Skip to comments.CHRIS STEVENS WAS NOT EVEN REMEMBERED (IN OBAMA SOTU ADDRESS)
Posted on 02/13/2013 1:44:00 PM PST by smoothsailing
February 12, 2013
Joel B. Pollak
He mentioned the victims of the massacre in Newtown, CT in December, and invited the families of victims of other violent gun crimes to watch from the gallery. But the Benghazi victims' families were not present at all.
Instead of offering even the slightest word of tribute for the fallen, for Chris Stevens's amazing career or for the bravery of the diplomatic and security personnel who fought the enemy alone for several hours, President Obama boasted of his administration's success....
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I guess he didn’t deserve a vote.
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.
Of course he wasn’t..Stevens was just a pawn in Obama’s game of having an excuse to release the Blind Sheihk..when that failed miserably he allowed Stevens and the others to die..Obama doesn’t give a damn about ANYONE unless they are a Muslim
Obama is still waiting for the State Dept/CIA to finalize their findings. As for now, his death is only speculation.
Move on folks, nothing to see here....
He Sacrificed him to Cover Up is Alliance with The Libyan Rebels who are allied with Al-Qaeda!
Has this Question been answered yet by anyone "WHO TOLD THE STRIKE FORCE IN SICILY TO STAND DOWN!?!?"
smoothsailing~:” CHRIS STEVENS WAS NOT EVEN REMEMBERED “
Right ! That’s old news that he ignores, as did the enemedia
After all ,it was “just a few bumps in the road”
I mean : “..at this point , what does it matter “
The SOTU was just another “rah ! , rah !” moment for his excellency
He was a “bump in the road” for 0bama. In 0boober’s mind, the sooner the sheeple forget about the Benghazi victims the better, so why spoil a good State of the Union give away with unpleasantness.
I didn’t watch or listen to The Won’s fiasco and glad I didn’t but am not surprised he omitted the deaths of those patriots in Benghazi.
The first comment after the article sums Obama up perfectly.
To mention Benghazi would have opened the possibility that he had something to do with it. He never has anything to do with anything...especially anything that might have a negative impact on his PROGRESSIVE agenda. It is always someone else who is at fault...never “The One”.
Cue Hitlery ....
< screech on >What difference, at this point, does it make?! < /screech >
He did not mention them because he knew nothing about it.....(s)
1) Only the POTUS can authorize a CBA (cross border authority) command for a rescue mission in a foreign nation.
Plus Fact Two:
2) No rescue mission was attempted.
Equals Fact Three:
3) 0bama turned his back on 41 State Dept. and CIA employees refusing to issue a CBA command and went to bed so he could go to Las Vegas the next day.
I suspect that Obama really does not give a tinker’s damn about anyone but himself; I’ve been surprised he would allow Al Quaida to be hurt, but guess he simply had to in order to advance his fix for the Muslim Brotherhood. (Collateral damage, you know how that goes.) Remember, with this crowd of Marxists, the ends justify the means.
Why would he?
He was a PAWN to be used by Obama for
his MANPADs for al Qaeda project.
Why would he?
Obama and Clinton abdicated and left him to be
raped and murdered while watching it on their TVs.
Why would he?
Obama is as American as Putin or Ghengis Khan.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.