Posted on 03/17/2013 6:56:40 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
Jury duty is something we all are asked to serve at one time or another in our lives. In a just society, where the enforcement of law is critical to maintaining civility and order, jury duty is an honor. In an unjust society, where the enforcement of law is simply a charade, jury duty reduces those who are called upon to nothing more than actors and actresses helping to maintain the fraudulent facade of authenticity being put forth by the state.
In my opinion, since it is evident that the Federal laws having to do with the eligibility of the President are currently being ignored by those assigned to enforce them, that there is no law at the top, thus, there can be no law at the bottom.
If the person who supposedly is the chief law enforcement officer in the nation is illegal, how on earth can the rest of any of it be made to seem "legal"? If I were asked to be a juror on a Federal case, I would refuse to render a verdict until the Federal government can prove to me BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT that the current person claiming to be my President is in fact legally eligible to serve. I would have them quote the evidence that was used to determine his eligibily as required under the Constitution in the Twentieth Amendment, Section 3.
If I were a defense attorney in a Federal case, I would force the Federal government to prove to my jury beyond that same reasonable doubt that it is enforcing the laws at the top and not just the laws at the bottom.
If there is no law at the top of the current Federal government, the current Federal government is outlaw and should be dealt with by the Armed Services, County Sheriffs, and the states.
We the People own this country and we are not actors from Hollywood. We need a few of us to start acting like the citizens we are.
That has always been a citizen's ultimate weapon. If you want to get out of jury duty just say the magic words.
The law of unintended consequences.
If the elected criminals plan to eliminate the first, the second and.. well, the entire Bill of Rights, They will also have to eliminate trial by jury. Haven't we been there before? The Magna Carta as I recall.
Political devolution has been the death of tyrants throughout history.
Quite the smug little toad, are you not? Delusional, too.
That's not the way the system works? The system has been perverted the same way the family has been perverted.
Believe me, when jury nullification finally vaccinates the system, you'll never see it coming!
A silly comparison.
A prospective Juror need not challenge the judge or the court, nor can he be forced to. He just is obligated to vote his conscience after he has heard all the evidence.
Now, if everybody did it...If 500,000 people showed up in Albany, Denver, DC with standard capacity(30 rd) mags and evil black rifles.
The tyrants answer is always secret trials or military tribunals.
If I was ever on Trial, I would have my Lawyer ask the Judge to verify the Citizenship of every Juror sitting in that Jury Box.
Since I have no plans of actually being put on Trial, unless it’s because I won’t comply with any of the new fashionable Obama Lover Gun Control Laws, I am waiting for the day that someone actually challenges the Courts to enforce the Constitutional Requirement of Juries consisting of your Peers, fellow Citizens, not Illegal Invaders.
With the biggest Vote Fraud scheme of the modern era, the Motor Voter Law signed by the Rapist and Cigar abusing Bill Clinton, the chances of being Judged by a Jury of fellow Citizens is seriously in doubt.
Heathen.
And damn proud of it.
Indeed. My kin by clan, also. All the best
All the best to you too my Friend.
Free Republic, all for one and one for all. Wolverines!
Hitting the hay, goodnight...
Obviously, your not a "Lawyer / Attorney," and Obviously never sat on a jury (I have {sat on a jury} & did try some "Idiotic grandstanding") a.k.a., Jury Nullification.
To say the judge was shall we say very, very, upset, Yes he was. The only judgment that was handed out to me was I was removed from the jury, PERIOD.
To state that you have ZERO IDEA, of a juror's rights, privileges, and IMMUNITIES WOULD BE AN understatement.
“To say the judge was shall we say very, very, upset, Yes he was. The only judgment that was handed out to me was I was removed from the jury, PERIOD.”.
And I’ll bet it didn’t take long to achieve either. DO NOT SCREW with the Court System or the Judge. You will loose EVERY time.
Prove to whom? You're talking about enforcing federal law. What law gives the responsibility to what federal agency for examining candidate qualifications and ensuring they are correct?
Try Miami, Florida. :-/
I have heard of cases in which a juror promised to obey the judge’s orders, then was convicted of perjury after exercising the right of jury nullification. Unfortunately, if you do not agree to apply the law as the judge directs, you will not be on the jury.
The only time I have actually made it into the courtroom for jury selection, I told the judge politely that I was not comfortable with giving up my right to nullify. I made it clear that I was not seeking such an opportunity, but was dismissed at once. The judge was not angry, and even thanked me for my candor; nevertheless, I was out.
The President is the top law enforcement officer in the nation. If he/she is illegal, there can be no law enforcement that is legal. Law is everything or nothing, not just to be enforced for the bottom dwellers. As to the court system, they are currently guilty of nullification of the eligibility requirements in the Constitution. Nullification must be fine and proper if those who pretend to rule over us utilize it.
Hmmm... sounds like if everyone knew this little bit,
they’d have trouble seating any jurors.
If I am a juror, the state HAS to prove something. In fact, they have to prove something "beyond my reasonable doubt". I have a reasonable doubt that Federal law exist anymore in this nation due to the nullification by our government of the eligibility requirements in the Constitution. They are asking me to verify that Federal law exist when they want me to act on its behalf as a juror. If they can prove it exist, beyond my reasonable doubt then I can do my duty in upholding the law. If there is no law, don't ask me to act as though there is on your behalf. That's the way the system works.
The Constitution is law. Twentieth Amendment, Section Three. The federal agency is "Congress". They are guilty of eligibility nullification.
They probably would, or else the judges would have to stop requiring jurors to give up their rights, which would not be such a bad outcome.
I like to tell people that if they want to get out of being on a jury, all they have to do is use the N-word in the courtroom. (Not that N-word, but “nullification”.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.