Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Rep.: ‘Not A Single Democrat’ Went To Libya, State Department To Investigate Benghazi Attack
Mediaite ^ | 5/6/13 | Noah Rothman

Posted on 05/06/2013 7:50:41 AM PDT by Nachum

With whistleblowers coming forward and charging that members of President Barack Obama’s administration actively hindered the investigation into the events leading up to and following the deadly 2012 attack on an American consulate in Benghazi, the political blame game is also taking shape. On Monday, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) appeared on Fox & Friends where he alleged that his Democratic colleagues in the Congress were not interested in the investigation into Benghazi until recently. When asked by the Fox News Channel hosts why some members of the administration appear to have engaged in a cover-up,

(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 113th; benghazi; bho44; coverup; dnc4alqaeda; dncisalqaeda; dncrico; dnctreason; ignoredtreason; libya; soshillary; treason; typicaldnctreason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Full title: GOP Rep.: ‘Not A Single Democrat’ Went To Libya, State Department To Investigate Benghazi Attack
1 posted on 05/06/2013 7:50:41 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 05/06/2013 7:51:04 AM PDT by Nachum (The Obama "List" at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Sample of the power of our communists controlled Administration. And they don’t give a damn.


3 posted on 05/06/2013 7:55:55 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Of course not — they are loyal only to the Party.


4 posted on 05/06/2013 7:56:02 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; SE Mom; Nachum; onyx; ...
We expected no less and got it.

Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.


Benghazi Index

5 posted on 05/06/2013 7:57:42 AM PDT by MestaMachine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Back to the mask for awhile. See ya later.


6 posted on 05/06/2013 7:59:53 AM PDT by MestaMachine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Who found the red herring video?

Who prosecuted the video producer?

Why is he still a political prisoner?

7 posted on 05/06/2013 8:01:56 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I remember seeing Chaffetz (probably on FOX) talking about his trip to Libya and he was visibly upset/disturbed ... and I suspect, at that time, he was glimpsing just the tip of the iceberg.


8 posted on 05/06/2013 8:03:42 AM PDT by MissMagnolia (You see, truth always resides wherever brave men still have ammunition. I pick truth. (John Ransom))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Nothing worse than willful ignorance.

It indicates they knew something was wrong and deliberately avoided learning what it was.


9 posted on 05/06/2013 8:08:07 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Zero - the same number of ‘Rats that examined the evidence archived for Clinton’s Senate trial. Some coincidence.


10 posted on 05/06/2013 8:08:19 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes everything + 969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

They tried to play the old “if a tree fell in the forest”. If they didn’t go, it wouldn’t exist.


11 posted on 05/06/2013 8:12:27 AM PDT by bgill (The problem is...no one is watching the Watch List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
It's called plausible deniablity.
12 posted on 05/06/2013 8:13:16 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

because they all knew what we knew....it was another botched Odungo program


13 posted on 05/06/2013 8:15:04 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
And if we didn't have control of the House, the cover-up would have succeeded.
14 posted on 05/06/2013 8:18:57 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Very good questions


15 posted on 05/06/2013 8:22:35 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

creek, at this point I believe zer0 and hillary thought the plan was going as planned on the night of the attack. Egypt was about to be given a win along with the saudi royals. Much money was about to change hands. Nobody would do anything and very few questions would be asked and / or receive the light of day. It was only after Ambassador Stevens was murdered did the plan fail. This is an opinion. Hostage situation and zer0 and hillary receive compensation for making a deal. Egypt and the saudi royals very happy. Everyone goes home till Boston.


16 posted on 05/06/2013 8:28:39 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority

It’s telling and very revealing when slut Killary at the hearing busted out loudly and hysterically throwing up her arms screaming: “What difference does it make” when she was pressed for answers that she was NOT able to back-up. Definitely a huge COVER-UP, and she skated away “unharmed”!!!


17 posted on 05/06/2013 8:31:13 AM PDT by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Which is why, AWFUL as they are over all, there is a difference between the parties....not enough, but there is some.


18 posted on 05/06/2013 8:33:21 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Any GOP politician appearing on TV should bring up Benghazi during their interview. They need to be “in their face” about this. Don’t wait for the media to bring the issue up...they’re never do it.

What pisses me off is that if things were the other way around, the Democrats would never shut up about the issue. But the Republicans, by and large, remain mum.


19 posted on 05/06/2013 8:33:27 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Democrats: Robbing Peter to buy Paul's vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

What was there to investigate?

THE CORRUPT BASTARDS KNEW EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED WITHIN MINUTES!!!


20 posted on 05/06/2013 8:38:17 AM PDT by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson