Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As Towns Say No, Signs of Rising Resistance to Smart Meters
NY Times ^ | May 18, 2013 | Chris Hooks

Posted on 05/28/2013 7:21:52 PM PDT by opentalk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-58 last
To: arthurus

That’s certainly been true in my case but I’m not sure whether the cause is the meter or endless rate increases approved by the state PUC. They’ve concocted an extremely complicated “base use” mechanism that applies exorbitant charges for every kwh used above the stingy “base” amount of electricity some bureaucrat has decided is the maximum I should use per month. I’m beginning to feel like a character in a Franz Kafka novel.


51 posted on 05/29/2013 8:16:10 AM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

Southern California Edison installed Smart Meters in our area last year. They initially said we could opt out but when it came to it the State Utilities Board allowed them to charge us a monthly $75 fee to have our meter read and $150 per year fine. Who could pay that? So we were forced to have the meter. Our bill jumped 10%. Meanwhile, because of the glut of solar panels companies are springing up to lease solar systems. So we are having a solar system installed on the house which will cut what we pay SCE from $200/month to $40. We will still have a Smart Meter but it’s a little of our own back. I’m sure Edison will make the State outlaw this before long. You all should look into it where you live. Ours is called Solar City.


52 posted on 05/29/2013 12:14:12 PM PDT by athelass (Proud Mom of a Sailor & 2 Marines - Clinging to my Bible and my guns for dear life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

Our solar guy told us they will be increasing revenue because they charge on a 3 tier system. The more power you use the more it costs per kwh. The new meters measure more accurately so you are put into a higher tier faster. In our area it’s pretty much the norm for the bill to go up when the meter is installed. There were lawsuits in Bakersfield over it.


53 posted on 05/29/2013 12:24:48 PM PDT by athelass (Proud Mom of a Sailor & 2 Marines - Clinging to my Bible and my guns for dear life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

I’ll bet they don’t have fluoride either.

The first thing you know, they’ll have cell phones


54 posted on 05/29/2013 12:26:13 PM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....Obama Denies Role in Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: athelass
Where we live they are charging for opt out also, with a continual monthly fee. They will still require you to have the digital meter, only claim they are turning the transmitter off.

I thought we all already paid for meters with stimulus hand outs.

55 posted on 05/29/2013 12:53:33 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

When the utility is able to set up interrupt-able service to your AC (or hot water heater), that circuit is separate from the main circuit feeding current to your house. That circuit will have a remotely re-closeable breaker in the substation, or an extra gadget at your house. We had such service in Sacramento in 1986-1987. The utility company only needs to engage the interrupt-able service provision during peak loads on that part of the distribution system — peaks last only a few hours at most. The tactic is only useful when a bunch of folks opt for the alternate circuit to the AC (or hot water). The governing PUC forces utilities to have installed available capacity for well over 100% of estimated peak load. Thus, there is no incentive for the utility to shut off service except in extreme circumstances. Responses to extreme circumstances would otherwise require amperage reduction (brownout — damaging equipment by overheating) or selective blackouts.


56 posted on 05/29/2013 7:45:01 PM PDT by sefarkas (Why vote Democrat Lite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

It will take all of 30 seconds before the police are monitoring electricity of ‘targets of interest’ in real time, most likely without warrants.


57 posted on 05/30/2013 6:15:08 PM PDT by zeugma (Those of us who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

Or some other aluminum object?


58 posted on 05/30/2013 7:16:22 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (I’m not a Republican, I'm a Conservative! Pubbies haven't been conservative since before T.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson