Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: naturalman1975
I read the article. I did not see any reason to limit the number of firearms that one person could own, other than the opinion of an anti-freedom spokesman that it was “absurd”.

Did anyone give any rational reason to limit the number of firearms owned?

It seems to clearly be a case of “I do not like it, therefore there should be a law against it.”

20 posted on 06/06/2013 6:37:41 AM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

One can not both argue that the Second Amendment merely codified the God given right to self defense and that gun bearing does not have an aim. The Totalitarians that are attempting to deprive us of our rights know exactly at whom the Second Amendment is aimed. They have mirrors.


22 posted on 06/06/2013 11:40:24 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson