Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 12 May 2013
Various driveby media television networks ^ | 12 May 2013 | Various Self-Serving Politicians and Big Media Screaming Faces

Posted on 05/12/2013 3:43:26 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

The Talk Shows



May 12th, 2013

Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Reps. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., and Adam Smith, D-Wash.; Rep.-elect Mark Sanford, R-S.C.

MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Reps. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill.; Sen. Dianne Feinsweine, D-Calif.; former diplomat Thomas Pickering, who helped lead the State Department's review of the attack against the U.S. in Benghazi, Libya.

FACE THE NATION (CBS): Pickering; former Defense Secretary Robert Gates; Sens. Da Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H.

THIS WEEK (ABC): Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Jack Reed, D-R.I.

STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine; Pickering; Reps. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., and Tulsi Gabbard, D-Hawaii.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arb; benghazi; damagecontrol; feinstein; guests; lineup; pickering; sunday; talkshows
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-303 next last
To: kabar

I want to talk to the command in Sigonella Italy.

There was is a huge presence in Rota Spain.
There are folks in Toulon France


141 posted on 05/12/2013 7:43:00 AM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear what is unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
Many of us have been disappointed in Rubio. But, do we really want to Mitt him now when we have no other feasible candidate in the wings? Is that a good wining strategy?

Rand is more credible and has announced his intention. Unless Cruz - my first choice, or Palin - my second, steps forward I'll go with Rand. Rubio is down around 5 or 6. Somewhere below Scott Walker.

I'll throw you a carrot however. Rubio is better than Jeb or Christie.

142 posted on 05/12/2013 7:43:32 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: kabar

I know it was a mission and Hicks was at the Embassy in Tripoli with the Seals wanting to go help a half hour away. Canada had closed their Tripoli Embassy a month earlier and we left ours open and why we would send an Ambassador to Benghazi defies logic.

This was manslaughter and no different from leaving the gate open on a lion’s den. You know what the possibilities of death are and not only do you ignore them, you don’t send help. Who made the Stand Down order?

Then you don’t ask Hicks or the people on the ground what happened and make up a lame excuse? They are so lucky they are Party members like the old Soviet Guard or they would be gone.


143 posted on 05/12/2013 7:43:39 AM PDT by bray (Surviving to spite Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: bray
Only Obama could give that order and he was not sleeping, he was watching the Ambassador get murdered. He is the biggest coward to have ever occupied that desk.

Only President Can Give ‘Cross-Border Authority’
144 posted on 05/12/2013 7:43:50 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: maica

Spot on!

Gregory was way out of his league and Pickering came off badly. Looked smarmy and shifty.


145 posted on 05/12/2013 7:46:12 AM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Lacey; animal172

Who hired Craig Livingston?


146 posted on 05/12/2013 7:46:42 AM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Illegal Immigration is relatively quiet. Hmmmmm. What is in those 800+ pages?

How 'bout a national biometric data base that out does anything in "1984?"

More. And more.

147 posted on 05/12/2013 7:46:59 AM PDT by upchuck (To the faceless, jack-booted government bureaucrat who just scanned this post: SCREW YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

I thought that was the case, so it was the President and why didn’t anyone ask Hicks who gave the Stand Down order or didn’t he know?


148 posted on 05/12/2013 7:48:00 AM PDT by bray (Surviving to spite Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

Here is the wider issue with all of the arab spring BS.

Obama is allowing, and dare I say enabling Al Queda to build a beach head in Africa.
They hold the entire Northern coast of Africa now and this Benghazi gate matter makes us look impotent.

I think This is all purposeful telegraphing of intent on Obamas part.

FUBO!!!


149 posted on 05/12/2013 7:48:06 AM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear what is unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Dick Durban on Disgrace the Nation: The Fox witch hunt continues.


150 posted on 05/12/2013 7:49:26 AM PDT by Rennes Templar (If guns kill people, how come no one dies at gun shows?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

RE sexual assaults in the military.

You are a soldier.
Do something about it besides whine.
Sat No! Put a knee in.

This is BS designed to make all our soldiers pussies.


151 posted on 05/12/2013 7:51:57 AM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear what is unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret
No one in the military chain of command had ordered a mission to Benghazi so in the sense you mean it there was no order to stand down. Someone in the military chain of command did, however,order those troops not to go. We really need to find out who that was and if that person was acting on orders from higher. We need to subpoena Gen Ham, and for other reasons, Gen Petraeus. I also find it curious that both have since lost their positions.

It seems very simply. The military can issue the stand down because the CIC has not authorized CBA. Is it any more complicated than that?

Only President Can Give ‘Cross-Border Authority’
....snip.....

On the other side of the CBA coin: in order to prevent a military rescue in Benghazi, all the POTUS has to do is not grant cross-border authority. If he does not, the entire rescue mission (already in progress) must stop in its tracks.

Ships can loiter on station, but airplanes fall out of the sky, so they must be redirected to an air base (Sigonella, in Sicily) to await the POTUS decision on granting CBA. If the decision to grant CBA never comes, the besieged diplomatic outpost in Benghazi can rely only on assets already “in country” in Libya — such as the Tripoli quick reaction force and the Predator drones. These assets can be put into action on the independent authority of the acting ambassador or CIA station chief in Tripoli. They are already “in country,” so CBA rules do not apply to them.

How might this process have played out in the White House?
152 posted on 05/12/2013 7:52:21 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
I didn't read the Pickering/Mullen report but Pickering said 10 minutes ago that the State Department's “contingency plan”—for the Annex personnel to defend the Consulate in an emergency—worked. People in the Annex, according to reports, were ordered not to help defend the Consulate. This is like the rest of Obama’s Middle East non-policy—let events unfold then, after the fact, pretend like you were in control the whole time. Like Janet Napolitano’s “the system worked” in the underwear bomber event.
153 posted on 05/12/2013 7:57:52 AM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio

So this brings up the question

Where was Obama when the phone call came in?

Hillary does not own this, although she was culpable.
I almost feel sorry for Hillary.

Almost.


154 posted on 05/12/2013 7:58:39 AM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear what is unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

It is Negligence at the least, and Nefarious at the worst.


155 posted on 05/12/2013 8:00:39 AM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear what is unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret; bray

Dempsey is not technically in the chain of command but Panetta relied heavily on his Joint Chiefs. My suspicion is Dempsey advised that the situation did not justify military intervention and Panetta never elevated it to the President. I am confident that Obama had made it clear to Panetta that he wanted “plausable deniability” if anything went south. I do not trust Demsey any more than I trusted Mullen.


I covered DOD for 10+ years, practically lived in the Pentagon at times, and I can tell you that no request for rapid deployment funding would include or even fathom a situation in which an embassy or consulate under siege would NOT be rescued in some manner or form, a paradigm that has existed since Tehran in 1979 if not longer.

Sure. Policymakers can choose to hang embassy people out to dry and NOT attempt a rescue. But the idea that the military would say no to a rescue flies in the face of the entire purpose of special ops, rapid deployment, and all related strategies. Or, the idea that a member of the military hierarchy would go to the Hill and say, “Give us our money, but, no, we can’t even try to save Americans.”

BTW, does anyone remember the last day in Vietnam and the rooftop of our embassy in Saigon? There was an army of 10,000+ bearing down on the city. Did our military hierarchy say, “Well, too bad, we’ll just have to let the diplomats be captured, tortured or murdered.”

Some of the stuff being said by “military” leaders about Benghazi is disgraceful. They should be offering to give the American people their money back.


156 posted on 05/12/2013 8:05:05 AM PDT by PaleoBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: crosslink
The key is no one is asking what NATO assets were available . Per sources two bases within 450 miles had forces that could have responded .

I agree. But once identified, you would then have to go through the bureaucratic requirements to use them. I want a complete accounting of what assets were available. I understand from some who have knowledge that there were other assets that were available that could have prevented the attack on the annex.

It is also know that F-16s from Italy had the range and could have been on station in under 2 hours. Remember no one asked for flyover rights that day. The drone had clearance only because it was asked for prior to the attack.

As the retired general said on ABC, it is not a matter of just getting the keys out and jumping into an aircraft. Flight clearances, mobilization, arming the aircraft, etc. would add time. And according to Panetta and Dempsey there were no tankers available.

Personally, I believe that flight clearances were not asked for political reasons--domestic and foreign. Obama would have has to notify Congress this was happening and there were probably concerns that our bilateral relations with Libya would be harmed, especially if there was collateral damage. And Obama was scared to death of a Desert One replay.

157 posted on 05/12/2013 8:05:35 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: shalom aleichem

Outstanding music and song Shalom.....thank you so much for posting this on Mothers Day.....perfection!

I will surely be listening to this group frequently...I didn’t even know they were out there!


158 posted on 05/12/2013 8:05:40 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bray

Hicks named the Colonel or Lt. Col who gave the order. He told Hicks we’ve been ordered to stand down. Hicks suggested they ask this Colonel who gave him the order (up the chain).

Maybe the next guy will say, “I know nutz-ingk”.


159 posted on 05/12/2013 8:05:46 AM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
Didn't Hicks say his guys were ready to go from the Embassy but were told to Stand Down? Are you saying only the Ambassador or someone other than the President can make that call?
160 posted on 05/12/2013 8:06:32 AM PDT by bray (Surviving to spite Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-303 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson