Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CDC: 110,197,000 Venereal Infections in U.S. [title shortened to fit]
CNS News via The Drudge Report / drudgereport.com ^ | March 27, 2013 | By Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on 03/27/2013 6:16:55 PM PDT by thecodont

(CNSNews.com) - According to new data released by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there were 19.7 million new venereal infections in the United States in 2008, bringing the total number of existing sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the U.S. at that time to 110,197,000.

The 19.7 million new STIs in 2008 vastly outpaced the new jobs and college graduates created in the United States that year or any other year on record, according to government data. The competition was not close.

The STI study referenced by the CDC estimated that 50 percent of the new infections in 2008 occurred among people in the 15-to-24 age bracket. In fact, of the 19,738,800 total new STIs in the United States in 2008, 9,782,650 were among Americans in the 15-to-24 age bracket.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clintonlegacy; disease; education; stds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: The_Reader_David
Pretty much everyone who’s ever committed fornication, and even a lot of folks who saved themselves for marriage and have been faithful ever since have HPV.

The people in the second group have this little health problem because they married someone from the first group.

41 posted on 03/29/2013 7:53:16 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Oklahoma

I thought the same thing at first, but look closer - these are infections - people can have multiple types of STDs, and likely do. I want to know how many PEOPLE have STDs by age and race/ethnicity. I read somewhere that the old Boomers are getting STDs, too, at alarming rates. Not pretty - and condoms don’t help for a lot of this because the fluids can still penetrate through along with the disease and pestilence.


42 posted on 03/30/2013 8:01:07 AM PDT by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConjunctionJunction; detective

Washington DC has a very large homosexual population, which would explain its higher rate of STDs, plus all those grotesque switch-hitter politcians running our country into the ground.


43 posted on 03/30/2013 8:03:26 AM PDT by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

With high probability, yes, though if the virginal sister in the documented case of transmission by clothing-sharing saves herself for marriage, she and her husband (if he, too lived up to the Christian ideal of chastity) would be counter-examples.


44 posted on 03/30/2013 2:44:15 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

You are a little behind the times. On free republic I learned an amazing factoid about cervical cancer of the throat! Turns out the throat can store HPV and get cancer.

It is a lesbian disease and has nothing to do with fornication.

There was also a post describing the use of saran wrap to prevent transmission. I can’t remember what the procedure was called.


45 posted on 03/30/2013 3:03:24 PM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....The fairest Deduction to be reduced is the Standard Deduction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Sioux-san

I’m not a doctor or a medical researcher so I have to depend on common sense and what I can find online. When you search questions like “how many Americans have STDs each year?” or “how many Americans have multiple STD infections each year?” you will get a range of data which probably gives a fairly accurate view of what is happening.

At any given time a certain percentage of the populations has HAD a venereal disease and that percentage varies within a range over the years. That range of rates is certain to be higher than the currently active infections at that same given time.

I would be interested in finding out how those “currently” infected and “at one time” infected rates have changed over the years. This isn’t a new problem and it probably isn’t a solvable problem which leads me to believe not much has changed.


46 posted on 03/30/2013 8:30:38 PM PDT by Oklahoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson