Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: stevie_d_64
“Paging Captain Obvious...Captain Obvious to the Red phone for important information...”
2 posted on
04/22/2013 12:51:41 PM PDT by
stevie_d_64
(It's not the color of one's skin that offends people...it's how thin it is.)
To: stevie_d_64
Oooooh, they’re in big trouble now.
3 posted on
04/22/2013 12:51:53 PM PDT by
dfwgator
To: stevie_d_64
No license for Jihad either.
4 posted on
04/22/2013 12:51:55 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: stevie_d_64
They had no permits for the bombs either (per Mark Levin).
5 posted on
04/22/2013 12:52:29 PM PDT by
nhwingut
(This tagline is for lease)
To: stevie_d_64
Did they have a bomb license?
7 posted on
04/22/2013 12:53:29 PM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: stevie_d_64
You mean they broke existing gun laws?
So it’s obvious... we need more laws. If we have more laws, then maybe the next group of terrorists will feel obligated to follow them.
8 posted on
04/22/2013 12:53:38 PM PDT by
Not A Snowbird
(The Cardinals chose wisely.)
To: stevie_d_64
I bet they had an outstanding parking ticket, too.
To: stevie_d_64
OMG............no way! You mean to tell me these two evil b@st4rds who “allegedly” built bombs didn’t go thru the correct channels and get gun permits?....oh the horror!
major sarc.
12 posted on
04/22/2013 12:55:51 PM PDT by
ColdOne
(I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
To: stevie_d_64
Massachusetts state law allows residents under 21 to have rifles, but only those weapons holding 10 rounds of ammunition or less, and only then if the holder has a police-issued ID card. The guy was willing to set a bomb next to an 8 year old boy and his 6 year old sister and walk away, knowing what would happen to them. He's a murdering, maiming TERRORIST ....like he really gives a flying flip about obeying the law regarding an ID card or a weapon only holding 10 rounds or less? So let's crack down even harder on those that DO obey the law & render them defenseless while these animals are running around killing people (including armed LEOs) .... makes sense to me. /S
13 posted on
04/22/2013 12:57:38 PM PDT by
MissMagnolia
(You see, truth always resides wherever brave men still have ammunition. I pick truth. (John Ransom))
To: stevie_d_64
Did they have a license for the nails?
14 posted on
04/22/2013 12:58:24 PM PDT by
ForAmerica
(Texas Conservative Christian Black Man!)
To: stevie_d_64
'Bill S-7, the Combating Terrorism Act, includes provisions that make it an offence to leave the country to participate in acts of terror.
It also grants police the powers to pre-emptively arrest someone and hold them for three days without charge, and allows for imprisonment for up to 12 months for refusing to testify before a judge in an investigative hearing.'
Joy.
15 posted on
04/22/2013 12:59:18 PM PDT by
Theoria
To: All
I am never disappointed by the participants of this website!!!
Sometimes you really have to discuss the insanity of the insane, to remain sane...
16 posted on
04/22/2013 12:59:20 PM PDT by
stevie_d_64
(It's not the color of one's skin that offends people...it's how thin it is.)
To: stevie_d_64
“The news that the suspects were not authorized to own firearms will likely add fuel to calls for tougher gun laws an issue that was put on the back-burner last week after the Senate blocked the central elements of a gun-control package backed by President Obama.”
There was an earlier thread about this earlier. The above quote is really nonsensical.It actually proves 2nd amendment proponents right. But the dumbasses at Reuters can't even figure that out. When they do, this will disappear down the memory hole.
19 posted on
04/22/2013 1:01:04 PM PDT by
saleman
To: stevie_d_64
Clearly their guns were not illegal enough..
To: stevie_d_64
The news that the suspects were not authorized to own firearms will likely add fuel to calls for tougher gun laws That may be the stupidest statement I've heard in some time. "maybe we ought to pass more gun laws in case terrorists want to obey them."
21 posted on
04/22/2013 1:02:41 PM PDT by
Quickgun
(I got here kicking,screaming and covered in someone else's blood. I can go out that way if I have to)
To: stevie_d_64
If only they were required to have licenses.....
......oh wait.
Never mind.
24 posted on
04/22/2013 1:04:36 PM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(Leftists' favorite Mass Murderer: Kermit Gosnell)
To: stevie_d_64
Commence RAIDING ALL MOSQUES WITHIN REACH OF THOSE BOMBERS. They probably served as weapons depots for these punks. If our gov’t can raid every home in a neighborhood, THEY SURELY CAN RAID THE MOSQUES!
To: stevie_d_64
What weapons did they have? I know the generic “ two handguns and a rifle” but what were they? Were they recovered?
26 posted on
04/22/2013 1:04:42 PM PDT by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(Obama is the Chicken Little of politics)
To: stevie_d_64
The news that the suspects were not authorized to own firearms will likely add fuel to calls for tougher gun laws...Bwahahahahahaha!
These guys are nothing if not persistent.
28 posted on
04/22/2013 1:06:01 PM PDT by
papertyger
(Blessed are the flexible for they shall not be broken....)
To: stevie_d_64
Isn’t that the point? Criminals are going to have, and use, guns, REGARDLESS of existing gun laws.
30 posted on
04/22/2013 1:13:17 PM PDT by
FrankR
(They will become our ultimate masters the day we surrender the 2nd Amendment.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson