Posted on 02/24/2013 5:09:46 PM PST by Colonel Kangaroo
The Obama administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to strike part of a controversial 1996 law that bars recognition of same-sex marriage, even in the nine states where it is now legal, for such federal benefits as income and estate taxes and federal employee benefits.
“The law denies to tens of thousands of same sex couples who are legally married under state law an array of important benefits that are available to legally married opposite sex couples,” the Justice Department argued in a brief urging the high court to overturn the Defense of Marriage Act.
The justices hear oral arguments next month in two landmark marriage equality cases. One is a legal challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act. The other is a challenge to California’s Prop. 8, which rolled back same-sex marriage in America’s largest state. Lower federal courts have ruled against both DOMA and Prop. 8.
Washington, Maine and Maryland voted last November to legalize same-sex marriage, and has seen hundreds of marriages beginning in December.
“Each time the Obama administration acts to support LGBT (gay and lesbian) Americans, it feels even more significant when considered in the context of Presidential history: It was not all that long ago that President Reagan refused to help when many were dying of AIDS,” said Anne Levinson, a former judge and Seattle deputy mayor, and strategist in the 2012 campaign for marriage equality.
“President Bush embraced a platform and led an administration that vilified the LGBT community,” Levinson added.
In its legal brief, the Obama administration argues:
“Gay and lesbian people are a minority group with limited political power. Although some of the harshest and most overt forms of discrimination against gay and lesbian people have receded, that progress has hardly been uniform (either temporally or geographically) and has in significant respects been the result of judicial enforcement of the Constitution, not political action.”
The Defense of Marriage Act “targets the many gay and lesbian people legally married under state law for a harsh form of discrimination that bears no relation to their ability to contribute to society,” the brief adds.
The Obama administration announced last year that it would no longer defend DOMA in court. The defense of the 1996 anti-gay law has been taken up, and paid for out of public funds, by the Republican leadership in the U.S. House of Representatives.
The U.S. Council of Catholic Bishops has also filed briefs in defense of DOMA, arguing that supporters of traditional marriage would be subject to attack if the law is overturned.
Sure could have fooled me.
Threatening the Supreme Cournt now, are we? Damn fascists.
Threatening the Supreme Court now, are we? Damn fascists.
Question, if this does happen, and we all know the Constitution is moot according to this administration, if 9 states make all abortion illegal, can we overturn Roe v Wade?
If states which currently forbid homo marriage are forced to recognize those performed in states where it is recognized, why isn’t a concealed carry permit from Arizona or Texas recognized in Chicago or San Francisco?
Consistency of principle is not a well known virtue of the crusading new left.
In other words, the boy ain’t got the stones to do it himself so he wants someone else to do it for him.
Another tough question which would fall victim to the left’s mutilation of principle.
Attn:POTUS, STFU, MYOB and GTFO.
Of course Obama wants it overturned. He can then be married while he performs a Lewinsky.
Good thinkin’!
Well, this one is right in Roberts’ wheel house...
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Obama has no respect for the Constitution.
Five justices twisted logic and distorted the Constitution to approve ObamaKare.
This time he is counting on them to “find” a right to homo marriage in the Constitution.
Threatening the Supreme Court? Where’d you see that? They filed an amicus brief, not a threat.
The Defense of Marriage Act is Settled Law and should not be questioned by the president or the SCOTUS.
He has something on Roberts. The buzz is that it has something to do with the way Roberts adopted his kids.
This is a perpetual nightmare.
I wonder if Reggie will marry Obama after he dumps Michelle when his Presidency is over?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.