Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Al Qaeda magazine found on laptop of bomber's widow ... traces of explosive residue throughout home
(UK) Daily Mail ^ | May 5, 2013 | Lydia Warren and Snejana Farberov

Posted on 05/05/2013 6:00:49 AM PDT by Zakeet

Complete Headline: Al Qaeda magazine found on laptop of bomber's widow: Suspicion over FBI Tsarnaev's wife grows after radical Islamist files found along with traces of explosive residue throughout her home

Federal officials investigating the Boston bombings have discovered radical Islamist materials on a computer belonging to the widow of the deceased suspect, it has been revealed.

Katherine Russell, 24, has repeatedly claimed through her attorney that she knew nothing about the deadly April 15 bombings allegedly set off by her late husband, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, and his younger brother, Dzhokhar.

However, the discovery of al Qaeda’s Inspire magazine on Russell’s computer, along with the presence of explosive residue throughout their home, have raised new questions about Russell's possible involvement in the act of terror.

According to a government document obtained by NBC News, an analysis of the bombs used at the Boston Marathon and pipe bombs that the Tsarnaevs had allegedly thrown at police may have been built following instructions that appeared in an Inspire article titled: Make a Bomb in the Kitchen of Your Mom.

[Snip]

Authorities are skeptical of her insistence that she played no role in the attack or in helping the brothers escape the authorities following the release of the photographs, the Times reported.

A source told CNN that the bombs were built in the apartment that Tsarnaev shared with Russell and their three-year-old daughter. Residue samples were found on the kitchen table, the kitchen sink, and the bathtub, the source said.

Her silence comes as sources told the newspaper that the fingerprints and female DNA found on at least one of the bombs did not belong to her. Authorities had taken a sample from her this week.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bbevidence; bbjihad; bombing; boston; bostonbombing; muslimwomen; tamerlanwife; terror; tsarnaev; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: CatherineofAragon

I am sure the piece you quoted is in error. He was never arrested for assaulting his wife. He was arrested for assaulting a former girlfriend.

Let’s get the facts straight.


41 posted on 05/05/2013 8:42:25 AM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

"Nothing to see here. Move along. It was just a couple o' wacky Al-Qaeda wannabes. Move along."
42 posted on 05/05/2013 8:45:50 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

If it’s wrong, tell it to the Daily Mail.

Still not able to dredge up any sympathy here.


43 posted on 05/05/2013 8:49:00 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon ( (Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut

Yes. Trying to excuse this young woman as though she were a helpless child simply doesn’t work. She was old enough to know better, and she’s responsible for the choices she made.


44 posted on 05/05/2013 8:52:18 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon ( (Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

http://hollywoodlife.com/2013/05/03/tamerlan-tsarnaev-mugshot-boston-bombing-2009-arrest/

> “Tamerlan had a prior assault and battery charge, years before he planned the Boston Marathon bombing on April 15.”

> “Tamerlan Tsarnaev, one of the men responsible for the Boston Marathon bombing, was arrested in 2009 for hitting his then-girlfriend, Nadine Ascencao, after an argument about another woman. This photo proves that Tamerlan’s violent streak started years before the horrific explosions on April 15.”

> “In July 2009, Tamerlan was arrested for slapping an ex-girlfriend, according to court records. His ex was “crying hysterically” and called 911 to report that she was “beat up by her boyfriend,” Cambridge Police Officer Angela Pereira wrote in the arrest report. Tamerlan told police that his ex “was yelling at him because of another girl (presumably future wife Katherine Russell).” Tsarnaev stated at the time, “Yes, I slapped her.” He said that he struck the left side of her face.”

> “Tamerlan’s charges, assault and battery, were dismissed before trial, according to Mail Online.”

> “Nadine has since said that Tamerlan was obsessed with Islam, she was afraid to leave him and he tried to “brainwash” her.”

> “I went to his mosque a couple of times and even looked into converting to make him happy. I thought, ‘This is crazy’ — but I still did it for him,” Nadine told The Sun. “Tamerlan had taken my virginity and said he loved me because I was pure and hadn’t been with any other guys. I was in love and scared he’d leave me if I didn’t do what he said. Looking back I had a lucky escape.”

> “Eleven months after the charges, Tamerlan married Katherine after convincing her to convert from Christianity to Islam.”
____________________________________________________

To not have sympathy for her is entirely understandable. But look at what is reported that the ex-girlfriend said”

“I went to his mosque a couple of times and even looked into converting to make him happy. I thought, ‘This is crazy’ — but I still did it for him,” Nadine told The Sun. “Tamerlan had taken my virginity and said he loved me because I was pure and hadn’t been with any other guys. I was in love and scared he’d leave me if I didn’t do what he said. Looking back I had a lucky escape.”

Young women can be easily fooled and charmed. The point to be made here is to broadcast loud and clear to young women in America and beyond to not have anything to do with Muslims unless such Muslims renounce Islam and convert to Christianity or Judaism.

Here’s a real life story put to the Hollywood screen about how charming Muslim men can be to women, impregnate them and then gradually and eventually at a quickened pace cause them to convert even against their will.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_Without_My_Daughter

The story and film also describe how immensely difficult it is for a woman to escape Islam once taken in.

A film should be made of Katherine (without any benefit to her) and shown to every teenage girl. Her story needs to be told. And if her attorney demands money for her story with her approval, I say fry her on the chair as an accessory to mass premeditated murder.


45 posted on 05/05/2013 9:12:48 AM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

No, it wouldn’t be normal for most rebellious teens but some like to take it to extremes.


46 posted on 05/05/2013 9:37:48 AM PDT by bgill (The problem is...no one is watching the Watch List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Wow, Al Qaeda magazine. I heard that the centerfold is an exploded view of an exploding explosion. In their fashion section, black is in for the 5th century in a row.


47 posted on 05/05/2013 9:41:15 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Yes, I’ve seen the movie—more than once, actually.

Teaching teenaged girls about the trap that is Islam is a fine idea, but where were Katherine Russell’s parents? If the family was indeed Christian, you would think the girl might have grown up with a knowledge of that particular truth. You might expect that the mother and father would have reacted with horror to the revelation that their daughter planned to renounce Christianity in order to marry a medieval savage.

Yes, it’s hard for a woman to escape Islam once she’s ensnared, but the woman makes that choice of her own free will. “Not Without My Daughter” was made in 1991. In today’s world, a woman who makes such a choice does so through willful ignorance.

Being easily charmed is one thing. If Katherine Russell was indeed a Christian, and if she renounced Jesus Christ for a Muslim husband, that’s more than foolish-—it’s evil.


48 posted on 05/05/2013 9:44:48 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon ( (Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

She probably bought the pressure cookers and she knew damn well what was going on.


49 posted on 05/05/2013 9:59:23 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon; Hostage

<> Not even his arrest for violently assaulting her in 2009 could change that.<>

That Daily Mail sentence was incorrect and subsequently corrected. That was a different girlfriend that he assaulted in 2009 — not Russell.

However if this Daily Mail story is correct, then the hijab honey better cough it all up because the FBI have the content of her phone calls, including the one where she alerted her terrorist husband:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2319789/ALL-phone-calls-US-recorded-accessible-government-claims-FBI-agent.html


50 posted on 05/05/2013 10:32:10 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

Public school teaches that Christianity is not inclusive whereas the ‘State’ is obligated to include all cultures, in other words ‘tolerance’.

I am sure her parents and family were shocked at what she was doing as it unfolded what a strange person he was. But so many American families are susceptible to this because they are taught to be ‘inclusive’ and ‘tolerant’. In my opinion these attitude and social agreement have to change.

Here’s the real Betty Mahmoody and her daughter:

http://www.chasingthefrog.com/reelfaces/notwithoutmydaughter.php

Now look at the Wiki summary that I linked to you in a previous post and you will see that the writer of that post is crazy. He really sticks in his ‘social attitude’ to the film ‘Not Without My Daughter’. And he also references film critic Roger Ebert who noted the film made “moral and racial assertions that are deeply troubling” and that it “does not play fair with its Muslim characters. Now I look at what Ebert said and I want to throw up. It captures everything wrong with our media, our government, our schools and our society today. We are blamed for our witness to the truth. Instead our government, schools, media and society should be putting Muslims on the hot seat again and again to demonstrate their allegiance to our Bill of Rights and our universal American values. It will never happen until we stop being pushovers and start demanding Muslims show us compliance and not the other way around.

If I had been Katherine’s father I and a few of my Marine Corps family members would have taken this puke Tamerlan for a drive and read him the riot act. But that’s the old America, the old John Wayne America.


51 posted on 05/05/2013 10:32:45 AM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
That's the first photo I've seen of her where she didn't have a smirk on her muzzie mug. Her family must be real proud. "Oh honey, you've joined the death cult! We are so proud!"

How do you like this: Typical muzzie abuse as well. Wow, honey. We are so proud you chose to marry a muzzie! They treat woman so well!

Tamerlan Tsarnaev abused Katherine Russell with taunts of ‘slut’ and ‘prostitute’ during courtship: roommates

52 posted on 05/05/2013 10:35:44 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Someday our schools will teach the difference between "lose" and "loose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

I don’t buy the she was beaten angle....I think she was very willing.


53 posted on 05/05/2013 10:37:47 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
Sometimes you have to get stuff done before wifey gets home.


54 posted on 05/05/2013 10:46:43 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

“Not exactly convincing evidence. It means she doesn’t dust and let’s her husband use her computer.”

While she was at work 80 hours a week as a nurse’s aide.


55 posted on 05/05/2013 11:49:27 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
"“Katherine Russell, 24, has repeatedly claimed through her attorney that she knew nothing about the deadly April 15 bombings....” . Lying becomes like second nature when one converts to islam."

Spare her. She knew nothing about the April 15 bombings because the brothers decided to do it at the last minute.

Now ask her about July 4 bombings.Chances are she knew about that one.

56 posted on 05/05/2013 12:03:46 PM PDT by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Following his arrest, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev told police that he and his older brother built the pressure cooker bombs in the basement of the Cambridge residence.

First I'd heard that.

The residence was 410 Norfolk Street, Apt 3, Cambridge, MA 02139. So, that would mean it was the basement of the building, not of their residence.

That supports her case. They probably handled the materials in the apartment, then decided to move the assembly activity to the basement in order to hide it from her, while taking greater risk that someone else with access to the basement might discover them.

As for the magazine on the laptop, they'd have to prove she downloaded it. That will be hard unless it was set up with multiple accounts, which is unlikely. I doubt she took it to her home health aide job. That likely means the brothers had unfettered access to it while she was supporting the household working 80-hour weeks.

57 posted on 05/05/2013 12:24:34 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Thank you. I wasn’t aware the UK article was incorrect.

This is going to get very interesting. “Hijab honey?” LOL.....


58 posted on 05/05/2013 1:48:25 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon ( (Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
"Now look at the Wiki summary that I linked to you in a previous post and you will see that the writer of that post is crazy. He really sticks in his ‘social attitude’ to the film ‘Not Without My Daughter’. And he also references film critic Roger Ebert who noted the film made “moral and racial assertions that are deeply troubling” and that it “does not play fair with its Muslim characters. Now I look at what Ebert said and I want to throw up. It captures everything wrong with our media, our government, our schools and our society today. We are blamed for our witness to the truth. Instead our government, schools, media and society should be putting Muslims on the hot seat again and again to demonstrate their allegiance to our Bill of Rights and our universal American values. It will never happen until we stop being pushovers and start demanding Muslims show us compliance and not the other way around.

I agree with you one hundred percent. And you're right, the Wiki article made my head explode. Every one of those lunatic reviews completely ignored the fact that it was a TRUE STORY.

"If I had been Katherine’s father I and a few of my Marine Corps family members would have taken this puke Tamerlan for a drive and read him the riot act. But that’s the old America, the old John Wayne America."

Yes. And a much more honorable, righteous one it was.

59 posted on 05/05/2013 2:02:29 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon ( (Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
That was my thought. He certainly could have used a computer that was hers. My other thought was that anyone stupid enough to dress in Muslim costume and be inducted into the Killer cult is probably stupid enough to help him build a bomb.

Or stupid enough not to really notice what he was doing.

Hard to say.

60 posted on 05/05/2013 11:47:09 PM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson