Posted on 03/28/2013 5:02:43 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
When the Pentagon said earlier this year that it would open ground combat jobs to women, it was cast in terms of giving women equal opportunities in the workplace — the military workplace.
But the move has practical considerations, too. The military needs qualified people to fill its ranks, and it's increasingly harder to find them among men.
"It's fairly common knowledge that our population of military-age young men, who qualify for the military, is declining," Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey said in an interview with NPR just after the Pentagon announced that women no longer be excluded from ground combat jobs.
Too many potential male recruits have criminal records, drop out of high school or have drug problems. In addition, the rising obesity rate is also a factor.
Expanding The Candidate Pool
Dempsey and the joint chiefs looked out to the end of the decade and decided they had to recruit more women.
"As a very practical matter, we decided if in 2020 we're going to need these young ladies, and we're going to need to attract as much diversity and as much talent as we can possibly attract, if that's going to be the case, what are we waiting for?" he said
It's a serious concern. Less than 25 percent of young people — both male and female — can actually meet the standards for military enlistment today. Those standards disqualify more men than women. Young men account for three-fourths of all arrests, and in all 50 states, males have a higher high school dropout rate than females.
"Recruiters anecdotally will have fewer issues with a female applicant than they will with a male," says Kathleen Welker, who is with the U.S. Army Recruiting Command at Fort Knox, Ky.
Opening more combat jobs to women will help the Army meet its goals, she says.
"It expands the pool of candidates who are eligible to enlist across the board," she says.
Setting Standards
But will women want to sign up for those new jobs in the infantry, armor and artillery units?
Bernard Rostker, a former undersecretary of defense for personnel, says he's doubtful many young women will choose those careers.
"We're not prepared to force women into combat positions. It's a very nontraditional role," he says. "The numbers would likely be quite small.
And then there's the question of whether women who apply can meet the tough physical standards for ground combat. Dempsey and other military leaders will soon review the training program. He said some existing standards — which include everything from pull-ups to carrying heavy loads — need to be revised.
"There are existing standards, many of which haven't been dusted off in a very long time, many of which have been narrowly focused just on physical standards but without the companion piece of psychological and intellectual standards," Dempsey said.
Statements like that are leading some military officers to complain privately that combat training will be watered down to allow more women to pass.
Meanwhile, some women already are trying to meet the existing physical standards. Last fall, two female Marines were the first to try and complete the grueling, 12-week-long Infantry Officer Course. They failed, along with about 20 percent of the men.
Later this month, two more female Marines will see if they can make it.
The “Qualifications” don’t matter when you impose BS Rules of Engagement, and corrupt the mission, by asking our troops to change the local culture.
It’s fairly common knowledge that our population of military-age young men, who qualify for the military, is declining,”
...........................................................
Bullsh*t
There are plenty who qualify, just not too many willing to sign up to spend year after year being sent back into a combat zone.Not too willing to be prosecuted for doing their duty as they see it. Not too many willing to go back to foreign shitholes 3 or 4 times .Not too many willing to serve alongside openly homosexual soldiers.Not too many willing to have their legs and arms blown off while they cannot see the enemy that is killing and wounding them.Not too many willing to train the people that turn on them and kill them. Not too many who are willing to fight a political limited war where there is no win.
“Too many potential male recruits have criminal records, drop out of high school or have drug problems. In addition, the rising obesity rate is also a factor.”
They’re also sick of a country that hates them and the constitution. Why would they want to lose limbs overseas to have Obama take credit for any victory, for them to be blamed by future children for terrorist attacks, as per their education videos?
Translation;
The base for the Armed forces has been long been conservative males, and now that homosexuals serve openly in the ranks, that base no longer finds the PC military as attractive. So now the PC military must scour the bottom of the barrel to make up for the losses.
“Too many potential male recruits have criminal records, drop out of high school or have drug problems. In addition, the rising obesity rate is also a factor.”
They’re also sick of a country that hates them and the constitution. Why would they want to lose limbs overseas to have Obama take credit for any victory, for them to be blamed by future children for terrorist attacks, as per their education videos?
They’re setting the Sheeple up for reinstatement of the “Draft”.
I don’t recommend today’s military to anyone. The ramifications of the repeal of DADT and the muzzling of Christian chaplains on the subject portend bad things for the future.
My concerns lie with the rules of engagement, they put our soldiers at greater risk.
I'm more disappointed in our military leadership than I am the CinC, but not by much.
Well, they wanted this... once they sign up, put 'em there, anyway.
You want some good men???
Raise the immigration quotas for Serbians, Copts, Sikhs and other anti-Muslim males. They know how to fight and make good soldiers.
Women are NOT fighters and killers - with a few glaring exceptions.
. . . maybe it's because they'll have to live in barracks with homosexuals
. . . or maybe they'll have to learn to look out for the women in their foxholes before they can look out for themselves
. . . or maybe because their so-called Commander in Chief is an illegal alien, horribly anti-American fraud?
. . . or maybe because they'll be court-marshaled if they don't fire on and kill their fellow civilian citizens?
My God . . . have we all gone to hell?
“My God . . . have we all gone to hell?”
Unfortunately, you and I know the answer.
This is so ignorant.
Name another country that is putting women in front line combat positions. And Isreal doesn’t count. We are not surrounded by insane muslims determined to eliminate us.
We are ruled by one though.
Exactly my response!!! WELL said Sir!!
What to do? Put all the women into ready reaction forces and have a rotation schedule so that they’re all on PMS at the time. Put gays in their own units and let them paint their gear whatever color they want so they’ll be happy. Hold the “straights” in reserve so that the girls and poofters can have a chance to prove themselves under combat conditions. You folks wanted recognition? You’ve got it. Now, LEAD from the front!
i am a very proud US Infantry vet (11c1p) who served under Reagan and there is no way in h#ll i would let my son join the ranks of today. military leadership is all political appointees and words cannot fully vent the disdain i have for the so called CIC. i will not sacrifice my son in the name of the madness that is 21st century America.
USN Vet here and I agree with you.
I would do nothing to encourage ANY of my grandchildren to join today’s Military.
Once they turn 18, that may be their choice but they certainly would not get my backing, though I would support them personally....(where have we heard that before)? <: <:
Yup, the phrase “rear echelon” takes on a whole new meaning.
No longer is it, “In the rear with the gear”. It is now, “In the rear with the queers”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.