavage
(Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Apparently obama thinks he is the law of the land.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson