Those two articles take Greenhouse Theory at face value and by the criterion set up in the theory itself finds no evidence of warming on the basis of greenhouse effect.
"Forbes reports on a peer-reviewed study that uses NASA data to show that the effects of carbon-based warming have been significantly exaggerated. In fact, much of the heat goes out into space rather than stay trapped in the atmosphere, an outcome that started long before AGW alarmists predicted:"
That article explains why no Hot Spot has been found.
Those five articles each show that Greenhouse Theory has no basis in reality due to a direct conflict with the known laws of physics. No wonder the smoking gun "hotspot" can't be found.
That article kills any thought of planetary warming from any cause. Think about it. If there is absolutely no sign of rising sea levels how could the planet be warming? The rise in sea level in the last 100 years is almost exactly the same as the average over the last 40,000 years caused by the inter-glacial period we are in.
What they’re saying is “weather causes climate change”? Okay.
I hope that these so called "Researchers" are not "Cafeteria Climatologists," cherry picking data to support their preconceived notions that climate change (a reality) is man-made.
Climate change is caused by the Sun.
There has been no comprehensive systems analysis of all the factors involved in climate change on the Earth, Venus, and Mars.
Man made climate change does NOT cause asteroids.
Calling weather extreme simply hypes the weather channel and the AWG tax collection efforts. It’s all in the marketing plan.
As Reagan would say: “There you go again”..And here we go again with them mentioning CO2 even though the percentage of CO2 is zero point zero (0.04%) which has about as much of an effect on global warming as an ant fart.