Posted on 05/01/2013 12:06:27 PM PDT by fishtank
Is Mankind Getting Dumber? by Brian Thomas, M.S. *
Do today’s children have lower I.Q.’s than yesterday’s? Yes, according to measurements of intellectual and emotional strength gathered from different countries and contexts. The results show the same basic decline and resist the notion that public or other forms of education are to blame. Could the cause instead lie within?
Stanford University professor Gerald Crabtree thinks so. He published a pair of essays in the journal Trends in Genetics, citing new discoveries that show why the human intellect is “surprisingly fragile.”1 This biblical creation-friendly notion didn’t sit well with the authors of a rebuttal paper, who countered that the human intellect is “robust.”2 What lies at the heart of this disagreement—bad science or bad assumptions?
Crabtree identified two fundamental processes as the main culprits. First, human intelligence uses neurons, and these cells can only function properly if their genes stay in top shape. Second, these genes are susceptible to degradation. This loss of organization occurs continually as mutations slowly, irreversibly garble genes, and the resulting errors pile up and are not corrected.
Our brains use 2,000 to 5,000 so-called Intellectual Deficiency (ID) genes, according to Crabtree’s estimate. Geneticists routinely identify specific mutations in ID genes as the causes of various types of mental retardation and similar intellectual syndromes that arise during imperfections in brain development.3 Proper human intelligence requires at least one clean copy of every ID gene.4 Like a missing wooden slat in a very long rope bridge, a mutant ID gene challenges the brain to carefully “step over” the gap on its way to developing the biological infrastructure for healthy intelligence.
Each new generation accrues about 60 new mutations to the gene-coding DNA regions of the human genome. Crabtree applied this rate to calculate that “every 20-50 generations we should sustain a mutation in one copy of one of our many ID genes.” As a result, “in the past 3000 years then (~120 generations), each of us should have accumulated at the very least 2.5-6 mutations in ID genes.” Accordingly, the human intellect “perhaps reached a peak 2000-6000 years ago.”1
This appears to confirm three lessons that can be drawn from the Bible. First, Adam and Eve’s brains were originally “very good.” Second, we had our best brains about 6,000 years ago. Third, humanity has suffered genetic degradation since then under the Curse.5,6
Some who wish to reject Scripture work hard to find ways to excuse Bible-confirming data from their own field of genetics. The authors of the technical rebuttal argued that Crabtree overestimated the true number of ID genes, but they did not offer data supporting an alternative number, nor did they explain why fewer ID genes should cancel Crabtree’s conclusion. The rebuttal team also rejected the idea that ID genes are susceptible to mutational buildup on the basis of “genetic theories regarding the evolutionary dynamics of deleterious mutations” and on the results of a computer model that illustrated how genes can increase in number assuming hypothetical evolution-friendly parameters.2
Both Crabtree and his detractors tried to extrapolate some set of numbers to make conclusions about the unobservable past. The rebuttal authors who resist the genetic-decay principle hand-picked numbers that support evolutionary history. Crabtree instead used numbers collected from real-world studies. And those studies present an ever-clearer case for a human race that was very good at the start, but is steadily falling apart.
References
Crabtree, G. R. 2013. Our Fragile Intellect. Part I. Trends in Genetics. 29 (1): 1-3.
Kalinka, A. T., I. Kelava, and E. Lewitus. 2013. Our Robust Intellect. Trends in Genetics. 29 (3): 125-127. One example is mental retardation caused by mutations in “Aristaless–related, homeobox” protein, expressed in developing nervous tissue. See Strømme, P. et al. 2002. Mutations in the human ortholog of Aristaless cause X-linked mental retardation and epilepsy. Nature Genetics. 30 (4): 441-445.
Generally, each parent supplies one copy of each gene, totaling two copies for each person. Brain cells that inherit one clean and one mutant copy of an ID gene often access the clean copy and sequester the mutated copy.
Tomkins, J. Genetics Research Confirms Biblical Timeline. Creation Science Update. Posted on icr. org January 9, 2013, accessed February 28, 2013.
Thomas, B. 2012. Human Mutation Clock Confirms Creation. Acts & Facts. 41 (11): 17.
* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the Institute for Creation Research.
Cite this article: Thomas, B. 2013. Is Mankind Getting Dumber? Acts & Facts. 42 (5): 17.
You can pick ANY start point. Humans today are taller, smarter, healthier and live longer.
We dig up human remains from all over the world and from many different times in human history. The average height made them shrimps compared to modern humans.
Height and intelligence are strongly correlated.
Our grandfather's generation, in their prime some 50-75 years ago (for most) were not as tall or as smart by any measure.
So YOU pick the time points.
And humans are not branching into sub-species. People have always mated associatively for height and intelligence and any number of other traits. Human populations are becoming less isolated as social taboos and cheap and easy worldwide travel have led to massive mixing of people.
A lot of white folks are embracing it as well.
Stupid people would starve and/or fail to reproduce.
God created survival-of-the-fittest and we must also obey it - one way or another.
No - just the leadership.
You mean the people that brought you the renaissance?
Watching NBC news your would think so.
The average Florintinian circa 1500 or so wouldn’t be a Leonardo or Benvenuto or a Machiavelli. Just as the average human today isn’t a Steve Jobs.
“Our grandfather’s generation, in their prime some 50-75 years ago (for most) were not as tall or as smart by any measure.”
The average Euro-American is shorter today than 150 yrs ago.
http://research.duke.edu/blog/2010/10/getting-shorter-and-fatter
There is no question that people across the world are getting higher IQ scores over time, to the extent they have to regularly re-norm the tests.
Why this is happening and what it means is a damn good question.
Well, no. The average American is 2 inches taller than then. But the average Euro is 8 inches taller than then.
We haven’t increased our height as much, probably because we were considerably taller than Euros back then.
In WWI multiple people commented on how the rankers in the British Army looked like a different people from the much taller and healthier officers. Malnutrition, probalbly.
You didn’t even click on the link did you?
Winston Churchill made it a point of argument because the average (mostly lower class) Englishman was of such inferior physicality than the average American.
Who knew 'Idiocracy' was a documentary?
Well, actually I did, since it’s where I got the stats I replied with.
During the Colonial times, Americans were the tallest in the world. In the case of the Industrial Revolution and the Antebellum Era, the heights of people in the industrialized countries were shrinking even when the average incomes were increasing.
“Total average height decreased during these periods; however this was not the case if you consider only the richer people. This was primarily because they were able to pay for their nutrition even when the prices of food were going up.”
“His research showed that the average height of the Dutch increased by almost 8 inches since the middle of the 19th century, compared to an increase of just 2 inches in the height of Americans.”
IOW, both Americans and Dutch are taller than 150 years ago, but Americans aren’t as MUCH taller, which is what I said.
Yes, because the stupid and weak ones don’t get eaten by animals anymore.
Yes, if our governments have anything to say about it.
““Total average height decreased during these periods; however this was not the case if you consider only the richer people. This was primarily because they were able to pay for their nutrition even when the prices of food were going up.”
I think you are taking that out of context.
That wouldn’t square with Americans being their tallest in the 1700’s, and they sure weren’t eating better or had better healthcare back then.
Every single study says Americans are getting shorter, not that Europe is getting taller. Europe may be getting taller, but that doesn’t have any effect on us shrinking.
Ping to self for future entertainment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.