Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 03/19/2013 3:52:17 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:

No link and duplicate:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2997817/posts



Skip to comments.

LIES OUR GOVERNMENT TELLS US: Government Spending Soars After Sequester
BIZ PAC Review (West Palm Beach, Florida) | March 18, 2013 | Jonathon Moseley

Posted on 03/18/2013 8:23:51 AM PDT by Moseley

Will you and your family be harmed by 10% cuts in government spending known as the “sequester?” Or have politicians been caught lying to us, going way too far this time?

The U.S. Government spent $1.78 trillion dollars in Fiscal Year 2000. It will spend $3.42 trillion in Fiscal Year 2013 – even after the 10% sequester. That’s an increase of $1.63 trillion – repeating each year – more than the U.S. Government spent in 2000. That’s 91% more spending every year.

In Fiscal Year 2000 – at half the spending -- airplanes were flying, meat and food were being inspected for safety, children were getting White House tours, national parks were open, firemen were putting out fires, school teachers were in the classroom, young kids were in Head Start, and airport security was moving passengers to their gate.

So why can’t government afford these services at $3.42 trillion per year when it could afford them at $1.78 trillion per year? The truth is buried within data published by the Office of Management and Budget posted at www.WhiteHouse.Gov in “Table 4.1—Outlays by Agency: 1962–2017.”

Spending under Barack Obama has exploded. But Federal spending had already exploded under George Bush. Conservatives rebelled against big spending in the 2006 elections, causing Republicans to lose control of Congress. Karl Rove’s strategies to “buy” a permanent majority with big spending may have created a permanent majority for Democrats.

To understand if government now has “enough” to cover basic services, we should consider increases under Bush. Yes, we fought two wars. So let’s examine only non-defense Departments, ignoring the Social Security Administration.

Spending in FY 2013 will be larger than in FY 2000 as follows. Remember: This is repeating each and every year.

• $1.5 billion every year (53% increase) for Congress
• $12.6 billion every year (105% increase) for international assistance programs
• $47 billion every year (113% increase) for the Dept. of Transportation
• $31.2 billion every year (93% increase) for the Dept. of Education
• $34.5 billion every year (71% increase) at the Office of Personnel Management
• $2.8 billion every year (71% increase) for the Judicial Branch
• $139 billion every year (85% increase) for the Dept. of Agriculture
• $59.6 billion every year (187% increase) for the U.S Department of Labor
• $464 billion every year (121% increase) for the Dept. of Energy
• $16 billion every year (95% increase) for the U.S Department of Justice
• $10.8 billion every year (35% increase) for the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development
• $22 billion every year (329% increase) for the Dept. of State
• $4 billion every year (50% increase) for the Dept. of the Interior
• $98.4 billion every year (25% increase) for the Dept. of the Treasury
• $819 million every year (11% increase) for the Environmental Protection Agency
• $2.6 billion every year (19% increase) for N.A.S.A.
• $3.3 billion every year (95% increase) for the National Science Foundation


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2014election; 2016election; budget; debt; election2014; election2016; sequester; spending

1 posted on 03/18/2013 8:23:51 AM PDT by Moseley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Moseley

And, if you don’t like it, the govt will protect this spending increase with its expenditures on billions of hollow points, thousands of MRAPs and thousands of AR-15s.


2 posted on 03/18/2013 8:29:04 AM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N

Why isn’t the budget for Homeland Insecurity mentioned?


3 posted on 03/18/2013 8:32:03 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

Oh by the way, this ignores the fact that the Department of Homeland Security was created by carving out many major units from other Departments. So the overspending is even worse if you remember that those Departments were relieved of many major responsibilities transferred to Homeland Security.


4 posted on 03/18/2013 8:34:37 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.curesocialism.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley
Spending in FY 2013 will be larger than in FY 2000 as follows. Remember: This is repeating each and every year.

They put thousands of illegal criminals out on our streets to punish us for our disobedience.

They want our money, but by golly don't you even suggest taking away their fine wines, caviar, Delmonico steaks, and luxurious vacations!!

BTW, where are the Oboma girls going for spring break this year? Aruba? Bahamas? Last year the teens enjoyed a relaxing million dollar get away in Mexico.
(It's good to live off other peoples money.)

5 posted on 03/18/2013 8:35:46 AM PDT by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

I didn’t include Homeland Security because it was newly created so it doesn’t offer a good picture of the massive increases in overall spending.


6 posted on 03/18/2013 8:35:46 AM PDT by Moseley (http://www.curesocialism.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

Buy a permanent majority = Massive debt

But who’s counting anyway.They just pass the debt on to us.


7 posted on 03/18/2013 8:35:49 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

they lost departments but didn’t lose the money that budgeted these departments ? I’m shocked !

Like the Dept. of Ed allowing an opt-out of no child left behind, but they still get to keep the NCLB money...


8 posted on 03/18/2013 8:44:48 AM PDT by stylin19a (obama - Fredo smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

I just assume that everything the gov tells us is a lie.


9 posted on 03/18/2013 8:58:13 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Ruling elite = modern day monarchy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

10% cut in spending....?... LoL..IN YOUR DREAMS....

Whoever quotes that figure is lieing to you...
Put their hand in your pocket and are looking for something “WARM” to touch.....
While looking for your wallet..


10 posted on 03/18/2013 11:02:42 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson