Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High court rejects challenge to NY gun law
AP ^

Posted on 04/15/2013 7:28:31 AM PDT by Perdogg

The Supreme Court is staying out of the gun debate for now.

The justices on Monday declined to hear a challenge to a strict New York law that makes it difficult for residents to get a license to carry a concealed handgun in public.

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol; judicailtyranny; scotus; secondamendment; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Sir Napsalot

This case went the the SCOTUS on an application for cert from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. I can only speculate, but I suspect the SCOTUS denied cert because of the changes in the New York law (the enactment of the “SAFE Act”) that occurred subsequent to the Second Circuit decision that is at issue.


41 posted on 04/15/2013 10:16:58 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I wish they would engage in even marginally decent (wishful thinking?) journalism and explain WHICH high court.


42 posted on 04/15/2013 11:34:06 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
(I may not be a lawyer, or play one on TV, but I did hear that on TV once or twice)

And, you stayed at a Holiday Inn?

43 posted on 04/15/2013 12:23:56 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
"It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices."

- Chief Justice John Roberts


44 posted on 04/15/2013 12:42:57 PM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
This kind of reporting is sloppy.

I find that to be the case in about 99.9% of reporting.

Pathtic.

45 posted on 04/15/2013 2:51:25 PM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Gee. We could start a FReeper legal arm and have some fun. :)


46 posted on 04/15/2013 5:30:08 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Liberalism. Ideas so great they have to be mandatory.-FReeper Osage Orange)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

The 2nd Amendment was under attack when the first law was passed requiring a license to carry.


47 posted on 04/15/2013 10:18:31 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

When some one is injured, we can only hope that the family of the injured seek redress upon the Legislature.


48 posted on 04/15/2013 11:29:50 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ( "It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

He will live to regret those words.


49 posted on 04/15/2013 11:32:11 PM PDT by Hoosier-Daddy ( "It is not our job to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson