Well man causes global warming. /s
1 posted on
03/26/2013 6:32:28 PM PDT by
SMGFan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: thackney
2 posted on
03/26/2013 6:34:29 PM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: SMGFan
Probably?
Gonna need more evidence than “maybe”.
3 posted on
03/26/2013 6:34:32 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: SMGFan
"...and federal scientists concluded."Well then, it's GOTTA be true!
4 posted on
03/26/2013 6:34:46 PM PDT by
Slump Tester
(What if I'm pregnant Teddy? Errr-ahh -Calm down Mary Jo, we'll cross that bridge when we come to it)
To: SMGFan
When you set out to prove a man-made cause you can skew the data to prove your theory....and they did.
5 posted on
03/26/2013 6:36:34 PM PDT by
Autonomous User
(The Obama Doctrine: Blame America First.)
To: SMGFan
probably , maybe....
lolz
6 posted on
03/26/2013 6:36:46 PM PDT by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
To: SMGFan
Scientists may have “concluded”, but that conclusion wasn’t reached scientifically.
It was a premeditated, agenda driven “conclusion”.
7 posted on
03/26/2013 6:38:21 PM PDT by
G Larry
(Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
To: SMGFan
yeah, right...
8 posted on
03/26/2013 6:40:17 PM PDT by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: SMGFan
I experienced that earthquake. At the time, the experts said it was not caused by fracking. There is a fault line called the Wilzetta fault near Prague.
To: SMGFan
“In a statement, the Oklahoma Geological Survey said the interpretation that best fits the data is the quake “was the result of natural causes” but needs further study. The state officials cited new 3-D seismic data, a time lag between injection and the quakes , and the orientation of the faults to say it was natural not induced.”
To: SMGFan
As the good Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf would say, “bovine scatology.”
11 posted on
03/26/2013 6:44:54 PM PDT by
jazusamo
("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
To: SMGFan
Haven’t you heard? ALL DRILLING IS FRACKING AND WE”RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!!!
Here is a story out of Ann Arbor about the exploration of leases in that county and the liberals are already screeching about fracking with the writer of the story urging them on in the comments. The reality is that Fracking generally isn’t needed for the shallow michigan wells.
http://www.annarbor.com/news/company-exploring-oil-leases-in-northfield-township/
12 posted on
03/26/2013 6:49:56 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: SMGFan
This technology, in OK definitely, is 60 years old. This has got to be the most wild ass stack of execrable, shameless posturing I’ve read this week.
13 posted on
03/26/2013 6:53:18 PM PDT by
Prospero
(Si Deus trucido mihi, ego etiam fides Deus.)
To: SMGFan
If they think a 5.6M is big, wait until the enviro-nuts start “sequestering” CO2 by the bcf deep underground...
14 posted on
03/26/2013 6:54:39 PM PDT by
DTogo
(High time to bring back The Sons of Liberty !!)
To: SMGFan
The DC quake last year’s seismograph was very weird too, almost like a underground nuke.
15 posted on
03/26/2013 7:00:04 PM PDT by
struggle
(http://killthegovernment.wordpress.com/)
To: SMGFan
Sure, Ya gotta believe the govt scientists and university profs? I wouldnt be inclined to believe these dorks If they tried to convince me that yesterday was, well, yesterday.
16 posted on
03/26/2013 7:05:40 PM PDT by
Afterguard
(Liberals will let you do anything you want, as long as it's mandatory.)
To: SMGFan
Lordy I am sick of the post hoc ergo proper hoc arguments that keep creeping into so called scientific reports
17 posted on
03/26/2013 7:07:02 PM PDT by
Nifster
To: SMGFan
The reason it was so big is because they didn’t pump the waste down sooner.
To: SMGFan
University and federal scientists? No agenda there. /sarc
21 posted on
03/26/2013 7:32:40 PM PDT by
skr
(May God confound the enemy)
To: SMGFan
I’ll be definitely maybeed.
22 posted on
03/26/2013 7:32:55 PM PDT by
rwilson99
(Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
To: SMGFan
Was Christopher Walken involver?
23 posted on
03/26/2013 7:34:00 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, you've likely misread the situation.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson