Posted on 04/23/2013 11:18:04 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
You are definitely trying to use alinsky tactics, so yes I’ll agree, you’re an agent provocateur trying to squelch the facts. I appreciate your finally admitting it.
Alinsky tactic: FR translation - Waaaaah! He’s mocking me! Waaaaaaah!!!!
Someone call a Whaaambulance! We have a conspiracy loon down on aisle 3!
Lighten up Francis!
Ignore them. Their pattern is to keep some distracted, some disgusted enough to leave, and the rest of us talking to no one but ourselves. Btw, if i was hiring them, I’d hire a bunch of women. We’re better at touching off testosterone buttons. lol!
T buttons?
hee hee hee
“Would you accept the open testamony of a now retired FBI department head? ... Probably not. You have an agenda to serve so truth means nothing to you.”
Ok, you post a video from the notorious Ted Gunderson, without realizing that it buttresses my point that you are delving into kooksville. Maybe you don’t realize this, but Gunderson has less than zero credibility left at this point. I’d actually trust Alex Jones before him.
As for an “agenda”, everyone has one, at least I am open about mine: I don’t want FreeRepublic to turn into another haven for non-productive conspiracy mongering that makes conservatives look like lunatics.
Frankly, the kook Alex Jones is more credible than you are. Was Ted Gunderson the head of the LA FBI office? Your desire to have us believe Ted Gunderson was a nutter says more about you than perhaps you should have reveal so quickly. By checking on the data Gunderson has shared with the public, I am convinced that he was more genuine than anonymous accusers like you are. Did he have a few perspectives that might not be totally accurate? I suspect so, just like most folks, even FBI agents. Assissinating the character of a dead FBI agent isn’t a way to endear yourself with folks at FR.
Obviously, my assessment that you don't know much about Gunderson was accurate. You really should check up on him before you try to paint him as a credible source to people who know better.
This is a guy who said:
Oklahoma City bombing was an FBI set-up
The CIA is involved in satanism and ritual child abuse
Jet contrails are really "chemtrails" being used by the government for poisoning/mind control
There are over 500 satanic cults in New York City that commit 4,000 ritual murders a year
So, this is the man you are holding up as a credible source? Puh-lease.
You just did the alinsky shuffle, repeating your talking points character assassination while not answerting the question. Gunderson WAS the head of the FBi LA office. When he began exposing FBI mistakes a concerted effort to assassinate his character was launched and you’re repeating several of the talking points used then. Keep going, you’re exposing yourself as an agitprop/agent provocateur all the more.
Wow, you really going off the deep end here. Anyone who doesn’t agree with kooky conspiracies is automatically an agent of the conspiracy, eh? Sure, that makes total sense.
Let me clue you in: it isn’t character assassination when you just repeat the things that the man actually said. He said them publicly, repeatedly, and they are on tape. He discredited himself; there was no need for any government agent to waste their time trying to do that.
I also find it hilarious that you accuse me of slandering an FBI agent, when that agent, and now yourself, slander thousands of other agents with your conspiracy mongering. Remember when you point that finger, three are pointing back at you buddy.
You have learned your techniques well. But you’re not going to squelch me with your amateur efforts to shame or marginalize. However, your agenda to divert the thread into a spitting contest will no longer be enjoined. Have nice day, comrade
Divert the thread? There’s nothing to divert. In case you haven’t noticed, nobody on FR is interested in this crap because nobody else is commenting.
I halfway agree. Where we differ is that I do not see him leaving at the end of this term. Maybe he will. Maybe he won’t. Should he decide to stay, who will oppose him?
After scrolling down the responses to your thread, one thing for certain is you flushed the judas goats from cover.
There are a lot of people qualified to take his place. There are few that want to put up with what the MSM and POLs would do to their personal life. (as well as the pay cute they would take) So until we "fix" that, we are stuck with horrible candidates. But a horrible candidate would be worlds better than the Traitor who currently sleeps at 1600 Penn. Ave. The very survival of the nation depends on repairing the Party system. Daylight on illegal activity is the cure short term.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.