Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Lied About Editing Benghazi Talking Points
Investor's Business Daily ^ | May 16, 2013 | IBD EDITORIALS

Posted on 05/16/2013 4:51:15 PM PDT by raptor22

Scandal In Libya: A new email dump shows that the White House, contrary to public statements, was heavily involved in editing the Benghazi talking points to remove all references to it being a terrorist attack.

The limited, heavily redacted package of emails released by the administration Wednesday is noteworthy for what the emails don't say and reflect a concerted effort by the White House and State Department not to get at the truth but to put something together to help President Obama in an election two months out.

The email package begins some 67 hours after the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attack on our consulate in Benghazi. It does not discuss the infamous YouTube video that U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice would refer to in her Sept. 16 foray on five Sunday talk shows or that President Obama would refer to six times in a Sept. 26 speech before the United Nations.

The video is mentioned only briefly in the subject line of emails coming out of an important meeting where further revisions were made.

The emails do show that Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes and National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor were alerted that the intelligence community was drafting talking points that as late as 3:04 p.m. on Friday, Sept. 14, still included references to extremists tied to al-Qaida and an "attack."

The terms "al-Qaida" and "attack" were stripped out by 4:42 p.m., and shortly afterward Vietor thanked colleagues for revisions and said they would be vetted "here," as in the White House.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 0pansification; 1984; babythereignmustfall; barrybullshiite; benghazi; benghazicoverup; benghaziemails; benghazigate; dnctreason; gregoryhicks; ibd; ibdbenghazi; johnbrennan; libya; lielielie; maybealottablow; orwell; statedepttreason; susanrice; treason

1 posted on 05/16/2013 4:51:15 PM PDT by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Well if 0bama or his little hand puppet jay carney opened their mouths, you knew a lie was coming out.


2 posted on 05/16/2013 4:59:46 PM PDT by 21st Century Crusader (August 26, 1191)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

lied
good word
hadn’t heard it before
had to look it up


3 posted on 05/16/2013 5:01:40 PM PDT by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Oh, please, I want to see Carney at a press conference tomorrow! Pleasepleaseplease...


4 posted on 05/16/2013 5:03:08 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

The White House lied about everything.


5 posted on 05/16/2013 5:13:16 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
Unfathomable that the Dems would lead a chorus of "The Republicans are politicizing Benghazi"..

What could be more 'political' than NOT telling America there was a terrorist attack so as to ease impact to 0bama's re-election?

The Dems 'politicized Benghazi' from day one.

6 posted on 05/16/2013 5:15:22 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
Within an hour of the release of the emails Obie's talkers were trying to tell US they didn't say what they said.

Amazing.

7 posted on 05/16/2013 5:19:57 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

What is wrong with that building? :)


8 posted on 05/16/2013 5:20:23 PM PDT by SMGFan (SMGfan is not "Sub Machine Gun" fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; markomalley; Clairity; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; ...

IBD EDITORIAL PING


9 posted on 05/16/2013 5:24:51 PM PDT by raptor22 (Visit my blog at True Conservatives on Twitter: http://t.co/IKpP3cwq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Now, focus on WHY.

It wasn’t reelection.

It has to do with why 30+ CIA operatives were in Benghazi.

Gun running to Al Qaeda in Syria.

TREASON.


10 posted on 05/16/2013 5:26:58 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (WHO IS ON THE ENEMIES LIST?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

At 2 recent pressers, Carney was still saying the WH only made one (1) change: consulate to diplomatic facility.

At one, a presser asked him about the 12 revisions, and he obfuscated.

But what can one expect from the WH Team that continued to use the movie trailer excuse for 3 weeks following the Benghazi attacks?


11 posted on 05/16/2013 5:32:34 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 21st Century Crusader

You’re absolutely right. It’d be amazing, a minor miracle in fact, if hussein’s White House ever issued a statement that was completely true. For me, on any given topic/issue whatever hussein or his cohorts in crime state, I figure just about the opposite is true.


12 posted on 05/16/2013 5:33:57 PM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: raptor22; MestaMachine; TigersEye; Marine_Uncle; justa-hairyape; onyx; SunkenCiv; Grampa Dave; ...

Thanks for posting this.


13 posted on 05/16/2013 5:34:24 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach ((The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; granite; GreenFreeper; grjr21; I got the rope; IchBinEinBerliner; jaredt112; JayB; ...

IBD EDITORIAL PING


14 posted on 05/16/2013 5:48:40 PM PDT by raptor22 (Visit my blog at True Conservatives on Twitter: http://t.co/IKpP3cwq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It appears the redundancy factor has set in on this issue.
Of course it is nice to know growing numbers of news feeds of various forms are following this travesty more closely now.
15 posted on 05/16/2013 6:00:08 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Galt level is not far away......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

>>>What is wrong with that building? :)>>>

It’s WHITE, that’s what’s wrong with it. But don’t worry, 0 will have it painted pink.


16 posted on 05/16/2013 6:37:48 PM PDT by kitkat (STORM THE HEAVENS WITH PRAYERS FOR OUR COUNTRY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Of the three stories that are current (Benghazi, AP, IRS), only Benghazi can bring Obama and Hillary down. He can distance himself from the other scandals, and demand the resignation of underlings.

But in the Benghazi incident, the question remains, and must be pressed: “What were Obama and Hillary doing while the attack was going on?” Not talking points, not cover-up. But lack of decision at the crucial time. Lack of support for Americans in danger. Were they listening? Or were they sleeping? How did they spend those hours while four Americans were dying?

But Benghazi has taken a back seat to IRS and AP. The IRS scandal will make people turn against Obama, but he will remain in office, and Hillary will get away clean, as she is not involved in the IRS or AP scandals.


17 posted on 05/16/2013 6:46:47 PM PDT by Rocky (Obama is pure evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Impeachment File on Benghazi Coward B. Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, a legal citizen of the sovereign Nation of Indonesia.


18 posted on 05/16/2013 6:50:57 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Traitor John Roberts' Commune-Style Obama'care' violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking; StopGlobalWhining; Straight Vermonter; Tampa Caver; TChris; ...

IBD EDITORIAL PING


19 posted on 05/16/2013 6:51:18 PM PDT by raptor22 (Visit my blog at True Conservatives on Twitter: http://t.co/IKpP3cwq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
If I recall correctly, the U-Tube video was only viewed a few hundred times prior to 9/11/12. I wonder if Congress could get the IP addresses of the viewers prior to 9/11/12. Might be interesting to see who was viewing it!
20 posted on 05/16/2013 7:16:45 PM PDT by goodtomato (I'm really, really blessed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

I agree. It’s of interest to me as well. But obama would just lie and say he was in constant touch and monitoring the situation. You won’t catch him on that question. Its too easy to dodge. We need to find orders or actions by obama that expose him.


21 posted on 05/16/2013 8:32:47 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

What you say?


22 posted on 05/16/2013 8:40:25 PM PDT by McGruff (It's not the crime it's the cover-up someone once said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

I’m going to round up the usual low-level bullshiiters Rick.


23 posted on 05/16/2013 9:54:44 PM PDT by devolve ( ------- I*ve gotcher magic bullshiite right here 0pansy ---------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
But obama would just lie and say he was in constant touch and monitoring the situation. You won’t catch him on that question. Its too easy to dodge.

He was monitoring the situation - and did nothing? That's as damning as saying he was sleeping. That's my point. Nothing was done to help those people. Was he monitoring and doing nothing, or was he otherwise occupied? It focuses everyone's mind on his most important failure, and on Hillary's most important failure. The famous commercial about the 3 AM phone call comes to mind when you think about the hours during which the diplomatic outpost was actually under attack.

Obama and Hillary had their chance to show what they were made of. An attack went on for hours, and they did nothing.

24 posted on 05/17/2013 2:41:42 AM PDT by Rocky (Obama is pure evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

Yes it is awful to do nothing. But not impeachable.


25 posted on 05/17/2013 5:42:59 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

I guess I’m more concerned about putting blame where it should be - on Obama and Hillary (our next President?) - than impeaching Obama. He can’t blame Benghazi on underlings, and Hillary can’t point to others. They were both in this one up to their ears.


26 posted on 05/17/2013 7:16:52 AM PDT by Rocky (Obama is pure evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kitkat

Black with bling!


27 posted on 05/20/2013 12:08:56 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda¬óDivide and conquer seems to be working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson