Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SkyPilot
She works, and for a Constitutional, worthy agency (Dept of Defense).

The Dept of Defense is not necessarily a Constitutional agency -- in fact, it could be easily argued that it is not: the Constitution only allows for the Army and Navy (Marines are a sub-department of the Navy), which means that the Air Force is extra-constitutional. Thus the DoD cannot be said to be wholly constitutional.

It could be argued that the Department of Transportation is more Constitutional: this is because the Congress is supposed to make commerce between the States regular, which is much of what the DOT does (though it could be pruned very much, but that is like most government agencies in general); the Post Office is another agency, being explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, which is more Constitutional than the DoD.

44 posted on 03/20/2013 8:16:20 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark
It could be argued that the Department of Transportation is more Constitutional: this is because the Congress is supposed to make commerce between the States regular

I think that is a bit of a stretch.

The founders clearly intended for the nation's common Defense - so much so that it is in the preamble.

The argument you advanced regarding commerce has been utilized by every tyrant-wannabe, Socialist, and Communist in US Congressional history as an excuse to impinge on American freedoms, from everything from gun ownership to health care.

45 posted on 03/20/2013 10:57:04 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson