Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/13/2013 6:03:50 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

I was googling for info on that three-day waiting period — looks like this injunction has already been rejected.

“Cuomo used a “message of necessity” on Jan. 14, which allows him to skip the otherwise mandatory three-day waiting period before final passage of a bill. Bob Schulz, head of the group We The People of New York Inc., argued on behalf of the plaintiffs that Cuomo’s memo contained misrepresentations about what the bill would actually do.

“Supreme Court Justice Thomas McNamara said he denied the motion because he was “constrained” by previous decisions of the state’s highest court.

““The Court of Appeals has been clear, is clear, that judicial intervention or judicial review of a message of necessity is not allowed,” McNamara said.”

http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20130313/NEWS01/303130040/Andrew-Cuomo-New-York-gun-control-Bob-Schultz


2 posted on 03/13/2013 6:10:10 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

As if anybody cares about Constitutions anymore, except a few old die-hard bitter clingers.


3 posted on 03/13/2013 6:10:54 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Photo & Video Sharing by SmugMug
6 posted on 03/13/2013 6:20:57 PM PDT by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Why stop there? The Sullivan Act post McDonald, would certainly be unconstitutional, not to mention the trype in NY Safe Act..


7 posted on 03/13/2013 6:30:08 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cyborg; Clemenza; Cacique; NYCVirago; The Mayor; Darksheare; hellinahandcart; Chode; ...
Ithaca fires back with its support for gun laws

Upstate Counties Lead Opposition to NY SAFE Act

Two people related to Fort Hood shooting speak in Rochester (Hasan)

FReepmail me if you want on or off my New York ping list.

8 posted on 03/13/2013 6:58:22 PM PDT by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Isn’t it amazing how previous decisions by a court are considered to be rendered by God and not reviewable. Any Lawless political decision stands till the end of time. The court system in this country is not going to save this country. It dooms it.


10 posted on 03/13/2013 7:04:50 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

11 posted on 03/13/2013 7:14:36 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

[[by more than 1,000 plaintiffs ]]

That’s it? ONLY 1000 people signed onto this? That’s all the p eopel that the NRA could come up with to sign onto this lawsuit?


14 posted on 03/13/2013 8:31:19 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

This “too quickly” business ain’t gonna fly. This law has to be defeated on the grounds that it infringes on the rights of Americans to keep and bear arms, and that it violates the 14th amendment by allowing police to carry more than 7 rounds while denying citizens the same right.


15 posted on 03/13/2013 8:43:33 PM PDT by ez (Laws only apply to little people. Criminals, politicians, and newsies are exempt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson