Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
Let us not succumb to cynicism. It is entirely possible that the editorial board of the NY Times has had a collective epiphany and is now coming down firmly on the side of individual freedom and respect for the Constitution.

It is equally likely that purple monkeys will fly from my rectal cavity and dance the maranga on the nonexistent surface of Hillary Clinton's conscience. The Times wants something. There isn't anything more to it than that.

20 posted on 05/22/2013 4:23:51 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Billthedrill

“The Times wants something. “

I think you have got it. The NYT has been mildly critical at O for not being aggressive enough and their columnists have endorsed the Hush Rush movement. So an open political discussion isn’t a Times priority.


31 posted on 05/22/2013 4:59:44 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Billthedrill
"and dance the maranga on the nonexistent surface of Hillary Clinton's conscience"

Good thing I was not sipping liquid when I read your reply, LOL. Lots of people ignore their conscience, some suppress it...........Hillary murdered hers........

8:}

32 posted on 05/22/2013 5:18:50 PM PDT by AwesomePossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson