Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lois Lerner didn’t say anything today. Why that’s a bad thing for the Obama Administration.
WaPo ^ | May 22, 2013 at 2:58 pm | Chris Cillizza

Posted on 05/22/2013 12:10:59 PM PDT by Red Steel

Oh Lois Lerner, you say it best when you say nothing at all.

As expected, Lerner, the head of the Internal Revenue Service’s tax-exempt office, pled the Fifth Amendment rather than testify today in front of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee about her role in the targeting of conservative groups.

In her silence — she technically didn’t refuse to testify but rather she invoked her right to not incriminate herself — Lerner may have done herself some good, legally speaking, but she didn’t do any favors for an Obama Administration that is doing all it can to snuff the controversy out.

Here’s why.

First of all, Lerner has been, from the get-go, the face of this scandal. But now she is the face AND the voice of it. After today, the entire country — or at least those people paying some attention to the news — will have seen the clip of Lerner saying that she had “not done anything wrong” just before she invoked her right not to answer questions from members of Congress.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

If Lerner cannot extricate herself, legally, from this situation she does not seem the type to fall on the sword for Obama. She seems arrogant, self-absorbed, full of hubris, and believes she is smarter than anyone else. If she feels like her tits are in a wringer she will squeal like a stuck pig....unless Obama threatens her or her family before she speakes.


41 posted on 05/22/2013 1:49:51 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter
She looked high to me, like she had smoked a joint before her appearance. I don't smoke pot but I know glassy eyes when I see them.
42 posted on 05/22/2013 1:56:41 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

Maybe she’s a member of the Choom Gang?


43 posted on 05/22/2013 1:57:21 PM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter
arrogant, self-absorbed, full of hubris, and believes she is smarter than anyone else... a liberal.
44 posted on 05/22/2013 1:58:18 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

How do you invoke the protection against self-incrimination if you “didn’t do anything wrong”? What’s to incriminate?


45 posted on 05/22/2013 2:12:52 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

What did the president know and when did he know it?


46 posted on 05/22/2013 2:13:13 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I still can’t help thinking this a trap of some type; she has voluntarily crawled under the Bus and is pounding on the undercarriage to have the driver take off. Maybe she did this so she couldn’t get fired as just exercising her Constitutional rights is not grounds for termination. Eventually her underlings will have to testify, how comfortable will that be to come to work the next day and have her there glaring out her window at you.


47 posted on 05/22/2013 3:15:09 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Plan "B" is now Plan "A")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

Maybe they gave her a little something to calm her nerves.


48 posted on 05/22/2013 3:19:20 PM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs stay silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TBP

“words matter”
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/09/05/words-matter-amateur-compilation-reel-pits-obama-against-himself/

“most transparent administration ever!”


49 posted on 05/22/2013 3:32:59 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

I understand your point but what is the end game? If she refuses to answer questions she can be held in contempt and sit in jail?I don’t think it would be a good idea at this early stage in the game.


50 posted on 05/22/2013 5:09:29 PM PDT by cornfedcowboy (Trust in God, but empty the clip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


FR is funded solely by the freedom loving folks
who love and use it. TEA Party On!

WE are Free Republic!!! ALL of us!!!
Please Contribute Today! Git R Done!!

51 posted on 05/22/2013 5:59:57 PM PDT by RedMDer (May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBP

She said something about the 5th being there to protect the innocent as well as the guilty from self-incrimination. I guess that means those wily lawyers can make you say things you didn’t mean. Any lawyers out there with an idea on this?

She might have poor legal counsel if they didn’t warn her not to make a speech or, even worse, answer a question.


52 posted on 05/22/2013 10:18:40 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: doc
If you didn’t do anything wrong then why not testify?

What if you were assured by your bosses that what you were doing was completely legal? That there would be no repercussions?

Then.... all of a sudden they point their fingers at you, and you know what will happen.

From what I can tell, Lerner wants immunity from prosecution before she gives further testimony, and that is what happened yesterday between her and Issa. He even mentioned immunity in his response to her.

53 posted on 05/23/2013 6:53:38 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
One strike against Issa.

Was it ?

It seemed like Lerner wanted immunity before testifying, and may have made that decision just before the hearing. So... her (awkward) refusal to testify had to be 'on record' before her counsel could negotiate immunity. It is only logical.

54 posted on 05/23/2013 6:58:10 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
Issa just said that he is “looking in to the possibility of recalling her and that the hearing stands in recess”. It looks like Issa is calling her back in!

AFTER her counsel negotiates immunity from prosecution in return for answering further questions.

55 posted on 05/23/2013 7:00:26 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
I think she was more concerned with 'saving face' by getting the "I did nothing wrong" sound bite out in the media, than anything else.

If she admits she committed a crime and falls on her sword for The One, her punishment will be.. A PROMOTION BY 0BAMA!

56 posted on 05/23/2013 11:28:19 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
I think she was more concerned with 'saving face' by getting the "I did nothing wrong" sound bite out in the media, than anything else.

Which, I think anyone would admit, is very important in the modern (used loosely) world.

If she admits she committed a crime and falls on her sword for The One, her punishment will be.. A PROMOTION BY 0BAMA!

Oh... come on. He wouldn't do something like that.....

Obama picks Victoria Nuland for assistant state secretary, Douglas Lute for NATO

57 posted on 05/24/2013 9:23:18 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson