Skip to comments.Boston bombing: Muslims told not to apologize for their faith
Posted on 04/20/2013 10:54:49 AM PDT by jimbo123
In the wake of the Boston bombing, Muslims "find ourselves in that very awkward and uncomfortable place," said Mather Hathout, the senior advisor of the Muslim Public Affairs Council.
"Muslims, dont lose heart," he said. "We are really good people. We are really good Americans."
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
back to the old good muslim - bad muslim game.
And we need not apologize for killing Muslims in preemptive self-defense.
Non-muslims, don't lose head.
My heart bleeds for them.
Now deport and pogromize. Their friends too.
You’re a historian? Check out when Alex the Great lived.
Islam did not appear until the 7th century AD. The Macedonian was doing his thing long before Christ was born..
Story of Gordian Knot allegedly took place in what is now Turkey.
I think the great question to ask one of these “peaceful” Muslims is, “Do you believe in the Koran?” If the answer is yes they believe in killing infidels. It’s really that simple.
Prove it by turning in fellow muslim who are talking terrorism. Prove it by throwing Saudi Wahhabist prechers out of your mosques.
Methinks he doth protesteth too much!
There is a very simple test to see if someone is a good Muslim.
Ask them straight out to say that *particular* Muslims who committed a *particular* terrorist act are “bad Muslims”; and to condemn Muslim terror conducted against non-Muslims.
Those who are bad Muslims will lie to you by deceit. They will not condemn particular Muslims for a terrorist act, nor will they call it a terrorist act or call them bad Muslims. Then they will condemn “all acts of terrorism”, not specifically “Muslim acts of terrorism”.
The fall back position to these lies is that they the Muslim terrorists were insane, so were not responsible for their acts.
I have never, ever, heard a Muslim pass this test. And only if they do, they *might* be a good Muslim. Until they do, we have no choice but to assume the worst.
“Muslims, dont lose heart,” he said. “We are really good people. We are really good Americans.” And he forgot to say we really love the Jews and Christians.
Yeah right ... and I've got a rusty scimitar to sell you.
You have to admit the assertion was jarring. Could use some reworking.
Sounds like he hasn't read that Koran thingy.
Yup...in EVERY Muslim there is a dormant trait disorder called SJS (Sudden Jihad Syndrome)...
It comes to fruition when exposed to extremism...
When the Rosenbergs gave up the nuclear bomb secrets, America did not respond with a Krisallnacht against all Jews; Americans don’t do that. Nonetheless, when one picks up a snake, it’s wise to be sure it doesn’t have rattles on its tail.
So in a round about way, we have reached the same conclusion...there is no such thing as a good muslim!
If ever a religion needed a reformation—its Islam.
There, fixed it.
I know what progressive means. It means liberal left wing communist plain and simple.
The followers of Islam are bad - evil people. See Dr. Bill Warner at www.politicalislam.com. Educate yourself.
Shouldn’t they be asked if they believe in forgiveness as in turning the other cheek when offended? Shouldn’t we ask them if they believe in love(treat) your neighbor as you would yourself? I wonder what there answers would be? And would they know who taught this as values to follow?
Not really. What I have offered is an ‘acid test’. That I have never met a Muslim who passed it does not mean that there are not some who could.
Comparatively, during the HUAC investigations, looking for and finding communist infiltrators in the US government, there was a simple trick to find a fanatical communist.
It was to tell them a funny joke, to see if they were capable of “honest laughter”. This was because it was discovered that fanatics, including communist ones, have a very restrictive world view, defining everything in light of their fanatical beliefs. If they cannot fit it in, they discard it as useless information.
Typically, people use laughter as a psychological defensive technique when they observe or imagine the irrational. But this is a different technique than is used by fanatics.
It was not definitive, but it was a good indicator.
Many Muslims are “passive” Muslims, and while they can be organized into a mob, they are just followers, having no great initiative to act on their own. Without a fanatic to push them, their behavior is ordinary, and not particularly anti-non-Muslim.
Having no natural impulse to act makes them good candidates to embrace a reformed Islam, as it is just easier to do nothing than to be aggressive.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.