did Brown assess that he couldn’t beat Markey cuz Markey is not fruit loopie like Martha? Plus the surprise factor is gone.
Gomez beat the liberal GOPer, Sullivan. 55 to 30 to 15 for Winslow (the more conservative)
I cannot confirm those numbers.
Polls show Brown could have won, he lead Markey. Wussed out? But talks of running in NH? Bizarre. Despite being a more Republican state by a mile I’d surely say he has much less of a chance carpetbagging there and winning.
So Winslow, the state Rep., he was the most conservative? I didn’t even bother to look into him. I didn’t figure there were any in the General Court.
Jack E. seems like a bigger d-bag than Gomez, if I were to support a d-bag it would be the one who would get 40% rather than one that will get 1%, there is also a Libertarian on the ballot, Fishman, I think he’s run before.
And Lynch can go, to hell. Is he gonna challenge Markey in the primary for the full term next year?
Gomez got 51%, Sullivan 36%, and Winslow 13%.
On the Jackass side, Malarkey beat Lynch 57.4% to 42.6%.
www.politico.com/2013-election/results/senate/primary/massachusetts/
I voted for Sullivan in the primary. I thought about voting for Winslow, but he, like Gomez, had a history of contributing to Donks. Plus, he looked like the last-place guy going in, so it seemed wiser to back Sullivan.
I'll be voting for Gomez in the general, even if it means Malarkey will still be my Congresscritter if Gomez wins (not likely). On the optimistic side, maybe Malarkey will retire out of depression if he loses.