Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Disabled [retarded married] couple seek life together in group home [banned from living together]
yahoo.com ^ | May 7, 2013 | Frank Eltman

Posted on 05/08/2013 3:14:59 AM PDT by grundle

PORT JEFFERSON, N.Y. (AP) -- With the beaming smiles of newlyweds, Paul Forziano and Hava Samuels hold hands, exchange adoring glances and complete each other's sentences. Their first wedding dance, he recalls, was to the song "Unchained ..." ''Melody," she chimes in.

They spend their days together in the performing arts education center where they met. But every night, they must part ways. Forziano goes to his group home. His wife goes to hers.

The mentally disabled couple is not allowed to share a bedroom by the state-sanctioned nonprofits that run the group homes — a practice the newlyweds and their parents are now challenging in a federal civil rights lawsuit.

"We're very sad when we leave each other," Forziano says. "I want to live with my wife, because I love her."

The couple had been considering marriage for three years before tying the knot last month, and they contend in their lawsuit that they were refused permission from their respective group homes to live together as husband and wife. The couple's parents, also plaintiffs in the lawsuit, said they have been seeking a solution since 2010.

"It's not something we wanted to do, it's something we had to do," said Bonnie Samuels, the mother of the bride.

The lawsuit contends Forziano's facility refused because people requiring the services of a group home are by definition incapable of living as married people, and it says Samuels' home refused because it believes she doesn't have the mental capacity to consent to sex.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; US: New York
KEYWORDS: napl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: 9YearLurker

You need to get up to speed on the modern forms of birth control. It’s not just the pill or condom anymore. There is an implant that lasts for three years at a time. You literally get a shot with the implant, takes about 2 minutes for the whole procedure. Don’t have to think about it until time to replace it.


21 posted on 05/08/2013 5:13:28 AM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to thoe tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

I think you’re right about services for disabled couples.

But I suspect for many group homes for the mentally retarded, things are much easier to handle if they are single-sex.

It’s good to have a variety of things for a variety of people, but not to force everything to be for everyone.


22 posted on 05/08/2013 5:15:12 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Weird.

They cannot function on their own in society yet, they were allowed to enter into a contract and “consensual” relationship?

Either they require care or they do not.


23 posted on 05/08/2013 5:25:05 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: generally

I agree, these parents should have taken the kids in, everybody wants the state to do every folking thing they don’t want to do and that is part of the problem is all these people wanting to make their problem someone else’s problem

I have a millionaire friend whose daughter is practically without a brain and their solution was to get the state to take her on, pixes me off


24 posted on 05/08/2013 5:38:08 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Vendome


'Care' comes in a wide range. Everything from spoon feeding you can changing your diaper to just helping you with balancing your check book and reminding you to pay the bills. Assisted living facilities come in a wide range of flavors too. Love and marriage does not require much physical or mental capability.

25 posted on 05/08/2013 5:39:47 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

“They cannot function on their own in society yet, they were allowed to enter into a contract and “consensual” relationship? Either they require care or they do not.”

That’s way to simplistic of a view IMHO.


26 posted on 05/08/2013 6:21:43 AM PDT by babygene ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

What about the couple in the white house?


27 posted on 05/08/2013 6:23:30 AM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

I see your point. You can’t have mixed singles as it were. Not for the couples sake but for the sake of the single folks.

But homes seem to be expressing an “ick” factor that would have us lableled as bigoted and prejudiced against the disabled. Not to mention paternalistic: she doesn’t know how to consent to sex? Really? You[they] know that how?

Perhaps a “new paradigm” can be created. They love creating paradigms all the time.


28 posted on 05/08/2013 6:28:53 AM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Would it be possible for the parents of the couple to get them an apartment or something?


29 posted on 05/08/2013 6:42:50 AM PDT by pnz1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

You sure can mandate it. It’s been done before for folks with inheritable disabilities.

Aggravates me to no end to see those same ideas defended here.


30 posted on 05/08/2013 6:43:27 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Oh pooh! This shouldn't be a problem, one room instead of two. As far as sex etc., is everyone pretending like handicapped adults (or kids) don't have it? If so please take lessons and join the real world. Whether they are private pay or public assistance should make no difference. This should be a minor problem, why in the world it is being made into such a crisis is what we should really be questioning. Sounds like a typical bureaucratic SNAFU. Kudos to two people who had the decency to marry instead of just “hooking up”!
31 posted on 05/08/2013 7:07:24 AM PDT by pepperdog ( I still get a thrill up my leg when spell check doesn't recognize the name/word Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder

I don’t work with disabled women, but I can imagine having the lack of an ability to consent being a real issue.

It’s okay with me if women-only homes for the disabled choose to stay that way. (Even though already I’m sure they’d be obligated to take in those who ‘identify as’ women, but are men.)


32 posted on 05/08/2013 7:21:05 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I agree. Surely, there is a group home somewhere that will take this couple.

Disabled adults can lead very lonely lives, so the quality of their lives could greatly improve if they have one another.

May God bless them.


33 posted on 05/08/2013 7:31:14 AM PDT by GSD Lover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

And we see many times over that ppl (evidently of higher intelligence) who are required to take their medication on a regular basis, do so religiously...right! What could possibly go wrong?


34 posted on 05/08/2013 7:47:25 AM PDT by SgtHooper (The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

generally they don’t enter into contracts.

contracts for commerce are one thing.

marriage is an institution.
akin to voting rights.

They may never have be adjudicted incompetent enough on THOSE specific issues.


35 posted on 05/08/2013 8:30:32 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SgtHooper

What I posted to someone else who also thinks that the only option of birth control is the pill I guess.

You need to get up to speed on the modern forms of birth control. It’s not just the pill or condom anymore. There is an implant that lasts for three years at a time. You literally get a shot with the implant, takes about 2 minutes for the whole procedure. Don’t have to think about it until time to replace it.

If anything, this makes me angrier at abortions. There are things you don’t even have to THINK about and it will you from getting pregnant. No excuses.


36 posted on 05/08/2013 8:31:52 AM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to thoe tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Adder

the issue must be production of children. If children are produced what does the group home do?


37 posted on 05/08/2013 8:32:23 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Retarded Dims walk the streets and vote. How could this be any worse.


38 posted on 05/08/2013 9:00:52 AM PDT by WhirlwindAttack (There is so much I could say. But I'm smart enough not to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle
I have a retarded aunt.

She is now 86. She was forceps damaged in a hard delivery at a New Mexico road camp in the 20s

Slightly retarded..like touched.

She had boyfriends but nothing beyond playfulness

they were all Downs boys and died pretty young...

these girls are very vulnerable sexually...to say the least

we help take care of her, she's been a joy and keeps on ticking..she is one of only 3-4 older relatives I know have

i’m ambivalent on this

39 posted on 05/08/2013 9:14:34 AM PDT by wardaddy (wanna know how my kin felt during Reconstruction in Mississippi, you fixin to find out firsthand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Good point also.

All of this should have been an issue before they were allowed to be married to the huzzahs of the gathered adoring assemblage. SOMEBODY thought they should be allowed to be married because disabled people are people too!
[Please note the cynical snark here...]

But now they want to treat them as if their little playtime is over. “You had your wedding and, while it was so much fun, you can’t REALLY be married.” The couple is apprently aware enough that they know they are married and they know they should be together.

Manybe Moms and Dads step in and come up with their own home and 24hr care or something. I don’t know.

Do we as a society WANT to encourage people who cannot function on their own get married? I don’t, but someone did. Now that community should do something to let it work out: a small apartment building for couples maybe? Or a dorm type situation?


40 posted on 05/08/2013 9:36:27 AM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson