Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP defies Boehner on special Benghazi panel
The Hill ^ | 5/14/2013 | Molly K. Hooper

Posted on 05/14/2013 3:56:13 AM PDT by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last
To: markomalley

I’m through with the GOP. But I’ll stay on their mailing lists just to waste there resources.


81 posted on 05/14/2013 1:59:48 PM PDT by Fledermaus (The Republican Party is dead. Let's not pretend otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

I propose a new dictionary term:

Boehner (pro-nounced: Bow-ner): meaning to have no inclination to challenge others. limp-wristed. Feckless. no ability to lead. Also refers to animals without spines.


82 posted on 05/14/2013 2:22:59 PM PDT by Hayzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

“If Gingrich had been Speaker it’s unlikely Obama would have won in 2012.”

Unfortunately Mr. Gingrich is not a virtuous man and can not control his hormone driven behavior.


83 posted on 05/14/2013 3:55:07 PM PDT by Soul of the South (Yesterday is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Cap Huff

Well stated. Sometimes we talk as if we thought we were Obama - don’t like somebody? Off with his head.

The thing that has kept our country stable for more than two centuries is that we rely on procedures carried out by different people at different levels and slowly but surely getting to the truth.

The big worry, of course, is that Obama - who has no respect for our system - has corrupted it very heavily by either ignoring it and thus making people distrust it as powerless, or loading the dice so they always fall on his side, usually by suborning or threatening the people in charge of the various parts of the system.

So I absolutely agree that we have to let the different players do their parts, and that it probably won’t be gratifyingly fast, but we also have to stay on top of it at every moment because I think there has never been a more dangerous time for our republic.

We’ve had bad presidents, lazy presidents, mildly and not so mildly corrupt presidents - but never a crazy president with a dictatorial mindset. Until now.


84 posted on 05/14/2013 4:37:57 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Noamie

Nothing more than a dog & pony show.

Come January the IRS, with the added power of ObamaCare will be grinding us up like cheap hamburger. A couple of years of that & there will be no more token than conservative resistance in this country.

Unless the ObamaCare and the IRS are gutted before January, we are toast. And we all know that the Republicans don't have the b@lls to bring down ObamaCare, even if they can.

The fix is in people. Wise up.

85 posted on 05/14/2013 4:55:12 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Just off the top of my head - some of the MAJOR ObaMao corruptions - leaving out his eligibility or his insanely controversial nominations. Behind each item is a plethora – a book’s worth of infractions:

I’m sure I’m missing other MAJOR seditious events by ObaMao. Feel free to fill in the major issues (but adding the medium and low levels problems would fill a library)

86 posted on 05/15/2013 10:29:56 AM PDT by uncommonsense (Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South
Unfortunately Mr. Gingrich is not a virtuous man and can not control his hormone driven behavior.

He never had alcoholic beverages with pResident Obama either like the present Speaker (or is Sex the only thing on your mind)?

I mean, I'm trying to figure out what you see that's so sexual about this thread.

87 posted on 05/15/2013 10:41:28 AM PDT by tsowellfan (www.cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint; Venturer
“They maintain that the 90-day timeline would allow for administration stonewalling, and with only 19 members on the committee — 10 of which would be the committee chairmen and ranking members of the panels with jurisdiction — said it would be difficult to appoint standout questioners to the select panel.”

Great point! Knowing that, it's probably better to spread testimony across the committees in order to have a broader net. Lies are hard to maintain consistently over time and space.

88 posted on 05/15/2013 11:02:47 AM PDT by uncommonsense (Conservatives believe what they see; Liberals see what they believe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

“I mean, I’m trying to figure out what you see that’s so sexual about this thread.”

I don’t see anything sexual about the thread. My point is that had Mr. Gingrich been more virtuous in his public and private life he might still be Speaker. He would also have been a more viable presidential candidate for many social conservatives. Gingrich did resign in 1999 under an ethics cloud and the exposure of his affair with Calista Bisek who he married a year after his resignation (four months after his divorce). This was his third marriage, both of his prior marriages ending due to affairs he had outside the marriage.


89 posted on 05/15/2013 11:39:34 AM PDT by Soul of the South (Yesterday is gone. Today will be what we make of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Seeya Boner.


90 posted on 05/15/2013 9:58:52 PM PDT by toddausauras (FUBO x 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Yep


91 posted on 05/15/2013 10:05:59 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

A single special committee will be a bottleneck just like the ARB committee Hillary created and the 9/11 Omission Commission... a whitewash. A single “special” entity -like a dictatorship- has a better chance of controlling and limiting both the acceptance into evidence of new info and the outflow of information and shaping the narrative, than if there are multiple investigations headed by different people. Multiple investigations will be scrutiinized by a wider audience. Controlling and containing the results would be like herding cats, which will make it harder for aged “the good old boys” to protect eachother.


92 posted on 05/15/2013 10:20:45 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

bump

So let’s DO this!


93 posted on 06/18/2013 5:52:29 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory, and He will not be mocked! Blessed be the Name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson