1 posted on
03/11/2013 1:38:49 PM PDT by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: blam
“arbitrary and capricious” is the core of what's known in NYC legal terms as an Article 78 proceeding. Article 78 of the City Charter is very brief and it basically says New York City agencies (including Nanny's office) MUST do justice. What an aggrieved party does is get a judge to declare what the city has done is unjust. Fired cops often successfully sue the Police Commissioner using Article 78. - just saying
27 posted on
03/11/2013 2:53:40 PM PDT by
jmaroneps37
(Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
To: blam
Can one imagine being married to this insufferable man. If he is married, I truly feel sorry for his wife.
28 posted on
03/11/2013 2:57:26 PM PDT by
diamond6
(Need scientific proof of God? Check out: http://www.magisreasonfaith.org/)
To: blam
So, NYC just wasted a lot of $$$ on those 17-oz tester cups.
Nice going Bloomberg. No wonder your city is in financial trouble.
31 posted on
03/11/2013 3:19:59 PM PDT by
TomGuy
To: blam
American stupidity.... here’s one common sense judge. But Mikey Bloomberg is not going to be deterred from telling his subjects on how to take care of their health.
32 posted on
03/11/2013 3:21:49 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: blam
I am not sure the judge is right. Maybe he has a real legal reason, but I am not seeing what it is. Granted that the law is stupid, invasive, and destructive. But I don't think that can be a legal basis for overturning it. The legal remedy is to vote people that make stupid, invasive, and destructive laws out of office, not to have a judge overturn laws that they consider bad.
To: blam
Too bad New Yorkers cannot vote to ban what politicians can wear. Better yet, force them to wear a particular uniform. A clown suit comes to mind.
35 posted on
03/11/2013 3:31:51 PM PDT by
VRW Conspirator
(Sometimes it takes calamity to lead to serenity - FReeper RacerX1128)
To: blam
36 posted on
03/11/2013 3:32:03 PM PDT by
AdaGray
(squi)
To: blam
Why doesn’t Mayor Bloomberg just go and mind his own f’n business?
37 posted on
03/11/2013 3:44:09 PM PDT by
donhunt
(Certified and proud "Son of a Bitch".)
To: blam
ah just in time
38 posted on
03/11/2013 4:03:03 PM PDT by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
>> “It is arbitrary and capricious because it applies to some but not all ... “
Think Obamacare, elected officials, corp and union exemptions, etc.
43 posted on
03/11/2013 6:04:39 PM PDT by
Gene Eric
(The Palin Doctrine.)
To: blam
King Bloomers is an embarassment. Hard to beleive New Yorkers have fallen so low.
To: blam
Now let's see if some NY judge will rule the SAFE Act "arbitrary and capricious".
Because it is...
47 posted on
03/12/2013 8:05:49 AM PDT by
Gritty
(Necessity is the plea for every infringement of freedom; it is the argument of tyrants-PM Wm Pitt)
To: blam; Lazamataz; SheLion; Eric Blair 2084; -YYZ-; 31R1O; 383rr; AFreeBird; AGreatPer; Alamo-Girl; ..
‘Bout time somebody stopped the Tinpot of Gotham.
Nanny State PING!
To: blam; sickoflibs; fieldmarshaldj; NFHale; AuH2ORepublican; Perdogg; BillyBoy; justiceseeker93; ...
54 posted on
03/13/2013 12:12:11 AM PDT by
Impy
(All in favor of Harry Reid meeting Mr. Mayhem?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson