Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The ‘Vigilance’ Vigilantes - The tolerance enforcers will not tolerate dissent. (Mark Steyn)
National Review Online ^ | April 5, 2013 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 04/05/2013 11:03:11 PM PDT by neverdem

He who controls the language shapes the debate: In the same week the Associated Press announced that it would no longer describe illegal immigrants as “illegal immigrants,” the star columnist of the New York Times fretted that the Supreme Court seemed to have misplaced the style book on another fashionable minority. “I am worried,” wrote Maureen Dowd, “about how the justices can properly debate same-sex marriage when some don’t even seem to realize that most Americans use the word ‘gay’ now instead of ‘homosexual.’” She quoted her friend Max Mutchnick, creator of Will & Grace:

“Scalia uses the word ‘homosexual’ the way George Wallace used the word ‘Negro.’ There’s a tone to it. It’s humiliating and hurtful. I don’t think I’m being overly sensitive, merely vigilant.”

--snip--

Instead, the relentless propagandizing grows ever more heavy-handed: The tolerance enforcers will not tolerate dissent; the diversity celebrators demand a ruthless homogeneity. Much of the progressive agenda — on marriage, immigration, and much else — involves not winning the argument but ruling any debate out of bounds. Perhaps like Jeremy Irons you don’t have “strong feelings” on this or that, but, if you do, enjoy them while you can.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; maureendowd; maxmutchnick; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; pc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last
Freaking the Straights on Gay Marriage

It's not enough to defy nature and common sense. They'll go after free speech and traditional religions.

We need to start mocking all progressive nonsense.

1 posted on 04/05/2013 11:03:11 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JLS

Ping


2 posted on 04/05/2013 11:13:11 PM PDT by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"Happy" marriage?

Good Luck.

3 posted on 04/05/2013 11:19:13 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Been doing it for years, my friend.


4 posted on 04/05/2013 11:39:35 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

‘most Americans use the word ‘gay’ now instead of ‘homosexual.’’
Words have meanings; just because most people call it a dick does not change the fact that it’s a penis.


5 posted on 04/05/2013 11:48:06 PM PDT by Glenmore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
culture jamming
6 posted on 04/05/2013 11:49:17 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“The tolerance enforcers will not tolerate dissent; the diversity celebrators demand a ruthless homogeneity.”

Another gem by Mark Steyn.


7 posted on 04/05/2013 11:52:32 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glenmore

Calling Soetoro a “Christian” doesn’t change the fact that he’s a moslem.


8 posted on 04/05/2013 11:53:46 PM PDT by LyinLibs (If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

We need to start mocking all progressive nonsense.


I’ll continue to do so.

“Progressive = Repressive”

They hate that.


9 posted on 04/06/2013 12:02:39 AM PDT by laplata (The Answer To 1984 Is 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
We need to start mocking all progressive nonsense.

And somehow get the mocking to an audience much larger than Freerepublic.

10 posted on 04/06/2013 12:06:16 AM PDT by Ajnin (Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnocet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ajnin; neverdem

LOL - we do it for sport. Better than the smell of napalm in the morning.


11 posted on 04/06/2013 12:13:27 AM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: laplata

Confuse them with “transgressive”.


12 posted on 04/06/2013 12:15:24 AM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: laplata

Welcome to FR.


13 posted on 04/06/2013 12:15:54 AM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

I appreciate that, Gene Eric. Thanks.


14 posted on 04/06/2013 12:23:25 AM PDT by laplata (The Answer To 1984 Is 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ajnin
We need to start mocking all progressive nonsense. And somehow get the mocking to an audience much larger than Freerepublic.

They'll just demonstrate their noted high tolerance by dragging out their big brush and labeling us all "HATERS". That's how they "debate", schoolyard name calling, straw man arguments, and ad-homonym attacks.

Regards,
GtG

15 posted on 04/06/2013 12:26:04 AM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Confuse them with “transgressive”.


LOL! I’ll do that. Thanks.


16 posted on 04/06/2013 12:34:04 AM PDT by laplata (The Answer To 1984 Is 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
“Scalia uses the word ‘homosexual’ the way George Wallace used the word ‘Negro.’ There’s a tone to it. It’s humiliating and hurtful. I don’t think I’m being overly sensitive, merely vigilant.”

Would Ms. Dowd and Mr. Mutchnick prefer him to call them "sodomites" or "turd burglars"?

17 posted on 04/06/2013 12:34:53 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not really out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Would Maureen O’Dowd prefer they be called “Queer”?

In fact, the more militant homosexuals use the term “Queer”.... so O’Dowd should be OK with that.


18 posted on 04/06/2013 1:15:15 AM PDT by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

We’re PC - we believe in liberty for all Mankind (and we’re smug about it); you’d better be PC, too, so use that liberty we believe in to conform, or else you’ll be persecuted, ostracized, and shunned.


19 posted on 04/06/2013 1:53:44 AM PDT by Jack Hammer (American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator

To: Glenmore

I thought a “dick” was a detective?


21 posted on 04/06/2013 2:38:12 AM PDT by animal172
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This is a very important Steyn column. One of the most important battles going on in our society is that of language. Political Correctness is the enforcement arm. But the activists behind the scenes who decide what the rules are going to be - those are the most sinister people. As Steyn says, they want complete conformity. Free speech is their enemy. They are labeling some words as unacceptable, and changing the meaning of other words.

Our liberty is slipping away. We need to fight this. We need to enlist others to fight it.


22 posted on 04/06/2013 2:51:33 AM PDT by Rocky (Obama is pure evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

>>We need to start mocking all progressive nonsense.

This is why Dr. Raoul was such a treasure. It is why Breitbart was so effective.


23 posted on 04/06/2013 3:01:28 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Drive them crazy, ignore them.


24 posted on 04/06/2013 4:04:15 AM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky
They are labeling some words as unacceptable, and changing the meaning of other words.

............such as marriage and if left unchallenged will proclaim the tomato to be a vegetable!!!

25 posted on 04/06/2013 4:24:45 AM PDT by varon (USA Nationalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ajnin
...it makes me just want to beat the shit out of them. I want to give them real brutality so they know beyond a shadow of a doubt what hate really is but...

Hah! I'm similarly inclined. I'm too polite to commit crimes, but by all gods I disbelieve in, I've thought of a few crimes somebody could commit.

I content myself with the certainty the day will come when what's called "liberalism" today will be as socially, morally, and politically unacceptable as George Wallace's segregation. That may take awhile, or it may happen by this time next year, but it will happen.

26 posted on 04/06/2013 4:39:29 AM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“He who controls the language shapes the debate”

That is why the falsely labeled “Mainstream Media” should always be accurately described as “The Corrupt Liberal Media”

There is nothing “mainstream” about the open leftist bias and corruption of journalistic ethic in todays media.

If enough people started replacing mainstream media with The Corrupt Liberal Media, it would produce a google bomb that would put the CLM on notice that their corruption is widely noted.


27 posted on 04/06/2013 4:42:40 AM PDT by Uncle Lonny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Lonny

I’ll just start calling them faggots instead of homosexual then. Maybe fudge packers, turd burglars, etc...


28 posted on 04/06/2013 4:49:38 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Glenmore

I still use the words queers, and faggots.

I am sure one day that will become as politically incorrect and the N word. You see I can’t even use that word here without banishment .


29 posted on 04/06/2013 4:51:37 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
A freeper posted this yesterday and I think it needs re-posting here. It fits perfectly.

Newspeak language progress

Syme describing to Winston Smith the "progress" of the language in 1984, Chapter 5

'It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words. Of course the great wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hundreds of nouns that can be got rid of as well. It isn't only the synonyms; there are also the antonyms. After all, what justification is there for a word which is simply the opposite of some other word? A word contains its opposite in itself. Take "good", for instance. If you have a word like "good", what need is there for a word like "bad"? "Ungood" will do just as well -- better, because it's an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if you want a stronger version of "good", what sense is there in having a whole string of vague useless words like "excellent" and "splendid" and all the rest of them? "Plusgood" covers the meaning, or " doubleplusgood" if you want something stronger still. Of course we use those forms already. but in the final version of Newspeak there'll be nothing else. In the end the whole notion of goodness and badness will be covered by only six words -- in reality, only one word. Don't you see the beauty of that, Winston? It was B.B.'s idea originally, of course,' he added as an afterthought.

... 'You haven't a real appreciation of Newspeak, Winston,' he said almost sadly. 'Even when you write it you're still thinking in Oldspeak. I've read some of those pieces that you write in The Times occasionally. They're good enough, but they're translations. In your heart you'd prefer to stick to Oldspeak, with all its vagueness and its useless shades of meaning. You don't grasp the beauty of the destruction of words. Do you know that Newspeak is the only language in the world whose vocabulary gets smaller every year?'

... 'Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed, will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten. Already, in the Eleventh Edition, we're not far from that point. But the process will still be continuing long after you and I are dead. Every year fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little smaller. Even now, of course, there's no reason or excuse for committing thoughtcrime. It's merely a question of self-discipline, reality-control. But in the end there won't be any need even for that. The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect. Newspeak is Ingsoc and Ingsoc is Newspeak,' he added with a sort of mystical satisfaction.

