[Nachum]

Full title: NJ Rep. Leonard Lance: Janet Napolitano Must Explain Bullet Stockpile and Armored Vehicle Purchases (Video)

Vid at link

[Nachum]

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/

[Izzy Dunne]

MUST do it?

or else..... WHAT?

[laweeks]

Well, I sure as hell SOMEONE will ask why they need all this ammo and weapons. And shouldn’t congress have asked them many months ago????????????????????????????????????

[DLfromthedesert]

Bet it’s not to fight at the border.

[Steely Tom]

They are necessary. They are needed to ensure national security. Now shut up.

[SWAMPSNIPER]

[Jane Long]

I see a beer summit in poor Rep Lance’s future.

[laweeks]

As far as I’m concerned, the sock-puppet Obambi’s handlers have something horrible planned for middle Americans in a year or so. Something very terrible.

We shouldn’t be surprised at what these thugs will do (or try to do). Obambi’s to stupid on his own to do anything, so his handlers have probably conjured up something to get America in line with their dictatorship. Heaven help us!

[SpaceBar]

1.6 billion bullets and 2700 armored vehicles

My intuition says we're not planning to invade Poland

[mountainlion]

What is next, Atomic weapons?

[skeeter]

Someone here was saying it was silly to be concerned, and that there was a perfectly reasonable justification for these purchases.

Well, are these 2700 APC's for the Marines or are they for the DHS? And is it normal for domestic agencies to buy 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition periodically or not?

[Blood of Tyrants]

All the better to oppress the peasants, my dear.

[Vince Ferrer]

Good point:

Note that these are described as “personal defense weapons”, while less lethal weapons in the hands of US citizens are described as “assault rifles”.

[Jim Robinson]

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

If government civil service agencies are going to stock up on "military" grade weapons for possible use against the people of the free state, then it only makes sense that the people of said free state (ie, the militia) exercise their 2nd amendment rights to stock up on same to defend themselves from the very real possibility of government overstepping its constitutional bounds, ie, tyranny and oppression.

[Mr. K]

Jus to THE COST ALONE I would like to explain that gian expenditure!!!

And why?

some of that ammo is retailing for a over a buck a shot- thats close to $2BILLION dollars for ammo and armored vehicles.

Who allocated that much budget for that?

And again, WHY??????????

[Presbyterian Reporter]

Does anyone but the military have to take this oath?

“I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

If non military employees do not have to take an oath defending the Constitution, then it is obvious why Napalitano is buying armored vehicles and billions of rounds of ammunition. Her minions are not required to defend the 2nd Amendment.

[45semi]

LETS NOT FORGET THE 7K 'PDW'S

[Travis McGee]

[jwalsh07]

Cyprus.

[manc]

thought we had no money.