Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Aide On Syria's Assad: 'If He Drops Sarin On His Own People, What’s That Got Do Do With Us?'
Weekly Standard ^

Posted on 05/05/2013 7:19:04 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Obama Aide On Syria's Assad: 'If He Drops Sarin On His Own People, What’s That Got Do Do With Us?' Daniel Halper May 5, 2013 10:12 AM

President Barack Obama got ahead of himself and his advisers when he said that Syria using chemical weapons would cross a "red line," the New York Times reports.

“How can we attack another country unless it’s in self-defense and with no Security Council resolution?” an unnamed Obama administration official tells the paper. “If he drops sarin on his own people, what’s that got to do with us?”

But they concluded that drawing a firm line might deter Mr. Assad. In addition to secret messages relayed through Russia, Iran and other governments, they decided that the president would publicly address the matter.

Several officials said they recalled no discussion about the “red line” phrase but suspected that it came out of the election-year conversation about Iran and how far to allow its nuclear program to progress before being forced to take action. It was a concept that was “embedded in people’s prefrontal cortex,” one of the officials said.

While surprised at the president’s use of the term in regard to Syria on Aug. 20, advisers concluded that it had succeeded, at least for a while, since months passed with no chemical weapons attack.

But if the tough rhetoric "succeeded" for a time, it appears to have backfired in the long-run. Because Syria has now apparently used chemical weapons, and President Obama is not willing to do anything about it.

In fact, Obama is now downplaying any sort of response, even before settling on a specific response to Syrai crossing the red line.

“As a general rule, I don’t rule things out as commander in chief because circumstances change and you want to make sure that I always have the full power of the United States at our disposal to meet American national security interests,” Obama commented on Syria, while speaking at news conference in Costa Rica. Then, Obama went on to contradict himself.

“Having said that, I do not foresee a scenario in which boots on the ground in Syria, American boots on the ground in Syria, would not only be good for America, but also would be good for Syria,” the president said.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: israel; russia; syria; syriaredline; syriawar; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
And besides, POTUS has a golf game planned, vacation and tickets to see Beyonce............
1 posted on 05/05/2013 7:19:04 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
POTUS has a golf game planned, vacation and tickets to see Beyonce............

The fact that you didn't even mention that his Bulls are still in the NBA Playoffs, shows just how out-of-touch you really are...

;-)

2 posted on 05/05/2013 7:22:03 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
More evidence that Hussein is NOT the person making the decisions in the White House.

Kind of scary actually — America doesn't know who it is that gives Hussein his instructions.

3 posted on 05/05/2013 7:25:22 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
President Jarrett is reviewing her options and will inform Obama what to say, in due time.
4 posted on 05/05/2013 7:28:37 AM PDT by JPG (Stay strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Red line, shmed line, what difference, at this point, does it make?


5 posted on 05/05/2013 7:28:50 AM PDT by shove_it (long ago Orwell, Huxley and Rand warned us about 0bama's USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

He was only doing a poor imitation of Netanyahu anyway...actually TRYING to sound like a leader.


6 posted on 05/05/2013 7:33:15 AM PDT by MestaMachine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

President Obama is right on this. Why should we be involved in Syria?


7 posted on 05/05/2013 7:35:42 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Why would diplomacy try to avoid public ‘red lines’? Especially on something like chemical weapons? Because terrorists are generally lazy. They would much rather toss a bomb into a pressure cooker, or strap it to a person, than go through the effort to create some extensive remote timed detonation system.

And you can use common household chemicals to create a similar result to militarized chemical weapons. If the terrorists who are attempting to topple Assad can get the US military to topple him for them by killing a few hundred innocents, it is an event that they’re more than willing to fulfill. Not only will the military do their work, but they can sit back and point at the great Satin who is once again bombing innocents, and forcing their way into Islam’s sphere without invitation.

I have no love of Assad, but creating yet another terrorist Mecca after making so many is hardly in our interests.


8 posted on 05/05/2013 7:37:17 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Actually his anonymous adviser is right on this in your opinion. He would appear to originally have been wrong as you see it but is now coming around to your way of thinking.


9 posted on 05/05/2013 7:38:23 AM PDT by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

Now you’ve done it. The neocons are staging a frontal attack on you right is very second.


10 posted on 05/05/2013 7:40:41 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

“President Obama is right on this. Why should we be involved in Syria?”

Now there are two things Obozo and I agree on:

1. Let the Syrians kill each other.

2. We both like arugula,


11 posted on 05/05/2013 7:41:04 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (I'm afraid to go visit any American college because of all the foreign students with bombs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Leading from behind. REMF


12 posted on 05/05/2013 7:41:21 AM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is July 4th, Democrats believe every day is April 15th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

“you can use common household chemicals to create a similar result to militarized chemical weapons. If the terrorists who are attempting to topple Assad can get the US military to topple him for them by killing a few hundred innocents, it is an event that they’re more than willing to fulfill. Not only will the military do their work, but they can sit back and point at the great Satin who is once again bombing innocents, and forcing their way into Islam’s sphere without invitation.”

Excellent what if, and a very probable one.


13 posted on 05/05/2013 7:43:06 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (I'm afraid to go visit any American college because of all the foreign students with bombs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
If He Drops Sarin On His Own People, What’s That Got Do Do With Us?

I don't find anything inappropriate about that comment.

14 posted on 05/05/2013 7:43:17 AM PDT by Notary Sojac (I call it messin' with the kid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The statement amounts to administrational dithering. Action is not required while dithering is in process.

History will determine that Obama lacked the ability to make decisions and dithered as a matter of policy


15 posted on 05/05/2013 7:44:25 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Agreed, a plague on both their houses. No matter who wins in Syria, we lose and Syrian Christians, what few are left, lose even bigger.


16 posted on 05/05/2013 7:48:29 AM PDT by trubolotta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Doesn’t the _resident know he has more options than “boots on the ground?” Maybe he should ask Bill Clinton about the air war gambit.


17 posted on 05/05/2013 7:48:44 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (3 guns when you only have one arm? "I just don't want to get killed for lack of shooting back")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Ah, taking lessons from Hillary. “What difference does it make?”


18 posted on 05/05/2013 7:50:16 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So, if Israel kills a few Muslims that attacking Israel, I don’t think the mooselimb in the whitehut will say those same words.


19 posted on 05/05/2013 7:54:03 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What’s it got to do with us?

For once I agree with Obama!

1. If Muzzies want to kill other Muzzies, I don’t see why we should interfere. Just doing the job Americans refuse to do. I see no upside in getting involved, and certainly no upside that would warrant wasting military resources (paid for by taxes confiscated from people like me at - ultimately - the point of a gun), nor any upside that would warrant wasting the lives of our best young men like my neighbor’s son.

2. Since WWII we’ve never really made any lasting positive difference with such military escapades anyway.

3. The Syrians are depleting their stockpiles of WMD (which could be used against us) - another plus.

4. All the newspaper ink, airtime and bandwidth now being devoted to this conflict and the indecisiveness on Obama’s part, can now become better focused on things that really matter, like his possible upcoming impeachment trial.


20 posted on 05/05/2013 7:57:37 AM PDT by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson