Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Huckabee: We lost in 2012 because evangelicals didn’t support a more moderate nominee
Hotair ^ | 04/02/2013 | AllahPundit

Posted on 04/02/2013 6:51:34 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-162 next last
To: JCBreckenridge

So you know that Protestants already vote republican.

You know that Catholics already vote anti-republican.

You know that the democrats are importing millions of Catholic voters, and have been for years, what effect do you think that will have on the pro-life movement and our success in politics?


121 posted on 04/02/2013 1:18:29 PM PDT by ansel12 (The lefts most effective quote-I'm libertarian on social issues, but conservative on economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
There are few really sound pieces of evidence about anything left over from the 16th and 17th centuries. Treaties were usually produced in more than one language, copies made, and they were passed around. We actually have documents we can match up against each other.

The late 15th and early 16th were particularly difficult ~ Latin had a fixed spelling but maybe a dozen versions of Gallo were spoken in France and in the English court, and lord only knows what they spoke in Scotland in those days ~ or how they spelled it.

Normal fistfighting hard drinking gentlemen began letters to each other with "My dearest" and "My love" ~ with totally different meanings than you can imagine today.

122 posted on 04/02/2013 2:11:57 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

FWIW, both Santorum and Gingrich are Catholic; the best primary candidates we had at the time.


123 posted on 04/02/2013 2:15:58 PM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Indeed, and sleeping in group situations with other men was not at all uncommon - as with Lincoln - it implied nothing in terms of sex.

But with King James there are multiple independent lines of evidence that he was homosexual. They had the contemporaneous saying “Elizabeth was King, now James is Queen”, we have the numerous male “favorites” of the King, we have the (recently discovered) secret passage between his bedroom and his “favorite”, we have contemporaneous reports of him calling another man “wife” and he calling James “husband”, we have contemporaneous reports of them kissing in public (and not the kiss on the cheek that was common(and still is in some cultures)- but a noteworthy kiss), and we have records of the letters he wrote to his male lovers, and we have the fact that he was buried between two of his male lovers.

Against all that we have your condemnation of any historical record as spotty and circumspect; thus your decision to ignore any and all evidence that doesn’t fit what you wish to believe.


124 posted on 04/02/2013 2:19:10 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9781587292729

What can we know of the private lives of early British sovereigns? Through the unusually large number of letters that survive from King James VI of Scotland/James I of England (1566-1625), we can know a great deal. Using original letters, primarily from the British Library and the National Library of Scotland, David Bergeron creatively argues that James’ correspondence with certain men in his court constitutes a gospel of homoerotic desire. Bergeron grounds his provocative study on an examination of the tradition of letter writing during the Renaissance and draws a connection between homosexual desire and letter writing


125 posted on 04/02/2013 2:46:08 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Counterfeiting and forgery were far from uncommon in that period ~ hence the use of special seals, and even wax, to authenticate things.

Fires were common in public buildings anywhere documents by, about, pertaining to, or even rumored to be associated with ANY wealthy and/or powerful public person were located.

Sweden, famous for being among the first nations to adopt standard Civil Registration, and centralization of records suffered a disastrous loss of virtually all of its national history from the 1530s on when the “Tre Kronor” castle burned down in 1697. They are only now recovering ~ thanks to the Internet people are able to post all their personal materials.

As a result of that particular fire, NOTHING of consequence is truly known about the nieuwe Sverge colony ~ and it's been little more than a decade since a passenger list for the Kalmar Nikel (First shipload of settlers) was discovered! 5 Swedish Swedes and 95 families of Finn ~ at that time meaning Sa'ami or Lapplander. Fantastic news for folks trying to find the first Swedes in America ~ or maybe the second since a bunch of Swedes were hired on as surveyors by agents working for Filipe II/III back at the turn of the century ~ and a couple of them show up in the Jamestown Booke of the LIvinge and the Deade ~ with a date earlier than any of the other folks around them. That's as good as finding Snoori in your genealogy.

Between those few items the entire early history of Swedes in British America was only imagined. Now we know more. As the Swedes acquire their records, and put them on the net, we'll know more, and of course, one of the fellows we'll know more about is King James, Filipe's relative and childhood playmate. BTW, he grew up to be a fop himself. Fancy clothes, modern attitudes, and all the money in the world.

BTW, those burned Swedish records included plenty of material on King James I am sure.

126 posted on 04/02/2013 5:05:06 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Yeah I am just SURE that both the national library of Scotland and the library of England were fooled by fake letters! /s

Why not just admit you were wrong? King James was homosexual, he didn’t try to hide it, it was a matter of public record, and his letters were ultra gay. Almost as gay as your crackpottery.


127 posted on 04/02/2013 5:30:29 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Yeah, it's easy to believe the librarians are mistaken in their analysis of the content ~ because the written materials are old. The facts remain anticatholic propaganda was a fine art in the 1600s, as was antiprotestant propaganda, and the Brits and Spanish continued to splash mud on each other down to the present time.

As Babs Tuchman said,"“The fact of being reported multiplies the apparent extent of any deplorable development by five- to tenfold.” ― Barbara W. Tuchman, A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century "

Looking at the English and Spanish rivalry in the 16th and 17th century, and the total melt down on the Continent in the 17th century's 30 years war, all that propaganda continues to make more of an impression than the actual records ~ which were burned!

128 posted on 04/02/2013 6:11:04 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

The holy rollers are converting a good 25 to 30% of those new moveins within 5 years.


129 posted on 04/02/2013 6:12:27 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Why do you use a leftist anti-religious slur against them, it seems like you love to call people holy rollers.

Your statistics are wrong anyway.


130 posted on 04/02/2013 6:18:32 PM PDT by ansel12 (The lefts most effective quote-I'm libertarian on social issues, but conservative on economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

why are you so impertinent ~ i even have relatives who are holy rollers ~ bet you do too


131 posted on 04/02/2013 6:19:51 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Not only are your statistics wrong, but you do insist on using insulting name calling against them, and I am not aware of any family members of that persuasion.

You are just thoroughly wrong on your post, and I don’t know what your point was supposed to be except to insult religious people.


132 posted on 04/02/2013 6:25:23 PM PDT by ansel12 (The lefts most effective quote-I'm libertarian on social issues, but conservative on economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Then you aren't part of the discussion. I am. Your feigning of indignation over my use of a term we all regularly use to refer to their affiliation is disgusting.

It's like that white racist on MSNBC, Matthews, complaining about white people all the time.

133 posted on 04/02/2013 6:32:29 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Like I said, your numbers were way off anyway, your only purpose seemed to be to use a slur. Holy Roller Also found in: Acronyms, Wikipedia 0.01 sec. Holy Roller n. Offensive Used as a disparaging term for a member of any of various religious denominations in which spiritual fervor is expressed by shouts and violent body movements. Holy Roller n (Christian Religious Writings / Theology) Derogatory a member of a sect that expresses religious fervour in an ecstatic or frenzied way Ho′ly Roll′er n. usage: This term is a slur and should be avoided. It is perceived as insulting. —n. Slang: Offensive. (a contemptuous term used to refer to a member of a Pentecostal sect marked by the frenetic excitement expressed during services.)
134 posted on 04/02/2013 6:35:02 PM PDT by ansel12 (The lefts most effective quote-I'm libertarian on social issues, but conservative on economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I imagine it’s easy for a crackpot to believe anything they want no matter how much evidence they have to ignore.


135 posted on 04/02/2013 8:21:25 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I’m arguing that Protestants in general are less likely to vote Republican than White Catholics. If it’s about the faith and not the race, you would be honest and admit that the problem isn’t Catholicism.


136 posted on 04/02/2013 9:25:47 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

How does your obsession with racial purity within the Catholic church help conservatism, it is the Catholic vote that matters and that has only gone republican 5 times in history, and only once against an incumbent democrat, and while the whites who haven’t left the denomination yet have started voting a little more republican, it doesn’t change the Catholic vote.

“Protestant” includes all kinds of people and denominations, including the black vote and purely liberal denominations, yet the category has only voted democrat 3 times in our history, and 2 of those were 1932 and 1936, the category of “white Protestant” is very republican with numbers that blow away the “white Catholic” vote, “Evangelical” Protestants are extraordinarily pro-life and republican voters at 79%, America’s second largest denomination (Southern Baptist) in size to the Catholics, votes 80% and higher republican.

It does no good to see a recent shift among the whites of the Catholic denomination when we are importing Catholics by the millions from more pure Catholic nations than America has ever been, Catholics who have not been contaminated by growing up in a Protestant culture and with Protestant neighbors.


137 posted on 04/02/2013 11:32:47 PM PDT by ansel12 (The lefts most effective quote-I'm libertarian on social issues, but conservative on economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

last thing you ought to be doing is accepting Wikipedia as a SOURCE for what words mean for any purpose.


138 posted on 04/03/2013 4:43:34 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Everyone knows that “holy roller” is an insult, you know it as well and it is why you use it so frequently.

It doesn’t help that your post was all wrong factually anyway, you just wanted/want to make the anti-religious insult it seems.


139 posted on 04/03/2013 10:14:50 AM PDT by ansel12 (The lefts most effective quote-I'm libertarian on social issues, but conservative on economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

It’s merely a demonstration that your screed that “Catholics are responsible for electing Obama” is false.

Even if you were to remove Catholics from the electorate altogether, Obama would still win.

The same is not true of the reverse. The last time the Republicans won, they won the Catholic vote. It’s becoming very apparent to me that if the Republicans are going to win, they have to win the Catholic vote.

So go on, alienate Catholics.


140 posted on 04/03/2013 10:19:25 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson