Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democratic governors push for Senate’s gun bill (Cuomo, O’Malley, Malloy)
Politico ^ | 4/17/13 1:49 PM EDT | KEVIN ROBILLARD

Posted on 04/17/2013 12:36:01 PM PDT by Red Steel

Three Democratic governors who successfully pushed their state legislatures to toughen gun laws are asking Congress to do the same.

“We need the federal government to take the lead and enact reasonable laws to reduce gun violence by, at a minimum, ensuring that more gun purchasers pass a federal background check,” Govs. Andrew Cuomo of New York, Martin O’Malley of Maryland and Dan Malloy of Connecticut wrote in a letter to Senators on Wednesday. “The American people are clear on this issue – more than 90% support background checks prior to gun purchases. They understand that if you can’t pass a background check, you should not be able to buy a gun. We stand with them, and urge you to do the same.” Continue Reading

The letter comes just hours before the Senate is expected to defeat a compromise to expand background checks crafted by Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Pat Toomey (R-Pa.). That compromise would cover online sales and sales at gun shows, but not private, person-to-person transfers. The governors’ letter says the compromise falls short of a goal for universal background checks, but is a “first step to address gun violence in our communities and honor the victims.”

(PHOTOS: Politicians speak out on gun control)

O’Malley, Cuomo and Malloy have all pushed their states to adopt tough new gun laws that go far beyond what the federal government is considering. Maryland’s law, for instance, includes a ban of 45 types of assault weapons and requires gun owners to hand over their fingerprints to get a gun license. The NRA has said it plans to challenge the law in court.

But all three governors said state laws alone can not protect Americans.

“Gun violence respects no borders, and our states’ laws alone are insufficient to systemically address gun violence on a national basis,” the trio wrote. “Without federal action, our citizens are only as safe as the state with the weakest gun laws.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut; US: Maryland; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; andrewcuomo; banglist; bloodoftyrants; cuomo; dannelmalloy; democrats; donttreadonme; govtabuse; guncontrol; liberalfascism; malloy; martinomalley; nocompromise; omalley; rkba; secondamendment; shallnotbeinfringed; treason; tyranny; waronliberty; youwillnotdisarmus

1 posted on 04/17/2013 12:36:01 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

RINO Christie will add his name to the list before long.


2 posted on 04/17/2013 12:37:15 PM PDT by Peter W. Kessler (Dirt is for racing... asphalt is for getting there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

I wonder if obama could pass a background test...


3 posted on 04/17/2013 12:38:01 PM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
"We need the federal government to take the lead and enact reasonable laws to reduce gun violence by, at a minimum,"

Sure, we do... tell me how this idiotic bill does any of that?

4 posted on 04/17/2013 12:38:13 PM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter W. Kessler

how true—why have people been getting all orgasmic over Christie? Don’t understand it.


5 posted on 04/17/2013 12:38:44 PM PDT by brooklyn dave (1st commandment THOU SHALT NOT BELIEVE THY GOVERNMENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Logic dictates that criminals will not submit to a background check. Either Democrats are hopelessly naive, or they have ulterior motives. My money’s on the later.


6 posted on 04/17/2013 12:40:10 PM PDT by eaglescout1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

And our Densa VP will be presiding in the Senate over the votes.


7 posted on 04/17/2013 12:41:18 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
O’Malley, Cuomo and Malloy

Three Baby Ruths floating in the punch bowl.

8 posted on 04/17/2013 12:41:21 PM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brooklyn dave
why have people been getting all orgasmic over Christie

Good question

Don’t understand it.

I don't understnd it either.

9 posted on 04/17/2013 12:42:39 PM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Awwwww Little Mario and Clownshoes O’Malley are starting to get worried that without federal cover, their new gun laws will destroy their presidential ambitions.

O’Malley is a raging moron who should have known this would happen. His predecessor, the clueless Parris Glendenning thought passing strict gun control would be a golden ticket into the Gore administration. And where is he now? He’s an angry, bitter lobbyist for a tiny little firm that lobbies for farmers. And now O’Malley sees the same thing is going to happen to him, poor little feller.


10 posted on 04/17/2013 12:49:10 PM PDT by Velvet_Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Anyone know what Republican governors are doing?


11 posted on 04/17/2013 12:54:52 PM PDT by Arm_Bears (Refuse; Resist; Rebel; Revolt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

"The prohibition is general. No clause in the Constitution could by any rule of construction be conceived to give to Congress a power to disarm the people. Such a flagitious attempt could only be made under some general pretense by a state legislature. But if in any blind pursuit of inordinate power, either should attempt it, this amendment may be appealed to as a restraint on both."
[William Rawle, A View of the Constitution 125-6 (2nd ed. 1829)

Donate To Free Republic

12 posted on 04/17/2013 1:19:24 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (My faith and politics cannot be separated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; Abundy; Albion Wilde; AlwaysFree; AnnaSASsyFR; bayliving; BFM; cindy-true-supporter; ...
FUMOM!

Maryland "Freak State" PING!

13 posted on 04/17/2013 7:12:09 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Drag Me From Hell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson