Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

That is now debatable. See Post #15

The big news was the settlement and the trigger for that was Crump’s filing the redacted settlement papers with the Court. Copies were said to have been delivered to the Defense and the Judge.

Next came the news that Nelson gave Crump 10 days to show why these settlement papers should remain confidential.

Now apparently they have been withdrawn. And the Defense said that they never got their copy.

So if a Crump files papers with the Court and then withdraws them, were they ever filed with the Court in the first place????


33 posted on 04/06/2013 2:03:01 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip
-- So if a Crump files papers with the Court and then withdraws them, were they ever filed with the Court in the first place? --

If the settlement was months ago, and the press knew it (refer to unspecified press interview with O'Mara, sometime in February), but the press didn't report the settlement when it learned about it - does that mean the settlement was reached in April? Or does it mean that the press is full of lying cockroaches?

The most recent entries on the Zimmerman criminal docket are:

04/05/2013   LETT   LETTER FROM THE CLERK'S OFFICE TO ATTORNEY BENJAMIN CRUMP REGARDING NOTICE OF 
04/05/2013   LETT   CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
I suspect the court has invited Crump to withdraw the filing.
36 posted on 04/06/2013 3:22:13 PM PDT by Cboldt (LETT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson