Today would be a great day to support the resistance! [FReepathon thread XXII]

Click here to pledge your support via secure server! ^ | April 25, 2013 | Jim Robinson

[TheOldLady]

Great job, Onyx and Jaz!

Cute little Goldilocks, too.

[RedMDer]

FR is funded solely by the freedom loving folks who love and use it.
Stand with Free Republic.

[onyx]

Freedom is never more than one generation from extinction. --Ronald Reagan



Please Support Free Republic Today!

[RedMDer]

FR is funded solely by the freedom loving folks who love and use it.

[onyx]

LOLOLOLOLOL

[RedMDer]

That shows RINOs can’t win. True Americans can win.
God Bless Ronnie.

[RedMDer]

[onyx]

TYVM.
The picture is adorable and I love jaz’s message!

[RedMDer]

"Well, one of the worst mistakes anybody can make is to bet against Americans."

Ronald Reagan (1911 - 2004)
40th president of US

[DJ MacWoW]

Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

[onyx]

Stand with Free Republic!

"Defending God, Country, Liberty also means defending our BORDERS!!

Without borders we have no country!!

The Gang of Eight are a gang of traitors!!

McCain, McGrahamnesty, McRubio, et al, are shameful disgraces to our Senate,
to our Republic and to our chances of continued Liberty!!"
~Jim

PLEASE CONTRIBUTE TODAY!

[DJ MacWoW]

Click The Pic To Donate

I don ‘t know about you, but I am impatient with those Republicans who after the last election rushed into print saying, “We must broaden the base of our party”–when what they meant was to fuzz up and blur even more the differences between ourselves and our opponents.

It was a feeling that there was not a sufficient difference now between the parties that kept a majority of the voters away from the polls. When have we ever advocated a closed-door policy? Who has ever been barred from participating?

Our people look for a cause to believe in. Is it a third party we need, or is it a new and revitalized second party, raising a banner of no pale pastels, but bold colors which make it unmistakably clear where we stand on all of the issues troubling the people?

Let us show that we stand for fiscal integrity and sound money and above all for an end to deficit spending, with ultimate retirement of the national debt.- CPAC 1975

[RedMDer]

Free Republic stands for God and Country!!
Stand with Free Republic.

[RedMDer]

PREFECT! © BTTT!

[RedMDer]

You are on a Roll!

[DJ MacWoW]

He sure told the truth and cut to the chase.

[DJ MacWoW]

“It's time we asked ourselves if we still know the freedoms intended for us by the Founding Fathers. James Madison said, "We base all our experiments on the capacity of mankind for self-government." This idea that government was beholden to the people, that it had no other source of power, is still the newest, most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man. This is the issue of this election: Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American Revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves. (October 27, 1964)” Ronald Reagan

Click The Pic

[RedMDer]

Another reason why RINOs don’t win. There is no clear difference between a RINO and a Rat.
Reagan stood proudly by his values and won big time.

[RedMDer]

Support Free Republic - Click it

With Freedom Under Assault, We're Told We Must Moderate?
Moderation is not a substantive belief. This is my problem with moderates. There isn't a core there! Moderation is a tactic. It's not a set of principles. It is a tactic that says, "Regardless of the situation, regardless of events, my first impulse is to find a different way around." I know moderation, per se, is illogical because there are clearly times when it is self-destructive or counterproductive. For instance, moderation after we were attacked at Pearl Harbor would have been irrational. Moderation against slavery would have been immoral. How do you debate the issue of moderation if it has no core? You wind up debating tactics, but tactics without principle are pointless -- and this has always been my problem with moderates. ...

Particularly in the face of the most radical and destructive administration in modern American history, where the president has said he wants to fundamentally transform the nation, what does moderation look like? Where am I supposed to moderate? What am I supposed to moderate? Are all these Republican candidates tonight at the debate be asking themselves, "Who's willing to go further in compromising with the Democrats?" To show what? To accomplish what? Isn't the purpose of this debate tonight for one of these people to stand head and shoulders above everybody else in demonstrating he or she is the one who can beat Obama?
Republican moderates are guaranteed losers in eight out of ten elections you're gonna have. Now, I think that people who write pieces about "moderation" need to do a little bit more than just sit back and be critical. We need to know what it is these moderates think is worth fighting for. Is it just winning elections with whoever can win so that the result may not even be productive? These moderates need to tell us what are the principles that they believe that an individual or a nation should stand firm on, because, so far, moderates don't do that. That's why they are moderates! They don't want to be tied down. They want to be able to preach moderation because it gets them praise.

[DJ MacWoW]

Exactly. Republicans have become newborn Democrats.