of whitewash delivered directly to the White House."
Posted on 04/20/2013 5:31:06 AM PDT by chessplayer
It feels like only yesterday when lefties were falling all over themselves to determine the motivations of those responsible for the Boston Marathon bombing.
Oh, wait. It was only yesterday. Strange, then, how the tides have turned. Since learning that the suspected bombers are Chechen Muslims and not white Tea Partyers (sorry, Michael Moore), suddenly the Left is no longer interested in focusing on motive:
David Sirota @davidsirota
Our reaction to terrorism shouldnt be predicated on the demography of the terrorists. Sad that bigotry apparently obscures this simple truth
There are none so blind, as she who will not see.
Someone should make a flow chart of how the LSM determines how they approach a story.
Yep. We saw it with the DC Sniper(s).
Flow chart is simple. If hurts liberalism eoj. Else loop.
OMG! Ijustthrewupinmymouthalittlebit!!!!!
This sums it up. Thanks.
The fact that the man who discovered terrorist #2 was only outside to smoke a disgusting cigarette is pretty sad for the liberal loons as well...
Democrat Muslim Terrorist
Bears repeating.
We now have a valid description of an enemy should America declare a Second Amendment Revolutionary War.
Too descriptive, too niche?
1. Climb tall tree. 2. Maneuver out on limb. 3. Saw off limb.
Don’t forget about the dude who mailed a ricin-laced letter to 0bama and others on Capital Hill.
watching the police presser last night before they caught the guy, some stupid reporterette actually asked the cop spokesman if they were concerned about vigilantes.
What amazes me is how they can be wrong about this again and again without being cautious next time.
They got kicked in the teeth by the truth twice this week and you just know they’ll immediately suspect conservatives next time.
Funny how the MSM is no longer speculating on why the terrorists bombed the Boston Marathon.
They just can’t seem to speak the words “For the Greater Glory of allah” that the infidels had to be killed.
We are going to learn that the muslims terrorists and terrorist mosque were well know to police but due to the current administration (both in Boston and Washington) were left alone.
That the muslim terrorists and all around them were big obama supporters.
That the failure to enforce CURRENT immigration law contributed to the bombings.
I wonder if the Republicans will use bombing victims as props as a rebuttal to an obama speech to achieve their political ends? Or would they have more class than that?
In a week, it'll be anti-immigrant bullying that pushed the younger brother into following along with the older brother's plan. A double victim, and obviously a sure sign that we need to address even more bullying and racist opinions in schools.
David Sirota @davidsirota
Our reaction to terrorism shouldnt be predicated on the demography of the terrorists. Sad that bigotry apparently obscures this simple truth
This from the guy who TWICE said he hoped the bombers were white.
My liberal friends are already putting up on their Facebook pages that we shouldn’t judge Muslims by the actions of two people. We must love everybody!
Prior to this terrorism the FBI under Obama would be putting the callers on a watch list for daring to call Muslims terrorists. But now that I think of it the FBI has I assume done exactly that now in this instance by keeping the list of those callers for future hate crime and Civil Rights violations prosecutions.
FBI: Help us ID Boston bomb suspects
By Matt Smith and Thom Patterson, CNN
updated 5:44 AM EDT, Fri April 19, 2013
Obama Bans Islam, Jihad From National Security Strategy Document
Published April 07, 2010
AP
AP Bans Word “Islamist”
April 5, 2013
By Sara Noble
free speech limitations
CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the unindicted co-conspriators in a terror finance trial (Holy Land Foundation) and a Hamas/Brotherhood front organization, has been lobbying the Associated Pravda to drop the term, “Islamist.”
The AP did it! They have discontinued use of the term “Islamist,” as “a synonym for Islamic fighters, militants, extremists or radicals.”
They banned “illegal immigrant” last week.
Once the press starts banning words, there will be no end. Are book burnings next?
Pretty soon, no one will know what anyone is talking about. There just won’t be the words, literally, to adequately describe a thing.
If PC isn’t an infringement on free speech, I don’t know what is.
http://www.independentsentinel.com/2013/04/ap-bans-word-islamist/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