30 posted on 04/06/2013 4:59:32 AM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ajnin
And somehow get the mocking to an audience much larger than Freerepublic.

We HAVE to get the COMMUNICATION channels back!

"Never quarrel with a man that buys ink by the barrel."

31 posted on 04/06/2013 5:50:13 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray
They'll just demonstrate their noted high tolerance by dragging out their big brush and labeling us all "HATERS". That's how they "debate", schoolyard name calling, straw man arguments, and ad-homonym attacks.

I've noticed that members of a certain religious group does this very thing here on FR when their history and teachings are revealed.

32 posted on 04/06/2013 5:51:55 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Venturer; jsanders2001

Ok; I’m with you fellas...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xJkUyotSc4


33 posted on 04/06/2013 5:55:12 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents
'It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.




 


'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone,
' it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more nor less.'

'The question is,' said Alice, 'whether you can make words mean so many different things.'

'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'  


34 posted on 04/06/2013 5:56:24 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents

 



 
Eerily familiar...
 
 

Party ownership of the print media
made it easy to manipulate public opinion,
and the film and radio carried the process further.


 



16. Ministry Of Truth

.......

The Ministry of Truth, Winston's place of work, contained, it was said, three thousand rooms above ground level, and corresponding ramifications below.

The Ministry of Truth concerned itself with Lies. Party ownership of the print media made it easy to manipulate public opinion, and the film and radio carried the process further.

The primary job of the Ministry of Truth was to supply the citizens of Oceania with newspapers, films, textbooks, telescreen programmes, plays, novels - with every conceivable kind of information, instruction, or entertainment, from a statue to a slogan, from a lyric poem to a biological treatise, and from a child's spelling-book to a Newspeak dictionary.

Winston worked in the RECORDS DEPARTMENT (a single branch of the Ministry of Truth) editing and writing for The Times. He dictated into a machine called a speakwrite. Winston would receive articles or news-items which for one reason or another it was thought necessary to alter, or, in Newspeak, rectify. If, for example, the Ministry of Plenty forecast a surplus, and in reality the result was grossly less, Winston's job was to change previous versions so the old version would agree with the new one. This process of continuous alteration was applied not only to newspapers, but to books, periodicals, pamphlets, posters, leaflets, films, sound-tracks, cartoons, photographs - to every kind of literature or documentation which might conceivably hold any political or ideological significance.

When his day's work started, Winston pulled the speakwrite towards him, blew the dust from its mouthpiece, and put on his spectacles. He dialed 'back numbers' on the telescreen and called for the appropriate issues of The Times, which slid out of the pneumatic tube after only a few minutes' delay. The messages he had received referred to articles or news-items which for one reason or another it was thought necessary to rectify.

In the walls of the cubicle there were three orifices. To the right of the speakwrite, a small pneumatic tube for written messages; to the left, a larger one for newspapers; and on the side wall, within easy reach of Winston's arm, a large oblong slit protected by a wire grating. This last was for the disposal of waste paper. Similar slits existed in thousands or tens of thousands throughout the building, not only in every room but at short intervals in every corridor. For some reason they were nicknamed memory holes. When one knew that any document was due for destruction, or even when one saw a scrap of waste paper lying about, it was an automatic action to lift the flap of the nearest memory hole and drop it in, whereupon it would be whirled away on a current of warm air to the enormous furnaces which were hidden somewhere in the recesses of the building.

As soon as Winston had dealt with each of the messages, he clipped his speakwritten corrections to the appropriate copy of The Times and pushed them into the pneumatic tube. Then, with a movement which was as nearly as possible unconscious, he crumpled up the original message and any notes that he himself had made, and dropped them into the memory hole to be devoured by the flames.

What happened in the unseen labyrinth to which the tubes led, he did not know in detail, but he did know in general terms. As soon as all the corrections which happened to be necessary in any particular number of The Times had been assembled and collated, that number would be reprinted, the original copy destroyed, and the corrected copy placed on the files in its stead.

In the cubicle next to him the little woman with sandy hair toiled day in day out, simply at tracking down and deleting from the Press the names of people who had been vaporized and were therefore considered never to have existed. And this hall, with its fifty workers or thereabouts, was only one-sub-section, a single cell, as it were, in the huge complexity of the Records Department. Beyond, above, below, were other swarms of workers engaged in an unimaginable multitude of jobs.

There were huge printing-shops and their sub editors, their typography experts, and their elaborately equipped studios for the faking of photographs. There was the tele-programmes section with its engineers, its producers and its teams of actors specially chosen for their skill in imitating voices; clerks whose job was simply to draw up lists of books and periodicals which were due for recall; vast repositories where the corrected documents were stored; and the hidden furnaces where the original copies were destroyed.

And somewhere or other, quite anonymous, there were the directing brains who co-ordinated the whole effort and laid down the lines of policy which made it necessary that this fragment of the past should be preserved, that one falsified, and the other rubbed out of existence.

 
 


35 posted on 04/06/2013 5:57:10 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

So THAT’s how WIKI works!


36 posted on 04/06/2013 5:58:28 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Personally I prefer the old fashioned word queer. It is accurately descriptive and not as harsh as deviant nor as pejorative as faggot.


37 posted on 04/06/2013 6:00:11 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents

Excellent reminder of the prescience of Orwell. Today’s logical descendants include Steyn for his ability to turn a phrase and Limbaugh for his drumbeat on “words have meaning”. Unfortunately, the low information masses cannot wrap their collectivist minds around how they are being manipulated as easily as The Shadow clouded men’s minds.


38 posted on 04/06/2013 7:08:01 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: laplata
Where are you in LaPlata? I'm in Ignacio.

FMCDH(BITS)

39 posted on 04/06/2013 7:29:34 AM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing.


40 posted on 04/06/2013 7:51:08 AM PDT by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Where Orwell advances, Jefferson retreats.

Controlling the language controls the discussion, which controls the thoughts, which control the person.

It appears freesh!t has become more preferable to many Americans than freed0m.

Today, if George Washington were around, he would be leading his army against his namesake city.

41 posted on 04/06/2013 8:20:37 AM PDT by Gritty (Our masters in Washington are afraid of a populace which cannot be subdued by tyrants-Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Affirmatively participating in someone else’s delusion will not cure their mental illness.


42 posted on 04/06/2013 9:25:31 AM PDT by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

If you believe in nothing you’ll fall for anything.


43 posted on 04/06/2013 9:31:35 AM PDT by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

*bump*


44 posted on 04/06/2013 9:42:14 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
the diversity celebrators demand a ruthless homogeneity.

Who would have imagined that such a scam was possible? And yet... here we are.

45 posted on 04/06/2013 9:46:44 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; All
'Political correctness' has raised the hair on the back of the neck since the beginning. During the desegregation period, they realized how much power they had control of, and thus ... never let it go. It is always on to the next thing.

People can and do take offense over many things, the words used, the look on our face, the tone of ones voice, what they imagine we are meaning, and in their mind it is usually to their detriment. NOT SO. It actually is a form of mental illness to imagine what others say is really demeaning to oneself. The best response is ... refuse to be offended, and continue on with the liberty and freedom given to each of us by God.

When we were kids we used to say "sticks and stones can break my bones but words can never hurt me". 'Political correctness' grew in power in the late 1960's and 1970’s. Quickly it took hold of what we could say and what was off the table. They did not tell us what the intent was. How is it we know it is mostly fraudulent and still we bend before the claim of 'political correctness'? Is it our Christian faith? While they lie cheat and steal, and blame their actions on others? It is past time to refuse to controlled by fake situations. MOO

46 posted on 04/06/2013 9:58:16 AM PDT by geologist ("If you love me, keep my commands" .... John 14 :15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nothingnew

Howdy neighbor. Durango.


47 posted on 04/06/2013 11:33:04 AM PDT by laplata (The Answer To 1984 Is 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty

Yes, the militants do use queer over gay and are very in your face. If you want a true laugh go to a “cis-gender” web forum and see the transgeder or “cis” gender attack the merely gay or queer. The Left, like the Muslims eventually attack each other.

Oh, and btw, only look into this if you have a taste for the absurd and a strong stomach.

An example of this insanity is Warren Beatty’s daughter/son/gay man born a woman. Oy.


48 posted on 04/06/2013 2:09:43 PM PDT by Pigsley (nan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This is why remaining on the offensive is more important than ever. Hit them back, hit them hard, and make it hurt.


49 posted on 04/06/2013 2:13:05 PM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Blather. Reince. Repeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty

There was a time when “queer” was the word everyone used. Then they changed it to “homosexual”. Now it’s “gay”. They scream “We’re here and we’re queer” but don’t you dare say “I see you, queer!”


50 posted on 04/06/2013 5:36:03 PM PDT by Terry Mross (This country will fail to exist in my lifetime. And I'm gettin' up there in age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson