Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The news here is not that somebody is urging the bombing of NK facilities, but NYT bothered to print it. Was it something they were drinking?
1 posted on 04/13/2013 2:25:10 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; nw_arizona_granny; ...

P!


2 posted on 04/13/2013 2:25:29 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (The way to crush the bourgeois is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
ZERO is being out maneuvered by a kid.
No surprise.
3 posted on 04/13/2013 2:36:59 AM PDT by DeaconRed (Call it what it is: Attempt at People Control: NOT GUN CONTROL. Gun control is holding it steady.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Yeah, let’s start yet another bombing campaign... with China sitting just to the north, what could go wrong?

As for why the NYT printed it, libs are all for going to war, sibling as there’s a rich political payoff for the little dictator, Colonel Barackamar Obamadaffi.


5 posted on 04/13/2013 2:52:15 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Gun control: Steady firm grip, target within sights, squeeze the trigger slowly...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I have the sick feeling that this whole thing is theater choreographed to make OUR dear leader look like a tough guy.

Work with the Norks to Make Kim Jong Un out to be a modern day Khrushchev, bluster your way through a contrived Cuban missile crisis of your own, maybe shoot down a missile, then send them a boatload of cash when they agree to peace.

Zero gets the Nobel Peace prize and KJU gets five billion dollars.


8 posted on 04/13/2013 3:45:56 AM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9 (Those that vote for a living outnumber those that work for one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

North Korea is China’s puppet to gather all its children under one roof and oboingo will do nothing because he’s in on it to


10 posted on 04/13/2013 4:01:11 AM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Uhh, doesn’t anyone realize China has a defense pact with NK? If we bomb NK China may launch an attack on the US.


12 posted on 04/13/2013 4:09:22 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Since it's in the slimes, it'll be interesting to see if the rest of the lame stream media goes along with it.

But even if they do, this admin won't do anything but golf.

b4its2late

15 posted on 04/13/2013 4:21:07 AM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

We’ve been there and done that.....it did not work out too well. Does anyone really believe Bam has the guts to nuke NK?


16 posted on 04/13/2013 4:26:11 AM PDT by kenmcg (scapegoat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Of course, everyone does understand that this whole thing is being used to take Iran of the Iran-NK axis out of the news?

The end game is not Un’s, but the Iranian Supreme Leader’s ploy for more time to get a nuke to use on Israel.


17 posted on 04/13/2013 4:27:07 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo
You beat me to this, Tiger! I was about to post the same article.

For the New York Times to print an op-ed piece calling for a first strike is shocking. And as for them being in Obama’s pocket, here's their editorial today on the subject: “North Korea poses a more imminent nuclear threat than Iran. But so far, Mr. Kerry’s continuing trip does not make us confident that the administration has a fully thought out strategy that will be any more successful than the current one, which has failed to curb either the North’s nuclear weapons program or its bellicosity.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/13/opinion/the-north-korea-problem.html?emc=tnt&tntemail1=y

Also, you might like to send this surprisingly positive profile of President Park Geun-hye to the Korea ping list:

Steely Leader of South Korea Is Battle-Ready

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/13/world/asia/park-geun-hye-steely-leader-of-south-korea-is-battle-ready.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20130413&pagewanted=all

The influence of the “old media” is less than it once was, but the New York Times is definitely an opinion leader in American liberal political circles. Something is clearly going on among the liberal elites if the New York Times is criticizing Obama, complimenting the daughter of a military dictator, and printing op-ed pieces calling for military first strikes. This simply isn't at all part of the normal playbook.

But then again, King Jong-un has also departed from the playbook, and perhaps those people in elite liberal circles who have access to information we don't have good reason to be afraid.

19 posted on 04/13/2013 4:58:06 AM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Bomb the North Korean missile site while making public statements that we are not seeking regime change and then hope they don't retaliate?

This guy is a flipping moron. I hope Barack Obama Valerie Jarrett isn't as stupid as he is.

20 posted on 04/13/2013 5:08:53 AM PDT by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

On his blog, Professor Suri admits he voted for Obama.
Does anyone think the NYT would give this kind of space to a (gasp) conservative?


21 posted on 04/13/2013 5:39:04 AM PDT by CivilWarguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Even though the left publicly present an anti-war face, deep down they LOVE the concept of all out world conflict.

A wide world war gives the left an excuse to command control the economy-—see FA Hayek.


23 posted on 04/13/2013 5:41:24 AM PDT by Le Chien Rouge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Common sense says, “Why would China ever want to call in their markers and demand payment on the US debt to them?”

Well, if Obama decides to start a Short, Disastrous War with NK, then China will have the excuse that they need to call in the debt. Is this the final part of the Obama/Soros plan to destroy the USA?


24 posted on 04/13/2013 5:51:46 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

If the leftist scumbags are whining about it, you know it’s a distraction.


25 posted on 04/13/2013 5:59:09 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
If North Korea can use its small nuclear arsenal to blackmail the region with impunity, why shouldn’t the mullahs in Tehran try to do the same?

As soon as the Mullahs get the bomb that's exactly what they'll do... well, 10 seconds after bombing Israel.

That said, North Korea's the armpit of the world. They should be laughed off the face of the earth... Bombing a country that has nothing and is nothing is a waste of time. Get with China and kill all members of the administration. The people there are slaves - there's no purpose to include them in the slaughter.

27 posted on 04/13/2013 6:38:27 AM PDT by GOPJ (New AP term for Illegal Aliens IS Undocumented Democrats.... Jay Leno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

28 posted on 04/13/2013 6:41:55 AM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Mater tua caligas exercitus gerit ;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Bomb North Korea, Before It’s Too Late

Too bad Truman didn't let MacArthur finish the job back in the fifties, then we would have to worry about the NORKS or the ChiComs.

30 posted on 04/13/2013 6:54:06 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (It's not "GUN CONTROL"! It's "PEOPLE CONTROL"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Actually the goal should be to take out the little fat man and his circle of ruling elite. It’s not like comfortable homes are difficult to spot in the midst of that sh*thole of a country.


33 posted on 04/13/2013 7:05:09 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
i say we just go for it, what are we waiting for? /
36 posted on 04/13/2013 7:10:43 AM PDT by Drawn7979
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson