Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRS’s Shulman had more public White House visits than any Cabinet member
daily caller ^ | 5/29 | Vince Coglianese

Posted on 05/30/2013 5:26:37 AM PDT by RummyChick

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: RummyChick

The IRS commissioner isn’t even a cabinet member.


21 posted on 05/30/2013 9:08:04 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's next run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Do the White House logs show who the party was visiting? I would assume that even if they visited an aid in the Executive building it would be logged in as a visit. You can get this scandal will get bigger and bigger as the logs are reviewed.


22 posted on 05/30/2013 9:09:21 AM PDT by ncfool (Obama's aMeriKa 2012 can we make it until 2016?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Here is some FUN WITH NUMBERS.

157 visits is the same as visiting someone every day for 5 months.

The Obama administraion has been in office for about 52 months.

Including weekends and holidays, 157 visits over 52 months is about 1 visit every 10 days.

Not including weekends and holidays, 157 visits over 52 months is 1 every seven business days.


23 posted on 05/30/2013 9:12:46 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

24 posted on 05/30/2013 9:32:21 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Shulman either had a weekly “sabotage the Tea Party” meeting, or he’s bopping Omoslem. Or both during each visit.


25 posted on 05/30/2013 10:28:55 AM PDT by LyinLibs (If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

It would be really interesting to cross-reference the dates of his visits with those of say, Valerie Jarrett, David Axelrod, or anyone else, for that matter.


26 posted on 05/30/2013 10:37:45 AM PDT by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Publicly known visits?

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !

If the elected and appointed criminals will not obey the laws and rules that the rest of us are expected to, what makes anyone think they have kept any record of the criminal conspiracies (plural?)

We know at least one agency chief kept a private email account to try to be immune from oversight. What happened to her? No criminal prosecution?

...hello..? is anybody there?

27 posted on 05/30/2013 10:59:38 AM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncfool
Oh Oh! Shulman visited the White House over 157 times? almost double the amount of times of his cabinet members.

What creates a really dark pall over the whole sordid criminal conspiracy, is that THE IRS IS SUPPOSEDLY AN INDEPENDENT, NON-POLITICAL NON-PARTISAN AGENCY!

28 posted on 05/30/2013 11:07:17 AM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
157 days is roughly 2 or 3 days per week, which means someone had a lot of orders to be carrying out.

Verbally. Face to face.
No record, no notes, no trail of any kind.

Of all the perps, Shulman should be the last one to be offered immunity!

(Can't prove it! Na na na na na na na.)

29 posted on 05/30/2013 11:10:56 AM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ncfool
This will get to be very interesting as the records are explored.

How naïve!
What records?

30 posted on 05/30/2013 11:12:16 AM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ncfool
Please make a distinction between the words "consul" and counsel.
Huge difference.
31 posted on 05/30/2013 11:13:40 AM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

ROFL!!!!!


32 posted on 05/30/2013 11:21:29 AM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Total known White House visits

I recall that White House staff were also caught holding a large number of meeting "off-campus", at local bars and restaurants, in an attempt to avoid visitors being listed in the White House log.

And I vaguely recall that numerous meetings of this sort were held with Shulman, specifically, and other high-ranking IRS employees.

33 posted on 05/30/2013 11:22:36 AM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Anyone can find those visitation records, that is not “investigative journalism”...answer the question...”Who was he visiting over 150 times?” Answer that and everything is going to suddenly get crystall clear. I bet a friend $100 I know who it was. Your guess?


34 posted on 05/30/2013 11:28:27 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag ( EVERY DIME Obama Spends is given to him by the Republicans in the House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius911

My bad spelling... Thanks....


35 posted on 05/30/2013 11:30:35 AM PDT by ncfool (Obama's aMeriKa 2012 can we make it until 2016?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: okie01

Here is the article. It was Caribou Coffee shop not Starbucks. http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/01/gop-wants-investigation-of-obama-administration-meetings-outside-white-house/


37 posted on 05/30/2013 11:33:27 AM PDT by ncfool (Obama's aMeriKa 2012 can we make it until 2016?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Here is the article. It was Caribou Coffee shop not Starbucks. http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/01/gop-wants-investigation-of-obama-administration-meetings-outside-white-house/

http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/158903-house-gop-slams-white-house-for-caribou-meetings

1701 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington, DC


38 posted on 05/30/2013 11:36:16 AM PDT by ncfool (Obama's aMeriKa 2012 can we make it until 2016?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ncfool
Do the White House logs show who the party was visiting? I would assume that even if they visited an aid in the Executive building it would be logged in as a visit. You can get this scandal will get bigger and bigger as the logs are reviewed.

C'mon...
How old are you?

Do you really think JFK logged himself in and out of the White House when engaging in trysts?
Same for Willie the First Rapist.

Or when they had "special visitors?"

What makes anyone believe that things are any different today?

39 posted on 05/30/2013 11:48:15 AM PDT by publius911 (Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ncfool
Thanks for digging up the articles.

So, what we have here is:

1. The President's Asst Chief of Staff and soon to be Campaign Chairman is using his private e-mail to conduct official business. That's against the law.

2. He admits in one of the e-mails that the purpose is to avoid the addressee appearing on the White House visitor log. That's against the law.

3. The Republicans have had possession of these e-mails since August, 2012...and have done nothing with them.

4. How many more meetings, with which officials and other "interested parties", were set up "off-premise" to avoid disclosure? Was Doug Shulman -- or any other IRS official -- involved?

Dammit! Ther4e seems to be nothing about this administration which is not corrupt -- to the core.

40 posted on 05/30/2013 2:40:59 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson